47 Ronin (Keanu Reeves Flick)

Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Messages
5,445
Just like in "300", Hollyweird decided to apply the fantasy-spin/pseudo-history schtick on the revered (re: known as a Japanese "national legend") story of the "47 Ronin". For those not acquainted HERE's the Wiki entry.

[youtube]j8cKdDkkIYY[/youtube]

Looks "good" but my expectations might be too high. What do you think?
 
He sounds like he's using the same lines from the Matrix. Got to love one trick pony actors. That being said it looks pretty good if you take it with a grain of salt. I was skeptical about Tom Cruise being the "last samurai" and it turned out to be pretty good so we'll see about this one.
 
He sounds like he's using the same lines from the Matrix. Got to love one trick pony actors. That being said it looks pretty good if you take it with a grain of salt. I was skeptical about Tom Cruise being the "last samurai" and it turned out to be pretty good so we'll see about this one.

Hiroyuki Sanada is in both of these films and interestingly enough, in Japanese cinema he's twice the actor/matinee idol Cruise and Reeves can ever hope to be. They even call him "the Duke" over there plus a legit martial artist in real life.
 
I really don't know how well the story of Chushingura will translate. It illustrates one particular nuance of "Bushido Spirit" sitting in the niche between the ideals of "Hagakure" and those of "The Life Giving Sword". I doubt it would respond well to the "Hollywood treatment" and I doubt Keanu Reeves has the subtlety in his acting to pull it off. Not enough action to be a proper action film and has that typically japanese 2 hours of plot setting for 10 minutes of intense action at the end.
It may be a good film, possibly spoiled by any references as to its origins, rather like the remake of "The Italian Job". Compare Besson's "La Femme Nikita" with the Bridget Fonda remake "The Assassin" then multiply the bits "lost in translation" a hundredfold. Chushingura isn't a story you can remove from it's context, like transplanting Julius Caesar into a modern fascist state, nor is it a story you can pastiche like "Wild, Wild West" or "Starsky & Hutch".
I dunno, I'll definitely look out for it, to see how it'll be "treated", but I'm not expecting to be anything but disappointed. Which will be a very pleasant surprise if I'm proved wrong.
 
Pretty obvious it has nothing to do with the historical tale - so why call 47 Ronin?
 
Looks "good" but my expectations might be too high. What do you think?

Keanue Reeves? My expectations couldn't be any lower.

The movie might start off with some epic scenery, a breathtaking love story, or an accurately re-created historic battle. But then Keaneau will ruin the whole film by saying or doing something. I guarantee it.
 
Back
Top