- Joined
- Dec 2, 2005
- Messages
- 65,503
I'll have a look through the GEC patterns shortly, and let you know what I think :thumbup:
The GEC site is SO clunky! Can anyone reccomend a better site to view all their different frames?
I'll have a look through the GEC patterns shortly, and let you know what I think :thumbup:
I've been looking for a straight frame lambfoot and haven't come across one yet, but now I know I'll eventually find one. Thanks Jack.
Equal end 3 and 3/4" with a spear and a cap lifter on a single spring is my ideal EDC. Nice size, and slim in the pocket, with tools I use most often. I would take the same with a punch. Both would make great knives. Make similar with a cap lifter and a punch and we are talking grail knife.
Here's an old Robeson to ponder...
The majority of the Lambsfoot knives I have aren't on Swayback frames :thumbup:
What benefit does a lambs foot have over a wharnie? Seems like the same uses but you lose the better tip with the lambs. I feel like this is the reason you don't see many lambs foot knives. An equal end with spear and wharnie would cover all grounds blade wise to me. Imagine the 92 talon wharnie and the 85 spear blade together.
The lambsfoot is more robust than a Wharncliffe. Every once in a while I read a post about some person breaking the tip off a Wharncliffe. Not likely with a lambsfoot. The point is supported by more steel.
That's why I asked the question on a knife board. Was hoping for an answer. I guess a condescending answer is still an answer, so I will take what I can get.Well before you comment on a knife's design it usually helps to use one first, then you can have an INFORMED opinion[emoji106]In Britain, Lambsfoot knives have been massively popular for a very long time, far more so than the Wharncliffe knife )and other knives with a similar blade shape), which also originated here. The reasons why the Lambsfoot has historically been much less popular in the US have been discussed here in numerous threads over the years, for example in Carl's excellent thread here: http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/s...foot-and-the-spear-American-and-English-taste .
Plenty of posters here on The Porch have used knives with both Lambsfoot and Wharncliffe blades, and I am one of them. I prefer the Lambsfoot, and know a number of other long-standing members here who feel the same. The Lambsfoot has a stronger point than the Wharncliffe, while at least matching (and in my opinion) surpassing the Wharncliffe for fine detail work. Of the three basic straight-edge blades, I consider the Lambsfoot the most versatile, and also the best (losing out only to a large Sheepsfoot for heavy cutting duties). You should give one a try, and like many who have, you may well be surprised :thumbup:
That's why I asked the question on a knife board. Was hoping for an answer. I guess a condescending answer is still an answer, so I will take what I can get.
Thanks for the other answers everyone. I honestly wasn't sure.
That's why I asked the question on a knife board. Was hoping for an answer. I guess a condescending answer is still an answer, so I will take what I can get.
(My emphasis)What benefit does a lambs foot have over a wharnie? Seems like the same uses but you lose the better tip with the lambs. I feel like this is the reason you don't see many lambs foot knives.
Jack i'm sorry you don't like two blades supported by a single spring
Easy Tiger! You didn't just ask a question, you made a statement:
(My emphasis)
It was the statement that the first sentence of my post addressed. The rest of the two paragraphs replied to your question. I'm sorry if you feel my reply was condescending, but I went to the trouble of trying to explain what was wrong with your statement, and answer your question, at some length, and as someone who uses a Lambsfoot blade. If you're not happy with the answer, fair enough, but if I'd been condescending, I can assure you you'd have got a much shorter reply :thumbup: