- Joined
- Jun 1, 2020
- Messages
- 158
That’s me.
I have nothing against flat grinds. The problem is every time Cold Steel converts a model from hollow to flat, the thickness behind the edge (TBE) goes way up. Recon 1’s for example with flat grind are 0.040” TBE. I don’t have a hollow ground recon 1, but the Code 4 tanto , which is hollow, is about 0.020”. I just bought an Espada large (the Al version). All the pictures show it hollow ground but it’s flat. TBE is horrible at 0.037-0.043”.
So what you say? If you measure cutting performance by the perceived force needed to make the cut, TBE is more important than sharpness, edge angle or handle comfort. Flat vs hollow, all else equal, doesn’t even show up.
If you don’t believe that, here’s an experiment you can do. Forget about cardboard cutting, rope cutting etc. They take too long and don’t bring out differences. Instead get a piece of Douglas fir 1x2. Carve chips off the end. Test your knives. Instantly you’ll see big differences in performance. Doug fir is hard and tough and you have to push hard. But the same differences occur with cardboard, it’s just harder to tell with the lower force.
BTW, my 6” Holdout is flat ground but it’s an amazing cutter at about 0.014” TBE. So flat ground doesn’t need to be stupid thick.
So why are new CS knives so high in TBE? I don’t know. Does anyone out there? I don’t even know any advantage to high TBE, except maybe hammering through nails, which is stupid. I suspect flat grind allows a cheaper, sloppier production process. Maybe belt vs wheel or something.
Maybe it’s just general dumbing down of knives. Spyderco popularized flat grinds so everyone wants flat grind. Well, change to flat if you want, but stop blowing out the TBE!
I always wanted a Tai Pan. But a review said they made the 3V’s flat. Forget it, I’m sick of knives that cut poorly. Can you imagine what a chisel it would be?
I have nothing against flat grinds. The problem is every time Cold Steel converts a model from hollow to flat, the thickness behind the edge (TBE) goes way up. Recon 1’s for example with flat grind are 0.040” TBE. I don’t have a hollow ground recon 1, but the Code 4 tanto , which is hollow, is about 0.020”. I just bought an Espada large (the Al version). All the pictures show it hollow ground but it’s flat. TBE is horrible at 0.037-0.043”.
So what you say? If you measure cutting performance by the perceived force needed to make the cut, TBE is more important than sharpness, edge angle or handle comfort. Flat vs hollow, all else equal, doesn’t even show up.
If you don’t believe that, here’s an experiment you can do. Forget about cardboard cutting, rope cutting etc. They take too long and don’t bring out differences. Instead get a piece of Douglas fir 1x2. Carve chips off the end. Test your knives. Instantly you’ll see big differences in performance. Doug fir is hard and tough and you have to push hard. But the same differences occur with cardboard, it’s just harder to tell with the lower force.
BTW, my 6” Holdout is flat ground but it’s an amazing cutter at about 0.014” TBE. So flat ground doesn’t need to be stupid thick.
So why are new CS knives so high in TBE? I don’t know. Does anyone out there? I don’t even know any advantage to high TBE, except maybe hammering through nails, which is stupid. I suspect flat grind allows a cheaper, sloppier production process. Maybe belt vs wheel or something.
Maybe it’s just general dumbing down of knives. Spyderco popularized flat grinds so everyone wants flat grind. Well, change to flat if you want, but stop blowing out the TBE!
I always wanted a Tai Pan. But a review said they made the 3V’s flat. Forget it, I’m sick of knives that cut poorly. Can you imagine what a chisel it would be?