- Joined
- Oct 28, 2010
- Messages
- 765
Mayo, the problem for GEC is that many people prefer softly sprung knives, due to arthritis or weakness in their fingernails. It must be very difficult to get a real snappy action with softer springs without a lot of time intensive hand labor. A few years back, there was a lot of call for softer springs, which it seems GEC was pretty responsive to. Some think they went a little too far, others like them very much. To me, and seemingly several others here on BFC, the #44 Buffalo Jack gunstock pattern hit the happy medium right on the head. I highly recommend them for nearly perfect walk and talk. I believe I've had eight different #44s, and they are amazingly consistent.
One of my friends in town who has survived serious chemo always talks about chemo-brain. She likely has a point. I am trying to learn to slow down and not make quick decisions when I don’t have to. I usually regret it.
I too have a 44 and consider that knife a GEC masterpiece.
I pulled out my ebony 66 tonight to think about it. I love this pattern. It seems to be the perfect Stockman pattern for me. I don’t know why I got wrapped around the axel by the soft action on the secondary blades. Too much reading about the “right” walk and talk perhaps without due consideration of what that means for me. I think this is a situation in which I need to go with what seems right and good for me and be adaptable.
To stay somewhat on track, I am very satisfied with my 29, and think it really might be a good idea to get another. You know, just in case…