Brass knuckles in CA?

Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
687
I was reading through the penal code, and it defines knuckles as: "As used in this section, "metal knuckles" means any device or instrument made wholly or partially of metal which is worn for purposes of offense or defense in or on the hand and which either protects the wearer's hand while striking a blow or increases the force of impact from the blow or injury to the individual receiving the blow. The metal contained in the device may help support the hand or fist, provide a shield to protect it, or consist of projections or studs which would contact the individual receiving a blow."

So doesn't that mean if they're made of carbon fiber or wood, or any other non-metallic material they're legal?
 
Check to see if they have a "dangerous weapon" clause; it usually encompasses things they neglect to specifically mention. Part of the reason metal knuckle dusters are soo damage-inducing, however, is the fact that they ARE metal. Its a combination of the hard material, and the weight behind it, that causes a strike to be so devastating. Without the weight of metal, the only real purpose of using knuckles would be to protect your fist IMO. Easier just to avoid trouble :)
 
Nice try. CA already closed that loophole with these two statutes:
16680. As used in this part, "hard wooden knuckles" means any
device or instrument made wholly or partially of wood or paper
products that is not metal knuckles, that is worn for purposes of
offense or defense in or on the hand, and that either protects the
wearer's hand while striking a blow, or increases the force of impact
from the blow or injury to the individual receiving the blow. The
composite materials, wood, or paper products contained in the device
may help support the hand or fist, provide a shield to protect it, or
consist of projections or studs that would contact the individual
receiving a blow.

16405. As used in this part, "composite knuckles" means any device
or instrument made wholly or partially of composite materials, other
than a medically prescribed prosthetic, that is not metal knuckles,
that is worn for purposes of offense or defense in or on the hand,
and that either protects the wearer's hand while striking a blow or
increases the force of impact from the blow or injury to the
individual receiving the blow.

21710. Any person in this state who possesses, commercially
manufactures or causes to be commercially manufactured, or who
knowingly imports into the state for commercial sale, keeps for
commercial sale, or offers or exposes for commercial sale, any
composite knuckles or hard wooden knuckles is guilty of a
misdemeanor.
 
Wow, based on the descriptions above my sportbike gloves are illegal. I find that a bit amusing and completely ridiculous.
 
This has been a very helpful thread! Figured I'd bump it back up with a question that may be relevant to many people these days, considering how much knucks have blown up lately...

Where do you guys think items like the Snailor, Beer Defender, or the many other 1-2 finger bottle-opening knucks fit into all this? I'd like to be able to enjoy these items on my key ring, as part of my edc. Honestly, I don't really even drink much these days. I've never been in a fight (outside of non-personal punk show violence), and don't intend to ever get into any. But I like knives, and gear, and titanium - oh, I really love titanium...even more so if I can carry it around with me.

I'd say I'm a pretty mellow guy. I've been a CA medical cannabis patient for 10 years now but I respect laws about medicating - keep it at home, etc. I have tamed the automotive enthusiast that lives inside of me and obey driving laws. I maybe drink 3-6 times a year and I'm definitely never driving on those rare nights. I try to behave myself..

Having said all this, do you think I would have a problem throwing a 1-2 finger knuck on my key-ring?

Thanks :)
 
This has been a very helpful thread! Figured I'd bump it back up with a question that may be relevant to many people these days, considering how much knucks have blown up lately...

Where do you guys think items like the Snailor, Beer Defender, or the many other 1-2 finger bottle-opening knucks fit into all this? I'd like to be able to enjoy these items on my key ring, as part of my edc. Honestly, I don't really even drink much these days. I've never been in a fight (outside of non-personal punk show violence), and don't intend to ever get into any. But I like knives, and gear, and titanium - oh, I really love titanium...even more so if I can carry it around with me.

I'd say I'm a pretty mellow guy. I've been a CA medical cannabis patient for 10 years now but I respect laws about medicating - keep it at home, etc. I have tamed the automotive enthusiast that lives inside of me and obey driving laws. I maybe drink 3-6 times a year and I'm definitely never driving on those rare nights. I try to behave myself..

Having said all this, do you think I would have a problem throwing a 1-2 finger knuck on my key-ring?

Thanks :)

While I did respond to this thread years ago, this is bladeforums so don't be surprised if this thread get's deleted or locked.

CA state law, as stated above, does not care how many fingers a knuck covers. The only real value to these items is that they may have plausible deniability if found by someone who doesn't recognize them for what they are. But cops are not stupid and do read up on stuff like this, and many will probably recognize them.

I do not like knucks in general as defensive items. They take too long to ready unless you're the aggressor, and are designed to concentrate the impact, rather than spread it out. That's good if you want to kill someone or break their bones because they owe you money, but not so good for knocking them out without causing an intracranial bleedout. I prefer the kubotan (or a steel pen), the yawara, the expandable baton, or my cane if I want to use an impact weapon.
 
This has been a very helpful thread! Figured I'd bump it back up with a question that may be relevant to many people these days, considering how much knucks have blown up lately...

Where do you guys think items like the Snailor, Beer Defender, or the many other 1-2 finger bottle-opening knucks fit into all this? I'd like to be able to enjoy these items on my key ring, as part of my edc. Honestly, I don't really even drink much these days. I've never been in a fight (outside of non-personal punk show violence), and don't intend to ever get into any. But I like knives, and gear, and titanium - oh, I really love titanium...even more so if I can carry it around with me.

I'd say I'm a pretty mellow guy. I've been a CA medical cannabis patient for 10 years now but I respect laws about medicating - keep it at home, etc. I have tamed the automotive enthusiast that lives inside of me and obey driving laws. I maybe drink 3-6 times a year and I'm definitely never driving on those rare nights. I try to behave myself..

Having said all this, do you think I would have a problem throwing a 1-2 finger knuck on my key-ring?

Thanks :)
What you are talking about is "testing" the law. And that's a good way to wind up in trouble.

What we here on this forum think about the legality of one or two-fingered knuckles is meaningless. What matters is what the cop who finds them on you thinks, what your prosecutor thinks if you are arrested, what a judge thinks, and what a jury might think. And speaking as someone who has been through the California criminal justice system, I certainly wouldn't expect any of them to go easy on you.

If the item can be clearly identified as a weapon, either by it's design or by the language the manufacturer uses to advertise it, mere possession could get you arrested and later charged. And if you were ever to use it as a weapon, using an ILLEGAL weapon could make it very easy for a prosecutor to convince a jury that you are a criminal, and that you had criminal intent when you were carrying the ILLEGAL weapon.

And if you use a weapon in self-defense, don't for one second expect that the cops, prosecutor, judge, or jury will automatically believe that you were acting in self-defense, because they weren't there, and they don't know you. But the fact that you were carrying an ILLEGAL weapon might very well give the impression that you might have been the aggressor.

Also, don't expect cops/prosecutor/judge/jury to just take your word for it that the item in question is a bottle-opener, necklace, or some other innocent item. What you call it doesn't matter nearly as much as what they choose to call it.

While the chances of being caught carrying such an item might be very remote, consider what you have to lose by "testing" the law if you are caught. Can you afford to go to jail for a while? Can you afford bail? Can you afford to miss work or school? Can you afford a lawyer? Can you afford fines and court costs? And how would you be affected by having a criminal record?

And if you are convicted of a weapons offense, even a misdemeanor, and if you are placed on probation, you will be prohibited from possessing anything that your probation officer considers to be a weapon for the duration of your probation, and that generally includes all knives (excluding kitchen knives), as well as all firearms. Typical probation is three years. And there are probation fees that you would have to pay.

All in all, I'd say that you have a lot more to lose by testing the law and carrying a one or two-fingered knuckle, than you would ever stand to gain.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the responses :thumbup:

I wasn't fully clear if there was any kind of distinction between 1-2-3-4 finger knucks but based on your responses and reading the law again, it seems like they're all the same in the eye of the law.

Yeah, I do realize the consequences are totally not worth it. I also completely agree that knucks are terrible defensive (or offensive) options. As I said, I'm not a fighter anyway so I know I'd never actually even think to use them: the desire to carry such items is related to the getting a similar kind of pleasure that I get from handling and using a nice quality knife, or admiring a precious stone or piece of art.

The reality is that if I can't carry them around without risk of serious legal trouble, then I simply won't.

:cheers:
 
By the sounds of the statutes posted above its legal to own and carry Knucks but if used during a crime then it's another charge they can slap on top. Take that with a grain of salt as I'm no lawyer and don't live in Cali.
 
By the sounds of the statutes posted above its legal to own and carry Knucks but if used during a crime then it's another charge they can slap on top. Take that with a grain of salt as I'm no lawyer and don't live in Cali.
Nope, it is illegal to merely possess them.

In post number 3 Glistam provided California penal code 21710 which covers non-metal knuckles. And it reads- "Any person in this state who possesses...composite knuckles or hard wooden knuckles is guilty of a misdemeanor".

And CA penal code 21810 says the same thing about metal knuckles- http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PEN&sectionNum=21810

California law is very clear on the illegality of possessing such items.
 
Nope, it is illegal to merely possess them.

In post number 3 Glistam provided California penal code 21710 which covers non-metal knuckles. And it reads- "Any person in this state who possesses...composite knuckles or hard wooden knuckles is guilty of a misdemeanor".

And CA penal code 21810 says the same thing about metal knuckles- http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PEN&sectionNum=21810

California law is very clear on the illegality of possessing such items.

Why do they limit the law to 3 materials.
Surely some creative types could come up with other material than metal, composites or hard wood.
I mean Hardwood? Why not be even more specific? ;)
Why not just wood?
Is soft wood with glass studs legal?
Why not ban any knuckles? Do they encourage some made out of bone or horn?
Usually laws are quite vague but this one is strangely specific.
 
Back
Top