None of my guns, LPs or knives which are "worth" somewhere around $200k altogether are specifically insured, except for the general personal property limits of my homeowner's policy which is over $600k and could provide full coverage as long as all of my receipts and photos of them aren't destroyed.
Why?
The way I look at it, if I needed the $ from these "things," I wouldn't have bought them in the 1st place or I'd sell them all now to recoup what I paid for them so that I can have the additional $ at hand but what's the point of that?
Everyone "needs" $ but how much enjoyment can just $ give you, if you've already got enough? Not much.
Also (because of their value) getting all of these things covered requires them to be specifically identified and scheduled, which I do not want to do w/my guns for privacy reasons, nor for my LPs and knives because there are so many and scheduling them (and updating the inventory) would just be PITA.
On top of that, I've paid SO MUCH $ for insurance for SO MANY things (including my life) that have never "paid off" that I view spending more for on insurance for such things as a "waste" of $ because I'm now at an age and have more than enough $ in cash on hand that it really makes no difference anymore.
After I die, my "heirs" (who are only my 2 grandchildren) will receive an inheritance by trust that will provide for them quite well w/o the additional $200k that I "might" be able to recover if everything (including me and my house) got torched in a fire.
So, I'm not worried and am comfortable self-insuring these "things," if they are not already covered under my homeowner's policy.