I have noticed that everyone here recommends 1" or 2" belt sanders.
There are many 4"X36" sanders out there, most with a bonus disk sander for very reasonable prices. What's wrong with these?
I noticed on a woodworking forum that a plane blade maker who uses mostly hi-speed steel (M-2 and M-4) uses one of these for final shaping as well as sharpening all of his tools including plane blades, knives, chisels, etc. He simply tapped a couple of holes in the sander on each side of the belt and fitted a simple adjustable tool holder.
He uses the disk sander for final shaping of handles, etc.
Except for recurve knives, I don't understand the need for narrow sanding belts.
However, there must be some reason people want to use those narrow belts. By the way, metal working belts of ceramic and silicon carbide are readily available in the 4X36 size at discount prices through several sources including Supergrit.
Thanks for any comments. I am trying to decide between a nice 1X42 like the Lee Valley or Kalamazoo or going with a decent 4X36.
There are many 4"X36" sanders out there, most with a bonus disk sander for very reasonable prices. What's wrong with these?
I noticed on a woodworking forum that a plane blade maker who uses mostly hi-speed steel (M-2 and M-4) uses one of these for final shaping as well as sharpening all of his tools including plane blades, knives, chisels, etc. He simply tapped a couple of holes in the sander on each side of the belt and fitted a simple adjustable tool holder.
He uses the disk sander for final shaping of handles, etc.
Except for recurve knives, I don't understand the need for narrow sanding belts.
However, there must be some reason people want to use those narrow belts. By the way, metal working belts of ceramic and silicon carbide are readily available in the 4X36 size at discount prices through several sources including Supergrit.
Thanks for any comments. I am trying to decide between a nice 1X42 like the Lee Valley or Kalamazoo or going with a decent 4X36.