Please correct my misunderstandings. I am thinking about a grinder build and I am trying to think through all of my options. I have 220 V single phase power available. So here are the pros and cons as I understand them.
AC step pully constant RPM: pro: Lowest cost, lowest maintenance, torque goes up as belt speed goes down, pretty much wire the motor then go.
con: 3 or 4 belt speeds, lowest motor efficiency @ 70% (might not have the lowest overall efficiency), takes more time to switch
belt speeds.
DC (brushed PM) step pulley constant RPM: pro: low cost to motor efficiency @ 81% (1.5 HP PMDC TEFC can be had for @$250), reversible.
con: Requires a full wave rectifier to operate on AC, higher maintenance (replace brushes), 3 or 4 belt speeds,
takes time to switch belt speeds.
notes: Unless I can build the appropriate rectifier for less than $100 it is probably better to go with variable
speed using SCR.
AC with VFD: pro: low cost to motor efficiency (3 phase @ 77-82%, these motors are close in price to 1 phase), variable speed, direct drive, smooth, 1P to
3P conversion.
con: VFD fairly expensive (@$400 for 1.5 HP NEMA 4), loss of motor efficiency as belt speed is decreased. 3P high efficiency motors (@ 86%)
fairly expensive. VFD fairly complex-more pieces to break.
notes: I think many VFDs can be wired to accept 1P or 3P, 110V or 220V input and set up to give 3P 110V, 208V, or 220V output. How good
are the warranties on VFDs? Might loose smoothness at lower RPMs.
DC (brushed PM) with SCR: pro: low cost to motor efficiency @ 81% (1.5 HP PMDC TEFC can be had for @$250), reversible, variable speed, maintains torque
as belt speed is decreased, direct drive, smooth throughout RPM range, SCR is simpler than VFD-less things to break.
con: higher maintenance on motor, SCR is still expensive (@$330 for 1.5 HP reversible NEMA 4), motor efficiency decreases as belt
speed is decreased.
notes: brushless PMDC motors are available with low maintenance and high efficiency but the prices are high. How long do the
motors (magnets) last on PMDC motors?
AC step pully constant RPM: pro: Lowest cost, lowest maintenance, torque goes up as belt speed goes down, pretty much wire the motor then go.
con: 3 or 4 belt speeds, lowest motor efficiency @ 70% (might not have the lowest overall efficiency), takes more time to switch
belt speeds.
DC (brushed PM) step pulley constant RPM: pro: low cost to motor efficiency @ 81% (1.5 HP PMDC TEFC can be had for @$250), reversible.
con: Requires a full wave rectifier to operate on AC, higher maintenance (replace brushes), 3 or 4 belt speeds,
takes time to switch belt speeds.
notes: Unless I can build the appropriate rectifier for less than $100 it is probably better to go with variable
speed using SCR.
AC with VFD: pro: low cost to motor efficiency (3 phase @ 77-82%, these motors are close in price to 1 phase), variable speed, direct drive, smooth, 1P to
3P conversion.
con: VFD fairly expensive (@$400 for 1.5 HP NEMA 4), loss of motor efficiency as belt speed is decreased. 3P high efficiency motors (@ 86%)
fairly expensive. VFD fairly complex-more pieces to break.
notes: I think many VFDs can be wired to accept 1P or 3P, 110V or 220V input and set up to give 3P 110V, 208V, or 220V output. How good
are the warranties on VFDs? Might loose smoothness at lower RPMs.
DC (brushed PM) with SCR: pro: low cost to motor efficiency @ 81% (1.5 HP PMDC TEFC can be had for @$250), reversible, variable speed, maintains torque
as belt speed is decreased, direct drive, smooth throughout RPM range, SCR is simpler than VFD-less things to break.
con: higher maintenance on motor, SCR is still expensive (@$330 for 1.5 HP reversible NEMA 4), motor efficiency decreases as belt
speed is decreased.
notes: brushless PMDC motors are available with low maintenance and high efficiency but the prices are high. How long do the
motors (magnets) last on PMDC motors?