Macchina
Gold Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2006
- Messages
- 5,204
I am a Product Design Engineer for a very high quality American Furniture Company. We pride ourselves in being American Made and our craftsmanship is among the best in the nation on handmade furniture. Though many of our pieces sell in the $5000 range, they are made with natural materials and therefore there are knots in the wood, wrinkles in the leather, texture to the wool, etc. On top of that, all our seams are sewn manually and therefore show the quality of the craftsman while still showing the uniqueness in each piece. When fabric is pulled over foam and manually stapled it creates slightly different form in the morning as it does in the evening. On top of this, natural materials wear in a certain way that can actually add to the value of some of our products. Certain lines have been in production for decades and older pieces with wear (not damage) can sell on the second-hand collectors market for more than a new one.
These "flaws" in the materials and workmanship as well as wear are what the Japanese (derived from the Chinese) call Wabi Sabi. I admittedly don't fully understand the principal or even the translation but I believe Wabi refers to the details that show something was manufactured (ideally by hand) with certain flaws left in the product. I believe I once read it actually means something about living alone in the forest. I think a rustic clay pot is the ideal example of Wabi. Sabi refers to the wear and patina that objects pick up as they are used. The patina and scratches on a knife are actually a perfect example of this concept. I believe that both Wabi and Sabi do not negatively affect the intended function of the object.
I think many of us have embraced the principle of Sabi in our collections. Patina is prized and a decent amount of our threads are designed to show worn/used knives. Praise often comes from an "earned" patina while a force patina (maybe a form of artistic Wabi?) is also seen as a positive.
Where I think we all could improve (I know I could) is in the area of Wabi. Accepting the cosmetic flaws of a knife that do not affect function. I am OK with gaps, obtuse/absent factory edges, and slightly mis-matched scales, but off-center blades and non-flush springs really bother me. These are serious hang-ups for me and detract from the beauty of the knife so much more so than something like a mismatched cover would.
I received my first TC Barlow a few months back and upon initial inspection everything was perfect except for the final grinding on the Blackwood covers took far more off one side than the other. The handle bevel actually flows into the bolster by 1/4" on side and not on the other. I thought about this for a while and decided I appreciated the proof of hand-finishing and accepted the "flaw" as Wabi. If I could only do this for springs and off-center blades I would be a much more happy collector!
There is a point where extensive Wabi on an expensive knife becomes sloppy craftsmanship, that is not what I am referencing here. If the flaw affects function (loose blades when open, cracked covers, blades contacting back springs, exceptionally poor grinds, etc.) then it is not Wabi, especially at the prices we pay for our knives.
Do you accept both the Wabi AND the Sabi in your knives? I'd love to see examples of Wabi (and Sabi) if you have any "flaws" you have come to appreciate.
A couple of my examples:
Wabi on my Hess Tiburon. The handle is attached with a brass nut that is tightened on a steel thread until the leather handle discs are under tension. The nut is turned to whatever angle it happens to be properly tensioned at, and polishing has deformed the aluminum pomel where the openings in the nut are. I love the original method of attachment and the way that hand finishing has mixed 3 different metals into a juxtaposed union:
Sabi on my first GEC I purchased new, a 15 Scout. The patina is from many apples and the bone has worn in some places from pocket carry:
These "flaws" in the materials and workmanship as well as wear are what the Japanese (derived from the Chinese) call Wabi Sabi. I admittedly don't fully understand the principal or even the translation but I believe Wabi refers to the details that show something was manufactured (ideally by hand) with certain flaws left in the product. I believe I once read it actually means something about living alone in the forest. I think a rustic clay pot is the ideal example of Wabi. Sabi refers to the wear and patina that objects pick up as they are used. The patina and scratches on a knife are actually a perfect example of this concept. I believe that both Wabi and Sabi do not negatively affect the intended function of the object.
I think many of us have embraced the principle of Sabi in our collections. Patina is prized and a decent amount of our threads are designed to show worn/used knives. Praise often comes from an "earned" patina while a force patina (maybe a form of artistic Wabi?) is also seen as a positive.
Where I think we all could improve (I know I could) is in the area of Wabi. Accepting the cosmetic flaws of a knife that do not affect function. I am OK with gaps, obtuse/absent factory edges, and slightly mis-matched scales, but off-center blades and non-flush springs really bother me. These are serious hang-ups for me and detract from the beauty of the knife so much more so than something like a mismatched cover would.
I received my first TC Barlow a few months back and upon initial inspection everything was perfect except for the final grinding on the Blackwood covers took far more off one side than the other. The handle bevel actually flows into the bolster by 1/4" on side and not on the other. I thought about this for a while and decided I appreciated the proof of hand-finishing and accepted the "flaw" as Wabi. If I could only do this for springs and off-center blades I would be a much more happy collector!
There is a point where extensive Wabi on an expensive knife becomes sloppy craftsmanship, that is not what I am referencing here. If the flaw affects function (loose blades when open, cracked covers, blades contacting back springs, exceptionally poor grinds, etc.) then it is not Wabi, especially at the prices we pay for our knives.
Do you accept both the Wabi AND the Sabi in your knives? I'd love to see examples of Wabi (and Sabi) if you have any "flaws" you have come to appreciate.
A couple of my examples:
Wabi on my Hess Tiburon. The handle is attached with a brass nut that is tightened on a steel thread until the leather handle discs are under tension. The nut is turned to whatever angle it happens to be properly tensioned at, and polishing has deformed the aluminum pomel where the openings in the nut are. I love the original method of attachment and the way that hand finishing has mixed 3 different metals into a juxtaposed union:

Sabi on my first GEC I purchased new, a 15 Scout. The patina is from many apples and the bone has worn in some places from pocket carry:

Last edited: