wow, this seems to be really popular, I'm surprized k390 is holding up as well as reported...
thing is, if you have cpm-m4, it feels like it stays sharp forever (imho)
I honestly don't think I need higher edge retention
so you guys go 2 months between sharpening? 4 months? half year?... honestly curious
K390 is an awesome cutlery steel for folders and makes perfect sense to me to be the next 'common super steel' IMHO.
I have a much carried and used Urban Light Weight K390 that has yet to show a single spot of rust, yet I live near the sea where the air is salty and humid. So, while not a “stainless” steel, it resists rust pretty well.A K390 uncoated blade will rust easily and for an EDC it's not convenient so I will not buy a K390 knife if it's not DLC.
I hope Spyderco will offer the DLC option for interested buyers.
The Police was one of the first K390 models Spyderco offered, going back a few years. I recall people complaining about lock rock, but otherwise a great knife.Has anyone gotten their hands on a K390 Police? I am waiting for Knifecenter to fulfill my pre-order for one and am anxious to know what others think about it.
I've always understood 10V to be very similar to K390 in performance, so it would be in the same ballpark. I would be hesitant to assume you can extrapolate accurate numbers the way you are asking though.
Is there any reason you need specific numbers rather than an approximate expectation of what it would be capable of? Are you planning on doing some tests or usage that will push performance close to where it will fail?
I am just saying I personally would be hesitant to say extrapolating from that would give me much confidence of an accurate figure, given that you are going off data from one random source that doesn't seem to offer much information as to how scientifically the test was carried out, then combining results with someone else's tests doesn't strike me as having much of a chance of getting an accurate result. Just my opinion. You can do what you wish, but given you have asked for exact numbers, it would seem odd(to me) to take that as a baseline.Thanks! Do you have a rationale why extrapolation might not work, or is this a general caution against extrapolation? (BTW, it's not "my" extrapolation, it's CM Bushman's.)
LOL. Maybe someone else has this information and is willing to share it with you.Yes, I have several reasons for wanting that number, and so far, Larrin doesn't supply it (or I missed it). I was not aware that such knowledge was on a "need to know" basis.
I am just saying I personally would be hesitant to say extrapolating from that would give me much confidence of an accurate figure, given that you are going off data from one random source that doesn't seem to offer much information as to how scientifically the test was carried out, then combining results with someone else's tests doesn't strike me as having much of a chance of getting an accurate result. Just my opinion.