I had to finish tending to goats, then we ate supper.
I pressed it to cut 500 strands but it was not cutting well after 400. Which was a surprise to me. Some factors that may lend us
some clues toward it's performance: 1) could this blade be of 425M steel, (stamp / )2) it is twice as thin as a regular 110 blade and thin will cut better even when dull. 3) on this test I would cut then separate the strands and count them, keeping a running total. On the others the handfuls were counted and the number of strands estimated.
4) this blade was sharpened at 200 grit on a ACE Hardware stone, SiC material. The most coarsely sharpened blade used in this
cutting. 5) We've had over an inch of rain since the other tests. Could this have washed the sand & dust off the strands allowing better performance? Later examining the blade under the headset; 3" near the plunge line was rolled the rest had burrs.
You gents let me know what you think. I gave you the straight story, not skewing the numbers. DM