Upon unboxing, my initial impression of the Bushcraft Tasker was that it had a really long handle relative to its blade length. After some use, the longer handle feels like it provides increased control for fine or detailed work, probably not unlike the Carver.
Dimensions are:
OAL: 8 3/8"
Blade: 3 1/2"
Handle: 4 7/8"
Weight: 5.1 oz
The balance point is right on the second set of pins.
The Bushcraft Tasker's blade shape is quite different than that of a Bushcrafter. It's really closer to a Bush Hermit, but about half an inch shorter.
(One of these things is not like the others...)
All five of these knives are so close in overall length, this image looks very similar to the one above, but this one has the knives aligned at their butt.
In a departure from most similar Fiddleback knives, and certainly those in the above comparative images, the Bushcraft Tasker's handle is absent a finger groove immediately behind the guard. I noticed this most prominently in a hammer grip when choked up fully on the handle and with a paring-style grip. It seemed neither an advantage nor disadvantage in the former, just something that was noticeable when switching between the Tasker and another knife. It became less noticeable as I used the Tasker without switching back and forth between the other knives. For paring, though, the absent finger groove seemed to provide a bit of additional control.
The Bushcraft Tasker's curved handle reminds me of a Bushboot, although the BT's curve is more subtle. It provides options for hand placement that feel consistent along its length. Like most Fiddlebacks, no matter how you hold this knife, it's comfortable in the hand.
The Bushboot's shorter handle and more extreme curve serve to lock it into my hand. The Tasker provides a more "open" feel.
In actual use, I ended up comparing the BT to a Kephart in AEB-L, which, by the way, is awesome! This Kephart cuts into wood (and I'm sure other things) more like a 3/32" blade, maybe even better (at .118, it's closer to 1/8 than 3/32). I'm very interested to see how AEB-L holds up to hard, real-world use. A more appropriate head-to-head comparison may be to a Bushcrafter or Bush Hermit, but I really wanted to try out this Kephart.
While the Bushcraft Tasker and Kephart each felt very good in my hand, they both felt very different. The sides of the BT's handle are flatter; just behind the first set of pins, the BT is about one quarter inch larger in circumference and about one eighth of an inch taller than the Kephart. In my hand, the Kephart felt more natural. That's not to say the BT was uncomfortable or anything, in fact, both knives performed very well at notching, feathersticking, and everything else I tried with them. The Kephart did seem to make finer, smoother and more precise cuts, but I attribute that to differences between the steel.
I didn't baton with the Tasker; I prefer longer blades for that since I generally start with wide logs, but the 3 1/2" blade seems ideal for all other bushcraft tasks.