Article: "3D printing doubles the strength of stainless steel"

Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Messages
987
I saw this & thought it might be of interest to my fellow forumites.

Link: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/10/3d-printing-doubles-strength-stainless-steel

The first 3 paragraphs are filler. The last 3: "
The problem has been that, on a microscopic level, printed stainless steels are usually highly porous, making them weak and prone to fracture. “The performance has been awful,” says Yinmin “Morris” Wang, a materials scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California. Several years ago, Wang and his colleagues came up with an approach for using lasers and a rapid cooling process to fuse metal alloy particles together in a dense, tightly packed structure.

Now, they’ve extended that work by designing a computer-controlled process to not only create dense stainless steel layers, but to more tightly control the structure of their material from the nanoscale to micron scale. That allows the printer to build in tiny cell wall–like structures on each scale that prevent fractures and other common problems. Tests showed that under certain conditions the final 3D printed stainless steels were up to three times stronger than steels made by conventional techniques and yet still ductile, the scientists report today in Nature Materials.

“What they have done is really exciting,” says Rahul Panat, a mechanical engineer at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. What’s more, Panat says, is that Wang and his colleagues used a commercially available 3D printer and laser to do the work. That makes it likely that other groups will be able to quickly follow their lead to make a wide array of high-strength stainless steel parts for everything from fuel tanks in airplanes to pressure tubes in nuclear power plants. And that, in turn, will likely only increase the growing fervor over 3D printing."

The link in the text leads to a nature.com article behind a paywall:
"Additively manufactured hierarchical stainless steels with high strength and ductility"

Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/nmat5021

Abstract: "Many traditional approaches for strengthening steels typically come at the expense of useful ductility, a dilemma known as strength–ductility trade-off. New metallurgical processing might offer the possibility of overcoming this. Here we report that austenitic 316L stainless steels additively manufactured via a laser powder-bed-fusion technique exhibit a combination of yield strength and tensile ductility that surpasses that of conventional 316L steels. High strength is attributed to solidification-enabled cellular structures, low-angle grain boundaries, and dislocations formed during manufacturing, while high uniform elongation correlates to a steady and progressive work-hardening mechanism regulated by a hierarchically heterogeneous microstructure, with length scales spanning nearly six orders of magnitude. In addition, solute segregation along cellular walls and low-angle grain boundaries can enhance dislocation pinning and promote twinning. This work demonstrates the potential of additive manufacturing to create alloys with unique microstructures and high performance for structural applications."
 
I don't understand any of it, really, but I'm all in favor of engineers doing cool new things with technology to make "stronger" steel. For any of you guys that do understand, could this theoretically make better-performing knife blades? Is high "yield strength and tensile ductility" a trait we desire in knife steel?
 
If they can make a martensitic stainless with added toughness, after HT, I am all for it!
 
So actually the article should say: New te
I don't understand any of it, really, but I'm all in favor of engineers doing cool new things with technology to make "stronger" steel. For any of you guys that do understand, could this theoretically make better-performing knife blades? Is high "yield strength and tensile ductility" a trait we desire in knife steel?

Duuctility would probably translate best as toughness. One thing is when they they say 3x stronger what do they mean by "strength?" Is it abrasion resistance? Is it hardness?

This reminds me of that "liquidmetal" techology I had heard about before. https://www.liquidmetal.com/
 
Gonna need real-world testing to convince me, and the rest of the community I'd assume. I eagerly await. Sounds good on paper for sure...
 
So actually the article should say: New te


Duuctility would probably translate best as toughness. One thing is when they they say 3x stronger what do they mean by "strength?" Is it abrasion resistance? Is it hardness?

This reminds me of that "liquidmetal" techology I had heard about before. https://www.liquidmetal.com/
Liquidmetal processing is the same as MIM for firearms parts. It has proven to be sub-par in that application. I must assume that it would make for a subpar blade.
 
Liquidmetal processing is the same as MIM for firearms parts. It has proven to be sub-par in that application. I must assume that it would make for a subpar blade.

Oh so you're saying the Miltner Adams knife made out of it that is supposed to be a million times better than steel is a lie!? :O

I am very wary of any of these technology's claims. When they make a knife out of this 3d pronting that can be tested maybe we will get a better idea. At the same time I wouldn't hold my breath for that Gundanium alloy metal. I remain skeptical.
 
My read on it is that it will give added tensile strength in an engineered direction, so you will get better overall strength for structure, but won't matter for knife blades. Maybe for a handguard, or other parts, but it won't work for a blade. It will be nanoscopic honeycomb, and since edges can be effected by sub micron carbides, I don't think we'll see this for blades.
 
The article, like most others attempting to describe science to a lay audience, gets some details wrong or at least somewhat misleading. However, the answer to whether this would be good for knives is actually found within the article. It first describes the production of conventional steel and then starts the next paragraph with, "3D printing researchers have long tried to reproduce this structure." And then describes how 3d printed steel has been poor due to the manufacturing process. Therefore, this research has been to make 3d printed steel closer to the conventionally melted and forged product. Not better, but closer to the superior performance of the material already used by knifemakers.
 
I know that to us on bladeforums strength has specific meanings but when I see it used in marketing, especially with claims like "10x stronger" I wonder what they mean specifically. Tensile strength? Torsional strength?

Also I am surprised better ductility wouldn't lend itself to better toughness. I would have thought more ductility would mean less chipping or breakage.
 
About 10 years ago Liquid Metal was going to replace titanium for golf driver heads. Best thing ever for every club in the bag. The problem was that each club was going to cost about a million dollars and the only people who could afford them were the pros, who didn't need them. The BEST golfer is so good he not only doesn't need them, he spits on them. After 6 months, LiquidMetal disappeared from the golf magazines. Suspect the same thing will happen here.
 
When I heard this my first thought was that we're heading toward a time when a blade could be printed with differentially hardened blade edges or something akin to san mai without the traditional forging.
Depending on where the technology goes we may get some new alloys out of it or even completely different techniques that become the norm like drop forging did back in the teens or twenties if I remember correctly.
 
I'm still waitin' on that flying car . So much promising stuff never developed . But many did . Digital music , photos , cell phones etc .
 
Liquidmetal processing is the same as MIM for firearms parts. It has proven to be sub-par in that application. I must assume that it would make for a subpar blade.
Not sub-par just nothing all the better than the usual blades. Kershaw played with MIM blades for a while.

1597.jpg


As far as MIN for firearm parts, they're as good as the molds used and finishing work done. Far from being categorically bad as a material.
 
I'm still waitin' on that flying car . So much promising stuff never developed . But many did . Digital music , photos , cell phones etc .

Google "flying car" and you'll see that it is here.
 
Back
Top