Austin - i have fairly frequently chimed in here regarding original make versus long term “maintainability”. That had ... upset ... some people. But heck - here i go again.

. Honestly, i think the answer is likely mixed. Others here have way more experience than me ... but my experience is that, as stacy said, with a really thin primary bevel, the actual edge is almost invisible. My guess is that with repeated sharpenings, a thin primary will keep that edge really small for quite a while. On the other hand, you need a harder steel to support that edge... which makes it harder to sharpen (for many users).
On the other, other hand, like you said, some customers may benefit from a thicker BTE to stand up to use ... but then you have the appearance you mention, and also the blade will lose the feel of achieving a nice clean slice. Depends on the user i guess? Are you able to talk through with the customer the pros and cons of either approach?
example: i have a rather nice commercially made Nakiri, Hitachi white steel. I sharpen to 15 degrees per side, and it achieves a really nice edge. BUT, it always had a really bad (thick) bte measure, and so it has the appearance you mention, and also had the feel more of “chopping” through food than “slicing”. I am actually planning to regrind it to improve the bte ... and will shortly be starting a thread with photos looking for thoughts from the forum before i start up with the belt...