- Joined
- Feb 17, 2013
- Messages
- 6,139
Not to carry It's still a dagger. Texas law doesn't differentiate between a dagger, a punch dagger, a push dagger, a dagger bayonet, the "Ninja Mall Rainbow Karambit Dagger with Dragon's Teeth handles" dagger, etc.
Back when the law was written, (just an educated guess here, no facts), I'm sure the law started out just listing daggers and bowie knives, because those were the 2 most commmonly used knives in duels and also happened to be the 2 most commonly carried knife types (after the ubiquitous butcher knife) by poor folks. Rich folks could afford guns (and knives until reliable multishot pistols were developed), poor folks carried knives only. By the time the bill got out of committee, other knife types were added to cover the "fenceline lawyers" who might claim "But this is a dirk, not a dagger." Class difference are most likely why clubs and tomahawks are speciffically listed in the "bad weapons" section.
Back when the law was written, (just an educated guess here, no facts), I'm sure the law started out just listing daggers and bowie knives, because those were the 2 most commmonly used knives in duels and also happened to be the 2 most commonly carried knife types (after the ubiquitous butcher knife) by poor folks. Rich folks could afford guns (and knives until reliable multishot pistols were developed), poor folks carried knives only. By the time the bill got out of committee, other knife types were added to cover the "fenceline lawyers" who might claim "But this is a dirk, not a dagger." Class difference are most likely why clubs and tomahawks are speciffically listed in the "bad weapons" section.