- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
- Messages
- 2,826
After watching the videos of BUCK Hoodlum blades snapping off after being driven into logs in batoning tests, it's obvious to me that he breakage always begins at the bottom of the notch and extends to the edge of the blade. I've got two of these knives and have one packed in my bugout bag. But it's mostly for self defense and whatever other uses one might have for a knife. Even so, I have no use for the controversial notch except, of course, its exceptional beauty and touch of class.
The question is, I've always considered the Hoodlum as a lightweight. The flat grind knives are lightweight and the life is light in the hand. It's a poor chopper but has excellent reach. It's never surprised me that the things break when splitting logs, but it has surprised me that BUCK continues to keep the notch when no one but Ron Hood's family seems to want it (and then more as a tribute than for utility). There's been some discussion that the notches were initially laser cut. Then they tried milling the blades to correct the problem; however, I'd say it's the notch itself that's the problem. My question is to owners and users, which is more important -- batoning or being able to conveniently lift a pot off a fire? And if the former, wouldn't outdoorsmen prefer a knife that isn't a flat grind?
If I were going to do a lot of chopping, I'd take a knife like an Ontario Marine Raider, or better, a hatchet. Even a flat grind knife like the Ka-Bar Large Heavy Bowie doesn't usually break, but the blade has a thicker spine and is broader. Still, it's not considered a great chopper, but has been used widely for batoning. But even the Hoodlum can do a fair amount of batoning based on what I've seen on the YouTube videos. The ones that have broken, to me, seem to be pretty well beaten to pieces.
So what's the real story behind the notch? Is it being kept largely for sentimental reasons? How many of you guys think the notch should stay, and how many of you think the notch should go? Also, should a knife the size and weight of the Hoodlum be expected to baton? Finally, how many of you have either not bought a Hoodlum, or not kept yours because of the notch?
The reason I ask is because I got one of those controversial D2 knives on auction, and two of them have sawtooth tops, each of which looks very similar to the notch on the Hoodlum! Then I thought if BUCK put sawtooths on the Hoodlum, it not only would look better than a single notch, one could get a pot off the fire with any of the notches! As for grip and handling, the D2 model below (if D2 it really is) is the most comfortable knife of the two.

The question is, I've always considered the Hoodlum as a lightweight. The flat grind knives are lightweight and the life is light in the hand. It's a poor chopper but has excellent reach. It's never surprised me that the things break when splitting logs, but it has surprised me that BUCK continues to keep the notch when no one but Ron Hood's family seems to want it (and then more as a tribute than for utility). There's been some discussion that the notches were initially laser cut. Then they tried milling the blades to correct the problem; however, I'd say it's the notch itself that's the problem. My question is to owners and users, which is more important -- batoning or being able to conveniently lift a pot off a fire? And if the former, wouldn't outdoorsmen prefer a knife that isn't a flat grind?
If I were going to do a lot of chopping, I'd take a knife like an Ontario Marine Raider, or better, a hatchet. Even a flat grind knife like the Ka-Bar Large Heavy Bowie doesn't usually break, but the blade has a thicker spine and is broader. Still, it's not considered a great chopper, but has been used widely for batoning. But even the Hoodlum can do a fair amount of batoning based on what I've seen on the YouTube videos. The ones that have broken, to me, seem to be pretty well beaten to pieces.
So what's the real story behind the notch? Is it being kept largely for sentimental reasons? How many of you guys think the notch should stay, and how many of you think the notch should go? Also, should a knife the size and weight of the Hoodlum be expected to baton? Finally, how many of you have either not bought a Hoodlum, or not kept yours because of the notch?
The reason I ask is because I got one of those controversial D2 knives on auction, and two of them have sawtooth tops, each of which looks very similar to the notch on the Hoodlum! Then I thought if BUCK put sawtooths on the Hoodlum, it not only would look better than a single notch, one could get a pot off the fire with any of the notches! As for grip and handling, the D2 model below (if D2 it really is) is the most comfortable knife of the two.
