Bradley Alias II

Joined
Dec 27, 2004
Messages
1,500
Introduction

Bradley Cutlery (http://www.bradleycutlery.com/) is a new player on the scene. They currently have two models, the Alias I and Alias II, both manufactured by Benchmade to Bradley's design. There's been a lot of talk about these knives lately, that they're essentially clones of the Chris Reeve Knives Sebenza. I'll get to that, but it's only fair to look at the Alias on it's own terms first.


First Impressions

When I first got the Alias II, I was surprised by the size; I was expecting the larger model! Duh. The two models differ only in size; the Alias II is little more than a scaled-down copy of the Alias I. The Alias II has a 3" blade, while the Alias I sports 3.6" of the same premium S30V steel. Oddly, both models have the same blade thickness (0.12" or 3mm), so the smaller blade of the Alias II seems quite sturdy for a knife this size. The primary grind is a flat saber grind with a deep swedge, which keeps the full stock thickness out to within less than an inch of the point, for a strong, rigid blade.

IMG_4172_1.jpg


The handle is well shaped, and fits the hand well for such a small knife. The handle is curved to fit the hand, and there's a slight finger choil where you disengage the frame lock, but it's not as positive as most recent Spyderco models; there's no secondary choil at the blade ricasso, but on a knife this size, that's not really a problem. Balance is right at the choil. The handle is also relieved slightly near the choil on the front side, to give better access to the thumbstud.

Unfortunately, the thumbstud is right-hand-only; would it kill them to put an ambidextrous stud? On the plus side, the pocket clip is user-changeable to tip-up or tip-down carry, but still right-hand only. Sorry, southpaws.

IMG_4171.jpg


The frame lock is well done; there's plenty of engagement between the lock and blade tang, yet even after high grip pressure, it unlocks easily. The lower edge of the lock bar is scallopped to provide excellent traction for your thumb. This example isn't new and the lock engages a little more than half the tang thickness at this point. The tang end is radiused, not just angled, so it will take a lot more wear before it gets to 100% of the tang width.

IMG_4170.jpg


The rear of the blade spine is grooved for traction, although the grooves aren't bevelled on the sides like the Sebenza. Oops, I wasn't going to go there yet. Oh well, since I'm comparing to the Sebenza, here's one more: the edges of the handle slabs have a rounded bevel all around, but lack the Sebenza's longitudinal grooves, and the bevel isn't quite as rounded, either. Still, it's more comfy to use than the old Pinnacle, with it's squared-off edges.


In Use

The Alias II handled well for it's size. My small-to-medium hands fit all four fingers on the handle, but just barely, with the pinky just wrapping around the end. Still, despite the lack of a deep choil or pinky hook, the grip always felt secure. It's not as thin as, say, Spyderco's small steel-frame designs, but thinner than, say, the Benchmade 705.

I gave it a whirl in the kitchen, slicing and chopping onions, coring and slicing peppers, wedging limes, cubing meat, etc., and the drop-point blade handled nicely. Despite the relatively thick blade, it sliced through single-thickness corrugated cardboard better than many larger knives I've tested; it tended to bind up in heavier thicknesses, though, and the small handle made it difficult to really bear down in comfort. Still, pretty impressive for a little knife.

IMG_4164.jpg



Sebenza Clone?

Benchmade has tried to imitate the Sebenza before, with their Pinnacle model, and while it was a good sturdy knife in it's own right, it didn't match the smoothness, comfort and elegance of the original. They've also produced the Blackwood-designed 630 Skirmish and 635 Mini Skirmish, which share the same solid-titanium frame and lock as the Pinnacle, but have much deeper recurved blades and drastically more exotic lines.

IMG_4169.jpg

(Top to bottom: Benchmade 750 Pinnacle, Bradley Alias II, Benchmade 635 Mini Skirmish.)

A few of Bradley's design choices do seem deliberately "borrowed" from the Chris Reeve design: the matte grey titanium handle slabs; the integral frame lock ("Monolock" in Benchmade/Bradley parlance), pioneered by CRK; even the blue-anodized thumbstud and frame spacers add to the visual similarity.

But there are significant differences as well: the blade pivot (typical adjustable pivot screw, vs. CRK pivot bushing); the blade grind (flat saber grind with deep swedge, rather than the CRK's hollow grind); and the blade finish (satin, rather than stonewashed).

I think a lot of people are missing the real sources of this design: the blade shape is nearly identical to the Benchmade Ares knives (730/732/735), while the frame shape looks a lot like some of the Osborne-designed Benchmade models. The pocket clip is Benchmade's "split arrow" clip, identical to the one used on several recent BM models. Overall, this Alias II resembles more than anything a 705 McHenry & Williams with solid titanium scales. Sebenza clone? Only superficially, IMHO.

IMG_4172.jpg

(Top to bottom: Benchmade 730 Ares, Bradley Alias II, Benchmade 770 Osborne Carbon Fiber.)

Then there's the matter of price. The Alias II can be found for about $200; the larger Alias I for about $40 more. Compared to a $385 Large Sebenza or $330 Small Sebenza, it seems like a bargain. But, you can also get a Benchmade Skirmish or Mini Skirmish, with the same premium blade steel, solid titanium frame, frame lock, and equivalent fit & finish, for a bit over $100. Looking at it that way, the Bradley seems a little pricey.


Conclusion

Don't get me wrong, the Bradley Alias is an impressive knife. If you like the Ares blade shape (and a lot of Ares fans consider it nearly perfect) and lightweight, grippy titanium handles, but think the Skirmish is a bit too "out there" for your taste, the Alias might be the knife of your dreams. But don't think you're getting a bargain-priced Sebenza. In fact, you might want to wait and see if the price comes down a bit.
 
Great review! I personally really like the Alias 1 & 2. I LOVE the feel of titanium in my hand. AND, framelocks are MY favorite!!
 
Gryffin said:
...
I gave it a whirl in the kitchen, slicing and chopping onions, coring and slicing peppers, wedging limes, cubing meat, etc., and the drop-point blade handled nicely. Despite the relatively thick blade, it sliced through single-thickness corrugated cardboard better than many larger knives I've tested; it tended to bind up in heavier thicknesses, though, and the small handle made it difficult to really bear down in comfort.

How is this compared to the Sebenza? Edge retention / ease of sharpening?

But, you can also get a Benchmade Skirmish or Mini Skirmish, with the same premium blade steel, solid titanium frame, frame lock, and equivalent fit & finish, for a bit over $100. Looking at it that way, the Bradley seems a little pricey.

Yeah, stjames pointed that out, kind of hard to argue the price.

-Cliff
 
I think implications that it is a Sebenza copy are unfair. They might have the same category of construction (titanium framelock), but the unique shape of the Sebenza is fairly subtle. Small but uniques curves and angles make it unique from, say, a Bucklock, and those curves and angles are different on the Bradley. It's just a drop point blade with a fairly simple handle.

The Sebenza's blade humps up past the handle, if just a little, while the Bradley is more directly inline. The Sebenza handle gets larger towards the back, while the Bradley appears to get smaller just a little. The front choil on the Sebenza is obviously meant to have two fingers, while the Bradley's front choil looks like it only has room for one. It seems like those three things are the most basic aspects of the Sebenza design, and they are different.

I will make the overstated observation that the central choil corner was taken from the classic Bucklock pattern (or maybe before that, but the Bucklock is the earliest I can think of) and the idea of a blade hump accomodating an opening device was taken from Spyderco or earlier.
 
Cliff Stamp said:
How is this compared to the Sebenza?
Kinda hard to compare directly, since the Alias II is so small, and my limited experience with the Sebenze was with a large model.

As I've mentioned in a couple other reviews, corrugated cardboard is a weird testing medium. Flat-ground blades that slice superbly in other materials often bind up in it. I believe that's because cardboard is so abrasive; the deeper the primary grind, the more cardboard-to-blade contact area, and the more friction, and hence the more drag on the blade.

The Bradley really cut cardboard well, with that small, saber-ground blade, better than I would've predicted. The Sebenza, with it's high hollow grind, did very well too; I suspect that the hollow grind helps, by reducing friction to the very edge, and the upper grind line.


Cliff Stamp said:
Edge retention / ease of sharpening?
I didn't get a chance to use it enough to dull it. Even after my cardboard testing, it needed just a little stropping. The blade is S30V, and Benchmade has a good track record with heat treating high-end steels, so I expect it'll hold an edge very well indeed.
 
Carl64 said:
I think implications that it is a Sebenza copy are unfair.
Unfair? I dunno, Bradley's choice of finishes seems to invite comparison, even though it's only cosmetic. (Blue thumb stud? Please!)

What struck me is how many other designs Bradley borrowed from. The knife as a whole is rather derivative, when you get down to it, but you have to admit, they borrowed from the best! And besides, there are only so many different blade grinds, only so many ergonomic handle shapes, only so many finishes that appeal to the market... you get the idea. Today's best knife designs are all built on the designs that came before.
 
Nice review, Gryffin!

While I was struck by the Sebenza Clone aspect, I dunno, I also thought it was a right nice carry at an affordible price.
Good pics too :)
Tom
 
My review is not so positive:

OK I just took it apart Two T6 torx in the tail and one T9 torx for the pivot. Indeed the stop pin has a larger diameter in the center so it just "floats" in between the handle sides. There's two bronze washers but I would guess they are 30% smaller then a small sebenza washers. I'm not sure what you call the pivot screw, but it's just like others one side is a screw, the other is a barrel with threads inside.

As I guessed there is no pivot bushing, what that means is that when you tighten the pivot, it puts increasing pressure on the blade washer sandwich. Tightening the pivot then takes up lateral play in the sandwich, the problem is, as I've said before, you now have to balance ease of opening versus no play. As far as I'm concerned any knife over $100 better have a bushing, or it's a wanna be.

I will say that if the washer area was increased then that might help ease the opening tension at high tightness, but in the current design it can't be increased because the way the handle and lock are cut. That is there just isn't enough room for bigger washers.

I also think the thumb stud is a poor design. It's not meant to be a thumb directly on top as there is a point there, it also doesn't work that well as the thumb on the side pushing against the side to open as there really isn't a good traction groove on the thumb stud around it's midsection. There is closer toward the blade, but the relief channel in the handle needs cut deeper to easily get to that groove.

I don't know if Brad designed this or just asked Benchmade to make him a Ti handled knife with a blue thumbstud, but someone didn't do their design homework IMO.

I had a Buck Mayo 172, IMO that is a better designed knife at a lower price. If those are around $130 to $150 now, I would expect this knife to sell in the $100 range. This knife strongly reminds me of the CRKT S2 that came out several years ago. If I payed $180 or so for this knife I'd be highly pissed.

IMO this knife doesn't compare to sebenza at all, other the it has Ti sides and an s30v blade.
 
DaveH said:
As I guessed there is no pivot bushing, what that means is that when you tighten the pivot, it puts increasing pressure on the blade washer sandwich. Tightening the pivot then takes up lateral play in the sandwich, the problem is, as I've said before, you now have to balance ease of opening versus no play. As far as I'm concerned any knife over $100 better have a bushing, or it's a wanna be.

What exactly is the bushing? Like a tube set within the blade's pivot hole?

Are both of the washers the same size? They should make the one on the lock side small enough to fit, and the one on the other size large enough to reduce blade play. It's not as good as both washers being large, but it is still better than both being small.
 
DaveH said:
As far as I'm concerned any knife over $100 better have a bushing, or it's a wanna be.
Hmmm... You're gonna hafta get used to disappointment, then, because the *only* knives with that sort of bushing are the Sebenza and perhaps other Chris Reeve knives (I don't know for sure).

From an engineering standpoint, the Reeve bushing is a marvel of precision fitting. But it's got a downside, too: choice. Some people like their blades to flip out easily, like they're used to with their Axis locks; others like (or need) a tighter fit (like the folks up in Canada). The Reeve bushing gives everyone the same opening tension, no options.
 
yes, exactly the bushing is like a tube that fits over the pivot screw and limits how much you can tighten the pivot.

The bushing is really is something I look for. If it 's an inexpensive knife it's not a big deal, but i really hate having to either have a too tight knife or one with blade play.

But as is pointed out, folks like different things, I can respect that.
 
Gryffin said:
The Reeve bushing gives everyone the same opening tension, no options.

It doesn't have the dramatic range some knives have where they go from floppy to you can't move them, but if I rock mine solid tight the blade action gets reduced. It is variable, I can easily tighen it to the point where someone unfamiliar with inertial openings would have trouble trying to do so.

DaveH said:
...this knife doesn't compare to sebenza at all, other the it has Ti sides and an s30v blade.

Cutting ability/durability, tip penetration/strength, edge retention, ease of sharpening, handle ergonomics/security, etc. .

Carl64 said:
What exactly is the bushing? Like a tube set within the blade's pivot hole?

Yes. Ref :

http://www.chrisreeve.com/sebenzaclean.htm


-Cliff
 
Cliff Stamp said:
It doesn't have the dramatic range some knives have where they go from floppy to you can't move them, but if I rock mine solid tight the blade action gets reduced. It is variable, I can easily tighen it to the point where someone unfamiliar with inertial openings would have trouble trying to do so.
Well, I've only had one Sebenza to play with for any amount of time (the passaround one I reviewd), but that one could not be made "floppy" without leaving the pivot screw so loose that it might unscrew itself. The range of tension available was very limited indeed.
 
I can take the screws out of mine completely and the blade action isn't wobbly, it is very tight without them, everything fits together well. As noted it doesn't have the floppy action some blades can get if you loosen them fully. The force required to turn the blade does increase significantly though, it takes about 275 g applied to the stud to move it from the 90 degree position with a loosen screw and about 375 with a tight one. Easy enough to notice by hand. But yes, far less variation than with most blades.

-Cliff
 
DaveH said:
yes, exactly the bushing is like a tube that fits over the pivot screw and limits how much you can tighten the pivot.

I have seen knives like that, but I can't remember which ones they were. Not common.

They could also just make the female part of the pivot long enough to do the same thing, but maybe it's harder to make it exact. The sebenza take-apart Cliff just listed looks pretty good. I wish they had a different steel (not a huge s30v fan), because that assembly is making me want one. :)
 
Carl64 said:
I wish they had a different steel ...

Reeve does a decent job, it sharpens nicely, and if you like the performance of VG-10, ATS-34 and similar steels this won't be a disappointment. It won't impress you much either, it isn't any stronger or more durable, but has more wear resistance so does as well in some situations and better than others.

I don't mind the steel, I just wish it was ran harder to raise the strength so it would have a broader scope of work and better edge retention. I also find the edge inconsistent in design, the angle is the same as you would find on a splitting maul and the edge thickness that of a fillet blade.

It doesn't take much to fix this though, a few minutes on a SiC hone is all it takes to hack the shoulder off and get a Spyderco level profile, I went more acute on mine specifically to compare it to a few of Alvin's knives to check some of the comments he made about 1095 vs ATS-34 in regards to fine edges.

-Cliff
 
Back
Top