Glock 81 Knife Review

Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Messages
2,373
Glock Knife Review

This past week I was able to spend 4 days/3 nights out in the wilderness teaching my 11 year-old daughter survival skills. I had given her an OD handled Glock 81 knife with the saw teeth on the back of the blade to use as her “survival knife”. Over the course of our stay we used this knife almost exclusively for all tasks to get a better idea of its capabilities.

Small Game: The Glock 81 was used to kill four live quail we had brought with us to give Pictlet experience in handling game. (hunting is illegal in Brazil). Pictlet did the deed and then used the knife to breast out the bird, separate the legs, and clean the gizzards. The Glock knife did very well. It was shaving sharp when we started and this was the first task we put it to. We did not find it too large to work with these small birds.

Food Preparation: The Glock knife was used to open green coconuts, peel sugarcane, and slice palm cabbage (for quail stew).

Chopping at the coconuts was a waste of time but slicing thin layers across the top was very effective. The narrow blade was especially good at cutting a hole in the top to extract the water inside. FYI the water in green coconuts is under pressure and will spray a good 5 to 10 feet if you aim it just right at someone.

Peeling sugarcane was hindered a little by the steep edge geometry. The saw teeth on the back were useful in cutting a notch to snap the cane into bite-sized portions. However, the teeth clog very quickly and cut less than a centimeter before needing to be cleaned out. They are not aggressive enough to function well on wood.

Palm cabbage (Palmito, or Palm Heart) is very wimpy stuff to cut and the Glock Knife made short work of it.

Chopping & Shaping Hardwood: We had the opportunity to make a pair of fire-hardened spears out of a 4 cm diameter sapling. We used the Glock 81 to chop it down, strip the bark and branches and shape the points for burning. The Glock knife is disappointing as a chopper. We got the tree down but the knife lacks weight at the tip and its edge geometry does not allow it to penetrate well. If I held the knife with two fingers at the base of the handle it did a fair job. As a comparison I did some chopping with my Air Force Survival knife and estimated it as twice as effective. (I had re-profiled the edge of this knife to about 20 degrees). Stripping bark and branches was easy with the Glock knife but the edge geometry was a drawback here as well.

Edge retention: The Glock Knife takes and edge very quickly and looses it if you start cutting wood. It is easy to sharpen in the field but we did not sharpen it to get a better idea of how much useful life the blade had in it. The portion of blade used for chopping is dull but the rest is sharp enough for general use. Touching it up with an EZ-lap would bring it back to life.

Other Handling Characteristics: The Glock 81 is a very lightweight knife compared to a Ka-Bar or Air Force Survival knife. The polymer scabbard is excellent. On several occasions I noticed my daughter listening for the audible “Snap” the knife makes when the clip secures it. She would then give the knife a tug to make sure it was held fast. I had NOT told her to do that. I figure if an 11 year-old blond can figure that out it is a very good feature on a kid’s survival knife!

Conclusions: The Glock 81 Knife can be made to work in a survival situation. It’s light- weight and positive retention are a definite plus. The steep, almost blunt, edge geometry was an irritation for many tasks. Re-profiling the edge to a sharper angle will greatly enhance performance. The edge discolors quickly and would need to be re-sharpened every two days to maintain effectiveness. The saw teeth on the back don’t enhance it’s usefulness and are unnecessary in the wilderness.

While I wouldn’t rate it “Best of the Breed” like their handguns, the Glock 81 is a passable survival knife. Mac
 
I agree.I had to greatly reprofile the edge on mine to get it to cut worth a darn.It was really disappointing considering how good their handguns are.
 
it's my opinion that the Glock field knives are not good survival knives... serviceable, yes... good, no...

There are so many other knives that would do so much better.

The Glock field knives were made to be bayonet type fighters... no slashing, just stabbing, by hand or on the end of a rifle... the small surface area minimizes lateral forces when used as a bayonet (stuck bayonets- rifles are often rocked back and forth to loosen a stuck bayonet).

I got mine when they first came out about a decade ago, and the only thing it did well was open bottles, and the best thing it ever did was fetch me two cartons of Menthol GPC's in a trade, while we were on an FTX.
 
Wow, excellent review! I've always wanted to pick up one of the Glock field knives. Sounds like you and your daughter will have some great wilderness adventures!
 
I took about 40 minutes this morning to re-profile the Glock knife to a 20 degree angle. I used a Lansky and a coarse stone for the bulk of it and finished with a fine stone and then a hard Arkansas. The new Glock 81 is a vast improvement over the way it was shipped and should enhance performance to a degree.

True, there are better knives out there if you are in the market for only one knife. True, if you have a selection of knives at home you could probably manage to pick a better one for a survival knife.

I picked this knife up for $24 and later decided it would work real good as my daughters first "real" knife. As it is now I wouldn't have any problem using it as a survival knife, especially here. I always carry a machete anyway, no mere knife is up to the task of clearing trail here.

We used the Glock knife for every task we needed to and it performed the tasks. Now that the blade is sharper I have no second thoughts for the use we are putting it to. Mac
 
I think the model(Glock 78) without the sawteeth would make a better general use knife.
 
Back
Top