Blue Steel vs White Steel

Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
225
Hey everyone, I will (hopefully) be buying a new blade soon. I was looking at this one and I really like it, and yes I realize that the American tanto design is not the most... efficent. http://www.knifecenter.com/kc_new/store_detail.html?s=KT235

That would be the knife.

My question is- What are the main differences and avantages that blue and white steel have over one another? Edge retention? Toughness? ect. Oh yes, and if anyone has any experence with this knife or any from the Kanetsune company, please share it.

Thank you all for your input, God bless.
 
That's Mn not Mg !... tungsten forms very wear resistant carbides !
 
Hiatchi white is sort of like an ultra clean super-1095. Blue is tougher with more fine carbides for great edge holding, somewhat similar to tool steels like 01 but very different in alloy. Both are usually hardened to around 64 rc, so even the low carbide hitachi white has great edge holding, I've noticed that my white #1 atsu deba is a bit prone to chipping if you're careless when cutting chicken bones, I would expect blue to be a bit more resilient. Sorry i don't have charts and graphs to back this up :p
 
So blue tends to take a more "toothy" edge and white can take a finer smoother one? Can blue take a wicked sharp edge? Thanks guys.
 
Why dont American makers use these steels, or if they do, I never hear about it. I know they arent for chopping, but they dont seem too brittle either...
 
From what I've read, the Japanese are very particular about who uses their steels and where. One of the reasons Spyderco's VG-10 and H1 knives are made in Seki is that the companies who produce the steel want to keep production in-country where they can keep an eye on it. If I were a custom knifemaker here in the US, it would be very difficult to get my hands on some H1 stock. That's what I've read, if anybody knows different please chime in as I'm curious about this as well.
 
Blue is not tougher than white steel, it is more brittle and much more wear resistant. Because of the high carbon in both neither is all that tough though. They are designed purely for cutting performance.
 
See now, I'm getting different info here...

Hiatchi white is sort of like an ultra clean super-1095. Blue is tougher with more fine carbides for great edge holding, somewhat similar to tool steels like 01 but very different in alloy. Both are usually hardened to around 64 rc, so even the low carbide hitachi white has great edge holding, I've noticed that my white #1 atsu deba is a bit prone to chipping if you're careless when cutting chicken bones, I would expect blue to be a bit more resilient. Sorry i don't have charts and graphs to back this up :p
and

Blue is not tougher than white steel, it is more brittle and much more wear resistant. Because of the high carbon in both neither is all that tough though. They are designed purely for cutting performance.

Is blue tougher than white?
 
As far as blue steel goes my info is all 2nd hand internet research, but the general concensus I've found is that blue is the tougher steel, though "super blue" with it's very high alloy content may be a bit more brittle.
 
It is a common misconception that the tungsten adds toughness to the Blue steels. As mete says, the tungsten forms wear resistant carbides and increases the overall carbide volume. The greater carbide volume increases wear resistance and lowers the toughness.
 
Heat treatment of blue steel is easier compared to white.
In Japan, both are used in welded form, I mean san-mai and so on.
 
so for an outdoors knife, blue is better

and for a pure cutter, never prying, hacking or batonning, white is better?
 
Seems that with those Tungsten carbides the blue will keep cutting even after its a wee bit dull... I looked and really couldnt find anything, but I would like to know if anyone can vouch for Kanetsune's quality, and share any experences with the knives?
Thanks
 
Back
Top