Well, the fellow came this morning at 7AM sharp. He was very nice and upbeat. As I had told him, even a 50 foot setback wouldn't work unless we make the shop 6 feet wide. He quickly realized that.
We did some measurements and the closest place to the stream edge was 36 feet. The other end was 38 feet, and the center was 40 feet (stream bends). We looked at moving the shop up the lot, but even that wouldn't be 50 feet on both ends. We talked about options, and he said we will have to go to the zoning board and ask for a hardship variance. He will approve it (assuming the board will go along) if I agree to tear down all my existing accessory buildings and plant a buffer zone along the creek. He is going to talk with his boss today and see if they can offer any other options.
The only existing building I care about is the woodshop. I really didn't want to move that into the hot shop, but can build a second walled off section like the grinding room if necessary.
I discovered something that is really crazy while talking with him. When we were looking at moving the shopo up the lot closer to the house, I said that I would take out the big old pine that sits where the corner of the shop would be. He said, "Oh, No, you can't cut that tree down, it is protected." I asked why and he said all trees and shrubs within 100 feet of the stream are protected and I need a permit to remove them. I planted every tree, bush, and shrub on my entire 1.5 acre lots except the old pines, but according to the CBPA, I would need a permit to remove any of them. Not a big deal, but it just goes to show how crazy these rules are.
A final option is one I came up with while sitting on the deck yesterday. I haven't taken any exact measurements but I think I could attach it to the house on the end by the greenhouse. I would have to move the greenhouse door to the side, and would lose the dining room window, but it should fit from the corner to the deck just right. This would make it an addition, and not an accessory building. That would mean the setbacks, wetlands, and all the other crap would not apply (it would also probably be 50 feet from the creek). It would also solve the power and water issues. The biggest problem is it will have to be built to housing code, not a detached garage code. That would probably cost 50% to 100% more tan now budgeted. I will talk with my builder and see what he thinks about that idea, but let's hope we can build it out back as planned.