440c comparisons (where does it stand?)

strategy9

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2015
Messages
4,188
Anyone with in depth insight want to add or chime in, it is strongly encouraged, but i wanted to put together a somewhat short, (it's long, but for the amount of information packed in, it's actually pretty short), somewhat "laymen term" and understandable explanation of how some of your more basic steels compare to one another, as well as where 440c actually sits amongst them.

Steel is iron with carbon added for improved hardness

Stainless steel is steel with at least 13% chromium (by weight) added in to ward against rust. (D2 is 12% max, hence why it is called an "almost stainless" tool steel)

As per how 440c stacks up against other "basic" steels;
440c Carbon/Chromium content = 0.95-1.2%/16-18%
8cr14mov has a 0.8/14% max
Aus8 has a 0.75/14.5% max
12c27 has a 0.6/13.5% fixed
Making 440c more hardenable w/ better edge potential, better stain resistance, and higher carbide content for "toothiness".

440c also has more then twice the molybdenum of aus8 and 8cr14mov, (12c27 has 0) improving on toughness and adding slightly more carbides.

Aus8 and 8cr14mov both balance out the "carbide" levels a bit with adding a (very) small amount of the harder carbide Vanadium into the mix;
0.25% max for aus, and 0.15% for 8cr,
and aus8 helps boost its corrosion resistance and a bit of toughness with up to 0.5% nickel, However with the lower carbon content I imagine this nickel content also softens it up just a tad which leads to it's easy sharpening to a wicked sharp edge, but also leads to its common lackluster edge "holding" ability.

They are much more similar to a modified 440a which has the same lower carbon levels as aus8, but still has the higher chromium content of 440; all other factors the same. And even 14c27n is only a slightly lower carbon level 440a with less additives, less chromium, but adds some nitrogen to help improve hardness and corrosion resistance, also the svandik steel methodology boasts it to create a very pure and evenly distributed (consistent) steel ensuring better quality end product.

7cr17 is actually identical to 440a + a little bit of nickel added, whereas good 9cr18mov is more on par with a lower level carbon 440c w/ slightly higher chromium and molybednum levels, + a small bit of vanadium and nickel. Aus10 would be more on par with a vanadium and nickel enhanced 440c with lower chromium levels.

That all said, 440c (with a good heat treat) is still a GREAT basic all arpund stainless steel for baseline knives, and upwards of $100 for a nicer one shouldn't be considered "too much". It is the first " super" stainless, and still the standard by which others are measured.

440xh (cts-xhp) is then vanadium (0.45) and nickel (0.35) enhanced 440c with a boosted carbon level of 1.6% (up 0.4).
Basically if 440c is a tough old blue collar worker, then 440xh is 440c that hit the gym pretty hard...
(Another way to view it, it appears to be a true stainless d2 with half the vanadium and a nickle boost for softness)...

Take a good 440c with just a .2% increase in carbon, double the molybdenum, drop 4% chromium (carbides) and replace it with harder vanadium, and throw in a splash of nitrogen and a pinch of tungsten, and you have s30v.
440c in the gym with a good healthy diet and supplements

440v (cpm s60v) is then 440c + a whole 1% carbon bump, a mid equivalent chromium content (17%), the same vanadium as s30v, but instead of all the fancy additives like tungsten and nitrogen and extra moly, cut the bull and just add an extra 1.5% vanadium...
Like 440c on steroids! (I can imagine it takes a real keen edge for slicing like none other, but is hard as nails and tough to sharpen, and probably prone to chip?)

All in all in all though, diet and excersise is the most ideal way to go, and based on alloying elements and properties alone, along with my keen liking for 440c as a tried and true classic, (allbeit without having tried cts-xhp or s60v in person) my money is that s30v is in fact the best knife metal of the bunch all things considered, and s60v is probay a great hard slicer but that's about it... CTS-XHP appears to be an improved 440c so I can't wait to try it, because I do appreciate the original quite a bit.
 
Last edited:
I noticed you didn't include N690 (which from what I've been reading is 440c with some Cobalt added). Is there any reason for that other than just not having it to test? I assume the Cobalt would make it better than 440c.
 
Jay Fisher on 440C:

" There are new alloys all the time, and you'll see one thing in common with all of them. More details at this link. They compare their subjective performance details to one steel in particular. This one steel that is the benchmark for all comparisons of new stainless and wear-resistant alloy steels is (surprise) 440C. Why do you think that is? It's because 440C is a tried, true, and proven standard that is here to stay. It's interesting to note that no one steel has come and wiped 440C off the field, replaced every application of 440C in industry, manufacturing, or the military industrial field. 440C, that old, boring high chromium, hardenable, wear-resistant martensitic steel is here to stay."

He also goes on to say elsewhere that for ball bearings and such, no other stainless steel has the shape stability of 440C... That should say it all...

I've seen a rigorous test (altough 20 years ago) that showed properly heat-treated 440C blows everything away, including D-2, when cutting manilla rope with identical edge-bevels on knives specifically built identical for the test...

According to Jay, if you prefer carbon steels, the better steel, and the only one that is a proper industrial tool steel, ,is 0-1, with A-2 a close second. These are still inferior in edge-holding to stainless steels because of the lack of chrome.


Gaston
 
And where did these "facts" come from?

It appears that your conclusions about 440v come from you imagination!

440v (cpm s60v) is then 440c + a whole 1% carbon bump, a mid equivalent chromium content (17%), the same vanadium as s30v, but instead of all the fancy additives like tungsten and nitrogen and extra moly, cut the bull and just add an extra 1.5% vanadium...
Like 440c on steroids! (I can imagine it takes a real keen edge for slicing like none other, but is hard as nails and tough to sharpen, and probably prone to chip?)
 
And where did these "facts" come from?

It appears that your conclusions about 440v come from you imagination!
The "facts" come from the data spreadsheet regarding the alloy...
The conclusion however is just a guess, Hence exactly why I said, "I can only imagine"...
I even later admitted I have never used the stuff... So i thought it was made pretty clear it was only speculation on my part based on what I do know about steels and metals in general though; a few years of foundry experience under the belt incl. pouring, cutoff, grinding, finishing, and dipping (investment), I can only make a somewhat educated guess on how the steel would perform based on what is in it, and the alloying properties of said ingredients, since I never actually used it myself...

But thanks for pointing out obvious statements that were already made clear... Now they are even clearerer in case any one else besides you wasn't clear
 
I noticed you didn't include N690 (which from what I've been reading is 440c with some Cobalt added). Is there any reason for that other than just not having it to test? I assume the Cobalt would make it better than 440c.

N690co is actually much closer to vg10 than 440c
 
And where did these "facts" come from?

It appears that your conclusions about 440v come from you imagination!

hahaha :D you can also find some facts from google :D

o.png
 
The conclusion however is just a guess, ..., I can only make a somewhat educated guess on how the steel would perform based on what is in it, and the alloying properties of said ingredients, since I never actually used it myself...

Excellent. Just wanted to make sure what the conclusions in your

... somewhat short, (it's long, but for the amount of information packed in, it's actually pretty short), somewhat "laymen term" and understandable explanation of how some of your more basic steels compare to one another, as well as where 440c actually sits amongst them.

were based on.
 
I noticed you didn't include N690 (which from what I've been reading is 440c with some Cobalt added). Is there any reason for that other than just not having it to test? I assume the Cobalt would make it better than 440c.

No reason, just over looked it I guess... Started as just comparing the basics, 8cr, aus8, etc, in light of the Boker+ thread, and a few peoples mixed feelings, and/or some other people's lack of insight into the steels in general. It turned into more, but yeah, no particular reason...
It does appear to be in spec with 440c's lower carbon limits just over 1%, mid chromium limits (17%), and higher molybednum around 1%... Add in 1.5% cobalt and 0.1% van, and it's pretty much n690... And vg-10 and n690 are virtually identical aside from less chromium for VG; their respective +/- thresholds are different by a smidgen, as is the process from each manufacturer, but aside from chromium the rest of the numbers overlap in the middle.
 
Jay Fisher on 440C:

" There are new alloys all the time, and you'll see one thing in common with all of them. More details at this link. They compare their subjective performance details to one steel in particular. This one steel that is the benchmark for all comparisons of new stainless and wear-resistant alloy steels is (surprise) 440C. Why do you think that is? It's because 440C is a tried, true, and proven standard that is here to stay. It's interesting to note that no one steel has come and wiped 440C off the field, replaced every application of 440C in industry, manufacturing, or the military industrial field. 440C, that old, boring high chromium, hardenable, wear-resistant martensitic steel is here to stay."

He also goes on to say elsewhere that for ball bearings and such, no other stainless steel has the shape stability of 440C... That should say it all...

I've seen a rigorous test (altough 20 years ago) that showed properly heat-treated 440C blows everything away, including D-2, when cutting manilla rope with identical edge-bevels on knives specifically built identical for the test...

According to Jay, if you prefer carbon steels, the better steel, and the only one that is a proper industrial tool steel, ,is 0-1, with A-2 a close second. These are still inferior in edge-holding to stainless steels because of the lack of chrome.


Gaston

440C is a perfectly respectable steel, as is O-1 and 1095. I have custom knives made of 440C in the 1980's.

Your effort, however, to declare 440C as the greatest SS ever will remain a unique and lonely crusade. I salute you for your persistence.

Now if knives were only like ball bearings in cross section . . . .

And if only time stood still . . . .
 
OP, I respect your effort to gather the data together. A Google search will reveal earlier efforts. I suspect many of us tried this exercise. Certainly I did - more than once.

As in cooking, the ingredients are only part of the story. For example, chromium is not added for resistance to corrosion only.

"As with manganese, chromium has a tendency to increase hardness penetration.

This element has many interesting effects on steel. When 5 percent chromium or more is used in conjunction with manganese, the critical quenching speed is reduced to the point that the steel becomes air hardening.

Chromium can also increase the toughness of steel, as well as the wear resistance. ...

Steels with chromium also have higher critical temperatures in heat treatment."

Your study also necessarily excludes blade design and geometry, both or either of which may have more impact on performance than ingredients.

Thus, while you topic continues to fascinate us Knife Knuts, we do not control our destinies by selecting ingredients. In the end, we have to rely on the skill and integrity of those who "cook up" the knife from those ingredients.
 
At the end of the day, considering what Buck (and Case Tru-Sharp) has done and continues do with 420hc, a lower carbon, lower chromium, no molybednum version of 440a with 0.3% vanadium added to give it a little extra umph in strong carbides, all in all they are ALL quality basic stainless steels in their own right when mixed, handled, and heat treated properly and with care to detail.
If i had to rank them,

420hc - 12c27 *push
440a - 7cr17mov *push
14c28n - Aus8 - 8cr14mov *push
440c - aus10 - 9cr18mov *push

But again, ALL make a quality affordable blade steel when properly made by a company who knows how to handle a certain steel;
I think Cold Steel and their aus8, Kershaw and Sandvik 14c28n, Buck and Case both with 420hc, Boker Magnum and Boker(+) with 440a vs 440c, SOG, CRKT, Taylor with their 7-8-9cr-MoV's
familiarity with one over another can go a long way...

And just ftr, this is geared more as a reference point for any new and curious beginners looking for introductory knowledge on blade steels... I remember a while back when I was constantly googling this or that, trying to learn more about what makes knives "knives", and how complicated and scientific some of the references were, especially for someone with virtually zero knowledge when I began; (how many times I was referenced here to BF, and how much I learned... Hopefully this will help someone else's search one day).

2more to add;
Low (1%+) Carbon 440c, with just 14% chromium, but 5x the molybednum and a 0.4% vanadium & tungsten boost (which is actually missing from Hitachi's ats34), you have your self 154cm

Take a good 440c and give it a half a % boost in carbon, a quarter % boost in molybednum, and 3% vanadium, and you essentially made ELMAX. Which would explain why ELMAX is my personal favorite " super" steel, considering my strong liking towards 440c.
 
Last edited:
These threads always seem to have a common theme.

The last ten years missing.
 
440C is a perfectly respectable steel, as is O-1 and 1095. I have custom knives made of 440C in the 1980's.

Your effort, however, to declare 440C as the greatest SS ever will remain a unique and lonely crusade. I salute you for your persistence.

Now if knives were only like ball bearings in cross section . . . .

And if only time stood still . . . .

According to Jay, there are not that many carbon steels that qualify as true tool steels, that is, steels with added components designed for industrial purposes... He list true "tool steels", and the list is short... 440C is a true industrial tool steel.

Jay Fisher: "It's important to remember that O1 is a true tool steel. Tool steels are a special classification of steels, and they are designed specifically to make tools to cut, press, form and work other materials, including metal, woods, and plastics. The previous two listed alloy types were not specifically designed to be tools, and you can see that from the applications I listed that there are much more economical applications for these steels. I did not make these up, they are detailed specifically in the Machinery's Handbook®, the standard reference for machinists and engineers."

It is likely that some stainless steels make better blades than 440C, the question I have is: Where are the tests done on identical blades, made by the same maker to the same edge bevel and grit? The answer is, there are none...

You may want to consider the following as well:

Jay Fisher: "By the way, there is NO certified, regulated, sanctioned, or official testing authority of ANY knife performance, process, or construction, anywhere on this earth!"

"There is a reason that one knife blade analysis and testing site claims: "Grade 440C is capable of attaining, after heat treatment, the highest strength, hardness and wear resistance of all the stainless alloys."

If there really was something fundamentally better than the four steels he uses most commonly (out of about just ten he uses in total): 0-1, D-2, 440C and ATS 34, I'm sure he would be all over them...

Gaston
 
According to Jay, there are not that many carbon steels that qualify as true tool steels, that is, steels with added components designed for industrial purposes... He list true "tool steels", and the list is short... 440C is a true industrial tool steel.

Among tools steels, and all have carbon, being steel, and all have alloying ingredients, we have, to start:

A2
D2
S7
S5
O1
H13
P20
M2
M42
A6
A7
A10 GraphAir
O6 GraphMo
D3
D7
L6
LescoWear
CPM 1V
CPM 3V
CPM 4V
CPM 9V
CPM 10V
CPM 15V
CPM M4/PM M4
CPM T15/PM T15
CPM Rex 76/PM M48

Of course, if Jay dismisses all these industrial tools steels as not being "true" according to some definition unique to him, then he is -- according to his unique definition - perfectly correct. All assuming you have accurately quoted Jay.

I have yet to find a maker who acknowledges any steel "better," all things considered, than the steel that he uses: "There are better steels, but I chose not to use them." So we pick our maker and rely on his judgment.

"Grade 440C is capable of attaining, after heat treatment, the highest strength, hardness and wear resistance of all the stainless alloys."

As I recall, it has been pointed out that this statement, if ever correct, is not correct now. Again, time marches on.
 
Last edited:
If you heat treat a solid 440C well, you'll have a steel that holds an excellent edge quite well. It isn't terribly expensive and will serve you for a very long time. I like it in a large number of applications.

Captain O
 
At the end of the day, considering what Buck (and Case Tru-Sharp) has done and continues do with 420hc, a lower carbon, lower chromium, no molybednum version of 440a with 0.3% vanadium added to give it a little extra umph in strong carbides, all in all they are ALL quality basic stainless steels in their own right when mixed, handled, and heat treated properly and with care to detail.
If i had to rank them,

420hc - 12c27 *push
440a - 7cr17mov *push
14c28n - Aus8 - 8cr14mov *push
440c - aus10 - 9cr18mov *push

Rank them based on what property? Saying one steel is better than another, without saying better for what property or application, is meaningless.
 
Forum members here for the most part respect 440c,it is a decent steel ,but we are in kind of a steel renaissance right now ,which is why there is a huge variety of steels to choose from, all being tested by most of us here ,where this will all end up is part of the fun-no matter which makers website you read ("jay" included) they will all have some elements of truth and some of hype,the problem being is that there are so many variables to consider that it makes talking about absolutes pointless...just my .02¢
 
Back
Top