Nice to see more makers considering the actual impact of the secondary hardening hump on performance, other than just assuming either:
1. higher RC = better and/or
2. more carbide = better.
The secondary hardening bump really through me for a loop. I know several guys running their Z wear/PD1 at 62-63 and are happy with it but when I talked to the metallurgists they seemed pretty set that in a knife, secondary hardening is not what you want. I will be able to make a final judgement call after extensive testing but for now, at least theoretically, this steel should preform best before secondary hardening. The metallurgist at Zapp was very confident that at lest in smaller blades, Z wear would be better than 3V when run at the same hardness. 3V is likely still superior for bigger blades though due to its lower carbon content.
I'm mainly trying to bridge the gap between 3V and the M4 and up class for mid sized blades and get the perfect balance between toughness, strength, and wear resistance. As of now PD1/Zwear, and Vanadis 4E are looking extremely promising and based on reports from other makers I will likely be switching to one or the other as a replacement for 3V in mid sized knives.
In the near future I'm planning on sticking with
10V and M390 for slicing knives
Zwear/PD1 or V4E for mid sized knives/ knives that see harder use
3V for very large hard use knives
52100 for machetes and big choppers and L6 or 80CRV2 for axes
I'm also going to toy with some S7 machetes this summer....