- Joined
- Mar 19, 2007
- Messages
- 7,437
I had a discussion with Paul Long a while back that has stuck in my head for some time, concerning the hand stitch and the machine stitch. His argument was, if I remember correctly, that the machine stitch, to the average consumer, was just as good, if not better than the hand stitch. Most people could not tell the difference and didn't value a hand stitched piece.
I said at the time that I understood his points and I wanted to take my hand stitch as far as it could go before judging it, fully.
At the time I was doing a straight saddle stitch. I started making smaller and thinner items and switched over to using stitching chisels and a European saddle stitch (I am calling it this - what I mean is a sort of zig zag stitch made with the awl places at roughly a 30 degree angle and the stitch going back and forth from one awl hole to another. I still see this stitch done a lot of items from the UK and this is why I gave it this name. In fact, Al Stohlman calls for this same stitch in his work "The Art of Hand Sewing".) I deeply enjoy this look and sought to bring this stitch as far as I could.
I am sure I have much more to learn, but when I completed the sheath seen below (for a small Sloyd knife) I thought I had pretty much taken this stitch to the extent that I am able.
So.... I am left wondering. Is Paul's argument still valid. Does the end consumer really know or care that my pieces are hand stitched in a traditional fashion? Are they willing to pay for my time (which is perhaps 10 times longer than it takes Paul to make the same stitch on his Cobra 4)?
I doubt it. But I wanted to open it up for discussion here.
What do you think? Does the average consumer care or are they willing to pay for a hand stitched sheath vs. a machine stitched sheath when there is such a time difference between the two?
Jason
I said at the time that I understood his points and I wanted to take my hand stitch as far as it could go before judging it, fully.
At the time I was doing a straight saddle stitch. I started making smaller and thinner items and switched over to using stitching chisels and a European saddle stitch (I am calling it this - what I mean is a sort of zig zag stitch made with the awl places at roughly a 30 degree angle and the stitch going back and forth from one awl hole to another. I still see this stitch done a lot of items from the UK and this is why I gave it this name. In fact, Al Stohlman calls for this same stitch in his work "The Art of Hand Sewing".) I deeply enjoy this look and sought to bring this stitch as far as I could.
I am sure I have much more to learn, but when I completed the sheath seen below (for a small Sloyd knife) I thought I had pretty much taken this stitch to the extent that I am able.
So.... I am left wondering. Is Paul's argument still valid. Does the end consumer really know or care that my pieces are hand stitched in a traditional fashion? Are they willing to pay for my time (which is perhaps 10 times longer than it takes Paul to make the same stitch on his Cobra 4)?
I doubt it. But I wanted to open it up for discussion here.




What do you think? Does the average consumer care or are they willing to pay for a hand stitched sheath vs. a machine stitched sheath when there is such a time difference between the two?
Jason