- Joined
- Jun 1, 2020
- Messages
- 158
Is it just me or is anyone else uneasy about this business of Wharncliffs for self-defense? I have several reasons for thinking this is a dead end fad:
1. There were few if any warnies used in historical times for combat. But people’s lives depended on blades back then. If it’s so good, why did no one use it?
2. When you cut with a normal curved tip, as the cutting edge slides away from the hand, the loss of leverage is cancelled by the increased cutting efficiency of the curve. Result is good slashing and cutting.
3. Slashing with a straight edge is likely to likelier to “stall” or hang up than with a curved edge. This was formerly thought to leave the slasher dangerously vulnerable.
4. A Wharncliff naturally has a fragile point. I remember when this too was thought to be a bad thing.
If you don’t believe me, here’s an interesting test you can do yourself, and it’s pretty general and repeatable.
Get a length of 1x2 Douglas fir at Home Depot or somewhere. Slice about 1” chips off the end. Compare a Wharncliff with an traditional blade like a PM2. See what I mean? The key here is that Doug fir is very hard and slicing chips off it takes a lot of force. How well a knife does in this test depends on thickness behind the edge, edge angle, blade shape, sharpness, and handle comfort. Edge holding will come into play in <10 slices, so beware if you keep your knives hair-shaving sharp.
1. There were few if any warnies used in historical times for combat. But people’s lives depended on blades back then. If it’s so good, why did no one use it?
2. When you cut with a normal curved tip, as the cutting edge slides away from the hand, the loss of leverage is cancelled by the increased cutting efficiency of the curve. Result is good slashing and cutting.
3. Slashing with a straight edge is likely to likelier to “stall” or hang up than with a curved edge. This was formerly thought to leave the slasher dangerously vulnerable.
4. A Wharncliff naturally has a fragile point. I remember when this too was thought to be a bad thing.
If you don’t believe me, here’s an interesting test you can do yourself, and it’s pretty general and repeatable.
Get a length of 1x2 Douglas fir at Home Depot or somewhere. Slice about 1” chips off the end. Compare a Wharncliff with an traditional blade like a PM2. See what I mean? The key here is that Doug fir is very hard and slicing chips off it takes a lot of force. How well a knife does in this test depends on thickness behind the edge, edge angle, blade shape, sharpness, and handle comfort. Edge holding will come into play in <10 slices, so beware if you keep your knives hair-shaving sharp.