Hi. Again, I like your videos :thumbup:. You are surrounded by beautiful nature and wilderness its a pleasure to see. Also, the way you use your knives and play with them its very similar to mine; the ones you are showing are the kind of tasks I normally put my knives through, during our week-end hikes with my family

.
About these knives, I can only share a few feedbacks from my little personal experience. Please be aware I dont own these knives and didnt have the opportunity to use them so extensively as you did. I just played with them during one summer day, few years ago, in a friends house orchard, so rather barbeque testing stuff

. What can be interesting is I managed to use them together, so I am able to make some direct comparison. I think the two, the ER Dobermann IV and the FOX Combat Jungle, are comparable knives, in terms of size and intended use, in one way they can be seen as cousins, so to speak, the ER being a better performing product, in my opinion.
Fit and finish was good for both :thumbup:. I found the ER initially much sharper and the edge retention has been much better than the FOX. The ER surface coating (named testudo, a hot Black Oxide surface treatment) is very resistant; its completely another thing (and another performance level against wear and tear), when compared to the FOX (a Teflon coating) which immediately scratched just after some chopping. The ER looked to me having a slight forward balance which increased the efficiency in chopping and enhanced the blade penetration, good also on hardwoods (tested on some old vine branches). The FOX had a more neutral balance and the blade tended to get stuck in the wood when chopping. The ER handle, for as weird as it may look, was comfortable and much better than the FOX; it offered a better grip, no hot-spots and didnt twist and turn in the hand like the FOX. The jimping of the FOX also turned out to be rather annoying during prolonged use without gloves, it sticks out from the spine profile quite much and, for my taste, the knurls are not properly dimensioned and shaped to offer a good grip, rather ended up in being just a pain in the a$$. Batoning is not an ideal task for both since the swedges destroy the baton, no matter how hard the wood you use. They are both rather good in cutting and slicing, thanks to their flat grinds; its possible to get decent feather-sticks and kindling with relatively little efforts. Sheaths are both very good :thumbup:. One thing worth to note, from this short experience of mine, is it looks they both use the same steel, Bohler N690, but with totally different results! The ER keeps its edge long and its relatively easy to sharpen, the FOX lose its edge super fast and its very hard to sharpen back to decent levels (and this combination really sucks for a utility camp knife). Also I never fully understood the FOX naming: why calling it
combat jungle, when its clearly a utility knife? The writings engraved on the ER blade are tacky and ugly to my taste.
Overall, these are not my cup of tea

. Less and less, during the last years, I am using my own big camp knife (the Fallkniven A1). I just dont see the need any more for my type of hikes. I am fine with 10-12 cm blades (today I mainly use my folders or my F1 and my EKA Nordic 12 as fixed blades), the Felco 600 saw and my multitool or one of my SAKs. For my personal use and hiking style, the big camp knives, the choppers, are fun to play with but they have a limited efficiency and capability. You are showing yourself in your videos how difficult is to prepare food, carving wood, collecting wild edibles, etc. with such large blades. Just to chat

.