"As for the question of home defense, it's an ongoing argument and both sides have valid points. There's that case of an old man who successfully averted a home robbery with a gun - upon finding out that the gun was unregistered, the police took it away. He was robbed again at a later date, and without a means to protect himself, was strangled to death. I personally don't own a gun though, and if I did, I would keep it in a case, ammo and bolt separate, for recreational/hunting usage. Why? Because statistically, an unloaded gun kept accessible is 500% more likely to hurt a loved one than an intruder whereas a loaded one is an astonishing 900%. The percentage of break-ins that involve a gun-wielding robber is also VERY slim (I can't recall the percentage off the top of my head), so the idea of "gun-to-a-knife-fight" is nothing but fallacy..."
I don't know where you get your statistics, but the above is NOT true. It's more like the anti-gun propaganda spewed by Oprah Winfrey or Sarah Brady, et al. Unfortunately fro you, the facts do not bear your claim out. Most home invaders are armed with guns, usually stolen. Criminals don't purchase their guns legally. If they did, they could be traced back to them. The statistics so oft quoted by the anti-gun left have all been proven to be outright liesand fabrications.
Every time I've called 911, I've been put on hold. Not a good thing when your life is on the line.
Good luck getting your separately secured gun, bolt, and ammo into play before a home invader kills you. At least you can die knowing that you did the "right thing" as defined by the left.
Tasers are as useless as tits on a mule. I've been hit with a taser. It hurt, but didn't incapacitate me. I've also been hit with every stun gun I can come across at gun shows. It's the ultimate test of whether or not they work.
Cattle prods are much more effective than tasers/stun guns.
And, yes, it was the most recent model of taser. I was not impressed.
Electricity affects everyone differently, due to differing internal resistance, which is why you can't count on a taser.
You'd be better off with a full auto paintball gun loaded with the OC balls.
That or a shotgun loaded with less than lethal ammo such as bean bag rounds.
Legally, hacking someone to death is about as easily explained to the police, prosecutor, and jury as roasting them with a flame thrower.
If you're close enough to them to hack them up, they are close enough to you to do the same. Then you have differences in strength and agility in people. The bad guy may just be more of a badass then you are.
Martial arts will get your ass killed. They only work against someone fighting the same way as you. Criminals don't obey the rules of martial arts contests.
Meth turns people into monsters. You don't want to fight a methed up monster with your hands, a club, or a knife.
If you must use an edged weapon, you'd be better off with a short sword like a Tarwar or Wajaski.