? about the Cold Steel NCO Marine Corps rendition sword...

Joined
Aug 4, 2013
Messages
3,989
I was thinking about adding this sword to my collection. I know that Cold Steel does not sell it as an authorized NCO Marine Corps sword, but rather as their rendition that is fully functional, not a ceremonial only type. That said, I have recently read reviews that claim the latest Cold Steel versions having changed with their blade etchings to the point of being totally off from the original standard ceremonial versions. Things like "United States Marines" no longer even on the CS rendition, and replaced with simply the word "Marines". My not having served in the military, but wanting to include this rendition (because of it's functional sword status), is now being diminished by the possibility that the etching is way off the mark. If indeed this etching is now no longer authentic in nature, and if it once was, why did Cold Steel feel the need to change it and not stay true to the original markings found on the Corp's ceremonial swords?

I can only say, imo, that if Cold Steel can't or won't follow true to the USMC sword etchings on the blade, than they should simply offer this exact same sword with no etchings at all. The rendition would actually be more authentic without any etchings, than to have etchings which are incorrectly done.

An example of why I see it that way...
Let's say you have a chance to buy a decently made wrist-watch that is highly based on a Rolex brand design. Let's say the quality was very good, but priced much more reasonably. Would it be more desirable to see it offered with no markings at all, or with it having "Bolex" placed where "Rolex" usually stamps their logo? My belief is that no logo would be seen better than "Bolex"... In the same way that no etching on the CS NCO US Marine Corps rendition sword is a better alternative than incorrect wording and etching.
 
Last edited:
just a wild guess, but maybe a legal issue......no rights to do it routine, costs more than they wanted to pay to get the rights to do it...something like that?
 
Despite having no real interest or knowledge on the subject, I agree with the OP by his description of the subject. Aside from necessary markings like the brand, location of manufacture, and blade steel, the sword may as well just be devoid of markings if they're trying to avoid any chance of confusing it with the official sword.
 
just a wild guess, but maybe a legal issue......no rights to do it routine, costs more than they wanted to pay to get the rights to do it...something like that?

I am thinking you are correct, sir... And if that is the case, then totally understandable. But, that whole mickey mouse pattern and wording replacement idea, with etching being incorrect... It may only push buyers away. They can't use the actual correct etching?... Then maybe some unique pattern etching can replace the original, and have no wording whatsoever. Or, maybe leave the blade totally un-etched... They should forget the current "Bolex" idea, which, imo, simply makes it tacky.
 
Back
Top