- Joined
- Aug 4, 2013
- Messages
- 3,989
I was thinking about adding this sword to my collection. I know that Cold Steel does not sell it as an authorized NCO Marine Corps sword, but rather as their rendition that is fully functional, not a ceremonial only type. That said, I have recently read reviews that claim the latest Cold Steel versions having changed with their blade etchings to the point of being totally off from the original standard ceremonial versions. Things like "United States Marines" no longer even on the CS rendition, and replaced with simply the word "Marines". My not having served in the military, but wanting to include this rendition (because of it's functional sword status), is now being diminished by the possibility that the etching is way off the mark. If indeed this etching is now no longer authentic in nature, and if it once was, why did Cold Steel feel the need to change it and not stay true to the original markings found on the Corp's ceremonial swords?
I can only say, imo, that if Cold Steel can't or won't follow true to the USMC sword etchings on the blade, than they should simply offer this exact same sword with no etchings at all. The rendition would actually be more authentic without any etchings, than to have etchings which are incorrectly done.
An example of why I see it that way...
Let's say you have a chance to buy a decently made wrist-watch that is highly based on a Rolex brand design. Let's say the quality was very good, but priced much more reasonably. Would it be more desirable to see it offered with no markings at all, or with it having "Bolex" placed where "Rolex" usually stamps their logo? My belief is that no logo would be seen better than "Bolex"... In the same way that no etching on the CS NCO US Marine Corps rendition sword is a better alternative than incorrect wording and etching.
I can only say, imo, that if Cold Steel can't or won't follow true to the USMC sword etchings on the blade, than they should simply offer this exact same sword with no etchings at all. The rendition would actually be more authentic without any etchings, than to have etchings which are incorrectly done.
An example of why I see it that way...
Let's say you have a chance to buy a decently made wrist-watch that is highly based on a Rolex brand design. Let's say the quality was very good, but priced much more reasonably. Would it be more desirable to see it offered with no markings at all, or with it having "Bolex" placed where "Rolex" usually stamps their logo? My belief is that no logo would be seen better than "Bolex"... In the same way that no etching on the CS NCO US Marine Corps rendition sword is a better alternative than incorrect wording and etching.
Last edited: