- Joined
- Aug 24, 1999
- Messages
- 2,271
Hi All,
The issue of knife nomenclature (or is it knomenclature
) comes up quite a bit...people often make the point that it is cheesey marketing to use a name like "Ninja Killer", not to mention that it probably wouldn't be well received in court. But isn't it ok to do a little marketing? What's the best convention? Some makers/manufacturers use numbers (e.g. Benchmade 710), some use acronyms (e.g. Strider AR or Terzuola ATCF), some use colourful descriptives (Hammond Flesh Eater), while still others use words that have significance in other languages (Chris Reeve Mnandi).
I think Busse is pretty good and I just came across another maker (Gene Martin) who displays quite a bit of originality ("Tough as a Boot").
One of my pet peeves is names that are almost impossible to pronounce (which is not very good in terms of marketing, IMHO). And then there is the issue of "originality"...no offense to any makers but how many "Operators" are there out there?? Finally, wouldn't it be great if the knife reminded you of its name (e.g. you look at the knife and say "yeah, that does remind me of a Hurricane")
So, which maker or manufacturer is the best at the "name game" in your opinion?
RL
The issue of knife nomenclature (or is it knomenclature

I think Busse is pretty good and I just came across another maker (Gene Martin) who displays quite a bit of originality ("Tough as a Boot").
One of my pet peeves is names that are almost impossible to pronounce (which is not very good in terms of marketing, IMHO). And then there is the issue of "originality"...no offense to any makers but how many "Operators" are there out there?? Finally, wouldn't it be great if the knife reminded you of its name (e.g. you look at the knife and say "yeah, that does remind me of a Hurricane")
So, which maker or manufacturer is the best at the "name game" in your opinion?
RL