SpySmasher
Lead Guitar
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2016
- Messages
- 5,016
I've heard people complain about the looks of Spyderco blades but the hole is, in practice, without a doubt the best thumb opening system available anywhere.
Handled a bunch of spyderco knives, didn't care for the hole or the looks. Just personal preference really.
Thought the same thing. Bought a couple Spydercos. Realized I was correct. The hole prevents the knife from being functional for me. My knife spends majority of its time clipped inside my pocket. The hole makes the knife ridiculously wide so it makes it difficult to move anything else in or out of that pocket. Plus I find a thumb stud more comfortable and secure opening with or without gloves than the thumb hole. I still own one--a Salt edition--for carrying at beach and kayaking/boating but it stays inside the waistband which is annoying. However, it's the only completely rustproof knife that I know of so it's a tradeoff I deal with for those environments. I won't ever EDC one though. Despite what the vocal membership on this forum would suggest, plenty of people don't like the thumb hole and that's ok. Different likes and uses for different folks. It just so happens that the Spyderco brand is ideally suited for collectors so that is a major reason why they are so popular on this forum.
I think far more people use Spydercos than collect them because they're cute. Most people I know like them for all reasons that make Spyderco a Spyderco.
I was like the OP at first. I thought "who could want such a weird looking knife"? Then after I joined BladeForums and saw the overwhelming love, I knew I had to just look deeper to see why. I watched dozens of reviews and the Endura became beautiful to me after seeing the examples of Sal's form fits function style. The more I understood the why question, the more confident I was that it was time to try one. Even on my limited funds, I've ended up with 6 Spydercos within a few months. 2 Delicas, an Endura, a Stretch, a Tenacious, and a PM2 coming this week. I literally always carry a Spyderco in addition to another blade, normally a traditional slip joint. I suggest handling one. If you can't find one locally to fondle, pick up a budget version Byrd knife. You won't be disappointed!
It's something that makes more sense in use and in hand then trying to ponder.Hey guys,
I started collecting knives about 8 months ago and really like some of the designs by alot of the top companies. But I can't seem to get over the thumb hole that Spyderco has on all of their knives. I get that it's for quick opening, but why? It's makes the blade profile so big... Am I the only one like this?
Don't mean to offend anyone, or disrespect Spyderco, just curious.
Thanks,
Samuel
Jane might have a Delica that has served her well for a year with a ton of life left in the blade, but then a ZDP version comes out with different scale color to boot. Jane sees all these pics of the new knife on the forum, and now Jane can't stop thinking about it. Jane buys it, loves it, posts about it. Then a HAP40 version comes out with another different scale version. Well now Jane needs to try that one out, too, so another one bought. The cycle continues. Spyderco is happy because they are a profitable company, the economy is happy because spending is up, Jane is happy because she has choices galore. Furthermore Jane is also enticed to post a bunch on this forum because she has to show off all these cool knives she keeps buying. There are a million different examples of this in our economy from Spyderco knives to new cars to whatever. There is nothing wrong with this. It makes great business sense to Spyderco and it makes loyal fans happy. Win win. But just because Jane's friend John doesn't post much on the forum, but...