Clay coating blades

Stacy E. Apelt - Bladesmith

ilmarinen - MODERATOR
Moderator
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
37,721
I had a member send me a request for some help and info. As always I suspect there are others who have the same problems, so I will post my email answer to the question on the problem with the clay popping off the blade.

I would also like to make a note that when asking/posting a quire, give all information. The answer is tailored to the specific parameters ,usually.

Quote from reply:
You need to give me more information about the clay, the metal,the blade type, how you will be doing the HT, and how you are putting the clay on.

I will tell you how I do it and maybe that will help.
I use satanite mainly, and APG#36 other times. The satanite works well for detailed hamon, and the APG36 for differential hardening/standard hamon. They are probably interchangeable,though.
I first make a thin mix (about like thin pancake batter) and coat the entire blade. Let it dry, or use a hair dryer or torch to speed it along. When dry, coat with a thicker mix ( somewhere around the thickness of sour cream). If you are looking for a standard hamon, coat the whole blade with about 1/8" to 3/16" of clay - coat it evenly.Use your finger to wipe off the blade edge where you want the martensite to form. Let dry slowly, or use a hair dryer to aid it (I let it dry overnight often, but sometimes gently use a torch when in a hurry). When ready to harden, bring the blade slowly up to about 400F (200C), to make the clay dry and set it hard. Bring the blade up to austenitization temperature and soak for the required time. The clay will be fine at the high temps , if the clay starts out fully dry, it will become almost like ceramic above 1200F (650C).

The main places to look for problems are:
The steel type - shallow hardening, simple alloy - 1060-1095, W1,W2
The clay - any hard drying , high temperature clay - satanite, APG36, fireplace mortar ( not field clay or modeling clay)
The drying - make sure it is fully dry before applying high heat, or it will crack and pop off. If properly dried and fired, it may remain on the blade even after quench. If accelerating the drying ,go slow. You don't want the water in the clay mix to boil, just to evaporate.
The heat source - a forge or oven that can apply even heating. A torch or small forge (one brick) is not usually suitable for clay blades.
The blade surface - it should be CLEANED THOROUGHLY - clean with soap and water and then with Windex. Apply the wash of thin clay and scrub it on with your fingers. The wash layer must be dry completely before applying the main clay coat.
Application - use your fingers for a lot of the work ( It is a caustic mix, so wash right away when done, or wear rubber gloves). A Popsicle stick/tongue depressor works perfect for spreading an even layer. Don't make it too thick. Extra clay will cause problems. As little as 1/16" will make a hamon. 1/8" is fine. 3/16" is plenty.
Drying too fast - Go slow, boiling the water ( in the clay mix) is the number one cause of the clay lifting off the blade.

Hope this helps. Email me with more info or questions if you still need more help.
Stacy
 
I put my clay on wet and go right into the oven. Have never had any fall off, or any adverse reactions to the heat.
Take blade to nicely rubbed-out 220 grit and apply clay, stick in oven.
This is using Satanite.
I have found that the wash-coat to prevent scaling also contributes to preventing hardening! I've eliminated the wash coat and left a few extra .001ths for removal. Much harder blades.
 
I don't do the full clay wash, but instead heat my blades warm to the touch, and apply the clay wet. I then use a torch to slowly and evenly heat the blade and then let it cool until the clay is dry. It changes color as it dries. Sometimes I wait overnight, other times I put it in the oven and let it come up to temp. Never really had a problem with clay lifting off the blade.

Apply any pattern symmetrically from both sides. I try to picture where the clay will push the hamon and think of the whole process as creating a thunderstorm. You have a cold front coming from the edge side and cooling up the blade, and you have a thermal mass of clay insulating the blade and pushing down from the top. When that critical point in time comes, wherever those two fronts are meeting will be the hamon.

Hamons are a lot of trial and error and practice, but not rocket science. Getting the subtle action of a hamon to show properly is, however, a science. A quick etch and sanding will only revel the line, whereas more polishing and less sanding will really bring out what is going on...
 
We'll see how mine turns out using some Satanite on W2. I applied a little thick and let set overnight (approx 24 hours since I have to coach soccer and don't have time to fire up the forge earlier).
 
Careful putting it on too thick. Often the hamon follows the pattern of the clay, but if its too thick, it can push the hamon down too far and if it goes over the cutting edge, you are S.O.L. and will need to re-HT since the edge will be soft. Better to go thin than thick! Here's one of my early blades, and you can see the clay was very thick pre-HT and the resulting hamon was JUST high enough to be acceptable, but much lower than expected. (crazy action, though!)

Pre:
before.jpg

Post:
hamon2.jpg
 
Thanks for the tips gents. I've almost always had the clay pop off! I'll try it this way next time.
 
I'd be interested to know other Hamon-creators quench steps. I often edge quench, submerging the blade only deep enough that the highest exposed steel gets oil. Others seem to fully quench. I wonder how much this affects hamons since with an edge quech, you have quite a large mass of heat above the oil bleeding down into the blade whereas a full quench, that clay still masks the blade from hardening, but obviously doesnt stay as hot as long. Does this translate into full quench=higher hamon, edge quench=lower hamon? Ive made a lot of clay coated blades but have never done it in a full-experiement mode with the intent to study it beyond my techniques and results. Lately, i've mastered creating pretty nice hamons on small EDC blades that are 1/8" thick, 2" long and only about 3/4" high....
 
Wow, this is great! I was the lucky member who couldnt seem to get clay to work correctly. Stacy has been a great help to me, and seeing the pictures David posted is a big help as well! I have many more issues to work out with the process and again Stacy is helping me out there as well, so again a BIG thanks!

This is only my second knife and unfortunately I seem to like to bite off big chunks in projects and jump straight to the difficult part. Seems I would rather skip the boring easy parts and give my self a headache with the stuff that yields neater results.

I am also working with some pretty basic equipment. My forge is a paint can design using a JHT7 burner and I have a slightly modified Harbor Freight anvil to pound on. I added a plate of semi hardened steel to the top of the cast iron anvil, works pretty well as far as I can tell.
 
Ben,
If you had filled out your profile info, I would have known you lived 90 minutes up the road. When you are ready to HT the next blade with the steel I am sending you, you can bring it down here and we can do it in a full size forge.
Stacy
 
Ha! Wow, I coulda sworn I'd filled that thing out! That's a wonderful offer, and I will most definately take you up on it!

I might actually keep the next one... I gave the first one to my dad he liked it so much, and this one I'm giving to my brother when he has his kid in a month or so. I've kinda been experimenting with profiles and such trying to figure out what I want to make for myself. I have the feeling I'll end up making one and then deciding to make another and then another for some reason or other that I find I dislike about the first one.

Stacy, the 1084 and 1095, I'm gathering that most people get it in flatstock. The only stuff I've used so far has been the O1 in 1/2" round. Are there any techniques that are recommended for the hammering of flatstock? Seems that in my head the flatstock is more inclined to go to the grinder, but I rather enjoy the challenge of getting the shape I want by pounding on the steel. Something to be said about putting some sweat into it.
 
Well, on a sadder note, I don't think I'll be sending this current blade to anyone.... I'm just not comfortable with the HT. I tried the clay hardening and I'm just not sure if the edge is hardened so I think I'm just gonna test this blade to destruction and see what happens. My reasoning here is I can't get a hamon to show when etching. It could be one or two things, or even both really. I'm not positive the O1 was kept at critical long enough prior to quenching, and I may have kept the clay too close to the edge. I kept the blade at temperature for about 10 minutes and then dunked it in oil, same way I did my previous blade.

On the brighter side, this will give me some useful insight into what not to do next time!
 
If you read Stacey's post carefully the steel he recommends for clay coating-hammon production is:

The steel type - shallow hardening, simple alloy - 1060-1095, W1,W2

The hammon produced by O1 is much less active.

One member here does do a lot of O1 with a differential temper where the hardening line is visible. It’s not like the hamon that I believe you had in mind.

http://www.bgoodeknives.com/

http://www.bgoodeknives.com/images/biggles.jpg

Before destroying it, redo the heat treat. O1 heat treat can be redone a few times. You can still have a good performer on your hands.
 
If you read Stacey's post carefully the steel he recommends for clay coating-hammon production is:



The hammon produced by O1 is much less active.

One member here does do a lot of O1 with a differential temper where the hardening line is visible. It’s not like the hamon that I believe you had in mind.

http://www.bgoodeknives.com/

http://www.bgoodeknives.com/images/biggles.jpg

Before destroying it, redo the heat treat. O1 heat treat can be redone a few times. You can still have a good performer on your hands.


I understand that O1 doesn't produce a very distinct hamon, however I ended up with just general random spots and minor banding. I will retry the heat treat prior to destruction, might turnout ok.

Thanks for the link to that picture! It helps show me what to expect from the O1, and confirms that it's nothing like what I ended up with.

And thanks for the push in the right direction... UP!!!
 
While forging from round stock is fun, most steel is forged from flat stock. The same rules apply .The big thing to remember,especially with flat stock, is to put a downward curve to the blade when starting to form the bevels (to allow for the upward movement of the tip as the bevels form).As Steve said, O-1 doesn't always form much of a hamon. Also, the hamon may not show much until it is properly sanded to above 600 grit. Machine sanding, and buffing, can make some weak hamon disappear completely.I will cut some steel for you tomorrow that will form a great hamon.Walter Sorrels video on hamon and polishing is excellent information. I will loan you his DVD with the steel I'm sending.

Some tips on forming hamon:
Use a shallow hardening steel of simple formulation - 1060 thru 1095, W-1,W-2
If the blade was forged and you aren't sure of the grain structure, do a grain refinement series of heats.
Normalize/stress relieve the blade completely prior to HT.
Work the blade to a semi finished state, 220 to 400 grit finish, .040 edge.
Coat the blade with enough clay, but not too thick. 3/16" is fine.
Quench in fast oil or water/brine. There will be more cracked blades with water, but you will develop more active hamon.Using and interrupted quench develops the secondary hamon and the sori of the blade. It is not required, but seems to created more detail in the hamon.Parks/Brownell's/etc. fast quench oil will work.
After the initial clean up, hand sand or stone the blade.While the grinder will do the entire job, the results of hand finishing are worth the sweat ( a grinder may smear or blend the hamon badly).
Etch your blade in FC, vinegar, lemon juice, or other etchant prior to final hand finishing of the hamon.The details often don't show until the etch.Sometimes the hamon itself is barely visible until the blade nears completion of the polish.If you are going to specialize in Japanese style blades and hamon, putting together a polishing table and a set of stones is a worthwhile investment. It is not necessary to go to the extent of using Hazuya and Jizuya finger stones unless you are planing on getting into sword togi.A series of 4-5 synthetic water stones from 200 to 4000 and a good stack of wet or dry paper will do fine. It is more in the technique than the equipment.If you are going to spend big bucks on natural nagura, suita, and uchigumori, you should first be quite accomplished with the process on lesser stones.
Take your time.....there is no way to rush a hamon. It takes preparation, planning, practice (and some failures) ,and careful finishing to get those eye popping hamon. That comes with time. Time spent on hand finishing , and time spent on doing many blades.
Stacy
 
Wow! Stacy thank you very much! You've been a big help here with this, and I must say I'm quite looking forwards to the next blade when I have an excuse to drive down there and meet you.
 
Just to clarify something. A very light wash of clay on the blade WILL help harden the blade. There is an interesting paper from Japan that compares different thicknesses of clay starting from bare metal on up to 1 mm thick clay. The results were very interesting. Bare metal will harden as we know and expect but a very thin coat clay will make it harden even better. Once you get pass that very thin coat the effect is opposite and it will prevent hardening.
There is a reason for this phenomenon and that will be intuitive for those who think about what happens with the different phases of quenching (nucleation, boiling, convention, etc.)
 
Last edited:
Just to clarify something. A very light wash of clay on the blade WILL help harden the blade. There is an interesting paper from Japan that compares different thicknesses of clay starting from bare metal on up to 1 mm thick clay. The results were very interesting. Bare metal will harden as we know and expect but a very thin coat clay will make it harden even better. Once you get pass that very thin coat the effect is opposite and it will prevent hardening.
There is a reason for this phenomenon and that will be intuitive for those who think about what happens with the different phases of quenching (nucleation, boiling, convention, etc.)

I think that is true as well. I spent numerous conversations with Walter Sorrells on this subject. It seems that a light wash of clay increases the surface area - microscopically speaking - of the blade area thus increasing the amount of contact between quenchant and blade in improving heat transfer.
However, my shop has a poltergeist in it, and it just won't work in Illinois.
I'm kidding - sort of.
I think I may need to kick up my temp a little bit as I may have lost a little too much heat before I hit the quench.
More, later.
 
I think that is true as well. I spent numerous conversations with Walter Sorrells on this subject. It seems that a light wash of clay increases the surface area - microscopically speaking - of the blade area thus increasing the amount of contact between quenchant and blade in improving heat transfer.
However, my shop has a poltergeist in it, and it just won't work in Illinois.
I'm kidding - sort of.
I think I may need to kick up my temp a little bit as I may have lost a little too much heat before I hit the quench.
More, later.

Karl, you are going to watch out for those poltergeist. I personally use and recommend strongly a 0.000000001 namometer microporosity gel screen on the surface of the water when quenching so that any unusual phenomena is kept away while I am doing my ritualistic magnetically-correct and dust free dunk. ;)

Jokes aside, I believe that the nucleation phase is skipped altogether when a thin coat of clay is applied and so the heat extraction from the metal is more effective than when bare metal touches the water directly.

Here is a link to a chart from Tatsuo Inoue.

http://www.jsme.or.jp/tsd/ICBTT/conference02/TatsuoINOUE_p07a.html
 
Karl, you are going to watch out for those poltergeist. I personally use and recommend strongly a 0.000000001 namometer microporosity gel screen on the surface of the water when quenching so that any unusual phenomena is kept away while I am doing my ritualistic magnetically-correct and dust free dunk. ;)

Jokes aside, I believe that the nucleation phase is skipped altogether when a thin coat of clay is applied and so the heat extraction from the metal is more effective than when bare metal touches the water directly.

Here is a link to a chart from Tatsuo Inoue.

http://www.jsme.or.jp/tsd/ICBTT/conference02/TatsuoINOUE_p07a.html

You just touched on another subject - I don't use water, I'm using #50.
How do you think that affects the wash coat?
Where do you get one of those screens anyway? NASA?
 
Back
Top