If I'm not mistaken, Ritter's design also uses G10 instead of the fiberglass (Noryl GTX) that the BM Grips have. So........different blade shape (higher chord giving the appearance of more belly), different steel, different scales (
NO, I checked, standard Noryl scales on Ritter's knife too - it's the fixed Ritter-Grip I was thinking of for G10).
Is it worth an extra $55? That's up to you. I like the blade shape and the stonewashed finish of the Ritter, and I appreciate S30V steel, but 154CM is, BY NO MEANS, a steel to scoff at. Thinking that a difference will be realized between the two steels by the average user would be foolish. Only if you had one of each, and used them identically in a semi-test manner, would the average guy notice a difference...I think.
It is apparent that S30V holds an edge
slightly longer than 154CM, I can see that in the knives I own....but the difference is, I can promise you, negligible. Many might tell you different, but I don;t buy it. I own them, use them, and sharpen them.....the diff is noticeable, but just barely. Now you could have a professional tester tell you that one will cut rope (or whatever) 230% longer than the other, and that I would believe, but in daily use, one dulls just liek the other.
So is it worth double the price? Well, I'm sure going to get a Ritter Mk1 someday. The fixed Ritter Grip will be first, though. (((

))) I do wish Doug would have specified G10 or micarta for the scales though. A fellow Forumite, a few weeks ago, mentioned how "plasticky" the Grip's scales felt.... how there's that plastic "clicky" feeling when your hand or fingers rubs against the edge of the scales. So the next time I handled one, I looked for that. It's true. The knife is great, but the scales "feel" cheap. Of course, that particular beef will be the same on both knives, I suppose.