No worries at all. I think that it also touches on a question of how much important performance geometry is for a martial blade in a contemporary context.
While there are obviously examples of sabres, lonswords, falchions etc that are very fierce, I think that if we look at a lot of currently issued edged weapons as well as some historical edged sidearms (later khukuris, combat knives, bayonets, pesh kabz etc) the answer would be that it often isn't that crucial, particularly on smaller, more thrust centric blades. Bigger, more powerful and faster blades are capable of delivering cuts, slashes and chops that sink deeply enough that the upper grind can become a big source of cutting resistance. On smaller, stabbier blades the depth of cut gained from a slash, chop etc is not as extreme and so the geometry at the apex and just behind the edge is more relevant.
