H&K knives? Good quality?

Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
338
I just got in H&Ks new knife catalog for 2015, and i REALLY like the look of the nitrous blitz, does anyone have any comments or experiences with this blade? and if so how was the overall experience, because the nitrous blitz looks like a good size for my edc.
 
Most HK knives are made here in the US by Benchmade. If the knife is American production, you should have a great knife. It is my understanding that HK knives do not have the MAP pricing restrictions that Benchmade enforces on their other lines.

If it is a model made outside the USA, it can be hit or miss. I have seen a few foreign models and have not been real impressed.

Hope this info is of help to you.
 
I only have one H&K knife - 14715. It's a well made knife. That particular one is US-made (D2 blade, Axis lock, G10 handles). There's a mini version (14716) that looks pretty appealing too.
 
Most HK knives are made here in the US by Benchmade. If the knife is American production, you should have a great knife. It is my understanding that HK knives do not have the MAP pricing restrictions that Benchmade enforces on their other lines.

If it is a model made outside the USA, it can be hit or miss. I have seen a few foreign models and have not been real impressed.

Hope this info is of help to you.

the nitrous blitz is one of their knives that are made in the us! so it should be decent quality then. :) and i think i might pull the trigger on it because of all the good things I've heard about it.
 
I like H&K knives. They have the benchmade quality but I feel they do them a bit toned down with the focus on utility rather than aesthetics. Nothing wrong with them by any means. I especially like their epidemic OTF. Many models are actually based on previous models like lonewolf dual action side openers and a model similar to a rukus.
 
I owned an HK nitrous blitz. One of the worst knives I've owned. I'm serious. It was worth nowhere near 100 bucks. I guess maybe it'd be worth 50 bucks or whatever based on the Ti liners and whatnot but I'd rather have a $20 Kershaw. Seriously. If you want a light knife, get a spyderco. If you want an expensive robust knife, get a ZT. If you want a cheap, kind of robust knife get a Kershaw. For God's sake, don't get the nitrous blitz. I lost it and it's, literally, the only knife I didn't care about losing. I received a free buck POS from work and I'd rather have that. I tried to give it to my wife and she didn't want it. I bought her a mini grip which she was alright with until she saw and held the below mentioned ZT 0566BW which she claimed as hers as soon as she held it.

The knife scales could be pushed together with one hand when the blade was deployed. The assisted opening method, I forgot what they call it, was weak and slow, and the edge literally crumbled in use. There were so many problems with it that I know it wasn't a dud. It was just a crap knife. That knife, more than any other, is what put a terrible taste in my mouth for Benchmade. They should've been ashamed for that piece of crap for 100 bucks. I bought a ZT0566BW for 115 bucks and it was, literally, at least 3 times the knife for a couple bucks more. I don't even talk about that knife very often because it's not worth it. If benchmade was cool with that knife going put at all, ever, the way they designed it, then it's not worth even discussing. People think I hate ZT but that's not true, they're good enough to talk about.

Would I take a free one if given to me? Sure. And I'd turn right around and give it to a homeless guy so that maybe he could sell it to buy some booze.

On the plus side it was light and looked cool and carried like it wasn't even there. If you wear light pants like khakis or a suit, then maybe the blitz would be alright because of how light it is. Other than that, it's kind if worthless. Don't say you weren't warned.
 
Last edited:
You know, I have to somewhat retract that statement. That knife was my first foray into knives that cost some kind of significant money. I was so disappointed in that knife that I started reading up on why steels perform the way they do and what makes a folding knife sturdy. So in that regard it pushed me into buying good knives instead of cheap crap. For that I'm thankful for getting that piece of crap.
 
In some ways I feel the HK Tumult's design is superior to the current production Ultratechs as far as comfort in carry and ease of use is concerned. Blackout hardware & clip, no glassbreaker, non proprietary hardware and clip, better traction, and more comfortable/easy to use firing switch.

I did feel that the QC may not have been as consistent as that of the Ultratech, however, as 3 of the 4 of them I tried at my then-local knife shop had uneven grinds, spring "sing", excessive play on the button, and gritty firing and retracting.

Being that they are the same price I would usually choose the Ultratech as the knife with more 'value' because of the possibly better QC, Elmax steel (vs. D2) and more blade finish/coloration choices, but if money were no object I would definitely buy an HK Tumult due to the more user friendly design.
 
I have one, got it for a good price at a pawn shop that didn't know what they had. I haven't had any notable problems with it. The steel is 154cm and performed just like any other benchmade I've had. I will say the assisted opening is kinda of weird, and not the fastest or hardest hitting opener I've had. But it's not a bad knife.
 
I can only speak of the older H&K knives especially the 14205 and it was a fantastic knife!
 
You know, I have to somewhat retract that statement. That knife was my first foray into knives that cost some kind of significant money. I was so disappointed in that knife that I started reading up on why steels perform the way they do and what makes a folding knife sturdy. So in that regard it pushed me into buying good knives instead of cheap crap. For that I'm thankful for getting that piece of crap.


I had the same expirence with a S.O.G. That's why I started researching and learning about knives.
 
I just got in H&Ks new knife catalog for 2015, and i REALLY like the look of the nitrous blitz, does anyone have any comments or experiences with this blade? and if so how was the overall experience, because the nitrous blitz looks like a good size for my edc.


I got that same catalog in the mail yesterday! I actually came here to look up H&K.
 
I owned an HK nitrous blitz. One of the worst knives I've owned. I'm serious. It was worth nowhere near 100 bucks. I guess maybe it'd be worth 50 bucks or whatever based on the Ti liners and whatnot but I'd rather have a $20 Kershaw. Seriously. If you want a light knife, get a spyderco. If you want an expensive robust knife, get a ZT. If you want a cheap, kind of robust knife get a Kershaw. For God's sake, don't get the nitrous blitz. I lost it and it's, literally, the only knife I didn't care about losing. I received a free buck POS from work and I'd rather have that. I tried to give it to my wife and she didn't want it. I bought her a mini grip which she was alright with until she saw and held the below mentioned ZT 0566BW which she claimed as hers as soon as she held it.

The knife scales could be pushed together with one hand when the blade was deployed. The assisted opening method, I forgot what they call it, was weak and slow, and the edge literally crumbled in use. There were so many problems with it that I know it wasn't a dud. It was just a crap knife. That knife, more than any other, is what put a terrible taste in my mouth for Benchmade. They should've been ashamed for that piece of crap for 100 bucks. I bought a ZT0566BW for 115 bucks and it was, literally, at least 3 times the knife for a couple bucks more. I don't even talk about that knife very often because it's not worth it. If benchmade was cool with that knife going put at all, ever, the way they designed it, then it's not worth even discussing. People think I hate ZT but that's not true, they're good enough to talk about.

Would I take a free one if given to me? Sure. And I'd turn right around and give it to a homeless guy so that maybe he could sell it to buy some booze.

On the plus side it was light and looked cool and carried like it wasn't even there. If you wear light pants like khakis or a suit, then maybe the blitz would be alright because of how light it is. Other than that, it's kind if worthless. Don't say you weren't warned.

are you sure you just didn't get a dud? all the other reviews I've seen/heard on youtube have all been very positive. i have looked into that ZT 0566BW before and it looked awesome, but the weight turned me off, because 5.30 ounces is just a lil too much for me.
 
For a couple bucks more the 14715 is the best buy in the entire HK lineup, if not the entire current Benchmade catalogue.
 
My HK 14250 from 2005 is still an excellent folder. It's a tank that just keeps on going.

I've been surprised at the fairly good quality of my HK 14715 and 14716.

All of the aforementioned were/are made in the U.S.
 
are you sure you just didn't get a dud? all the other reviews I've seen/heard on youtube have all been very positive. i have looked into that ZT 0566BW before and it looked awesome, but the weight turned me off, because 5.30 ounces is just a lil too much for me.

Yeah. It's hard for a whole knife to be a dud. If it was one problem or another, then it would be a dud and worth sending in for repair, like if it was just the blade being poorly heat treated or just slow to open. The fact that several aspects were less than good left me with the conclusion that it was just a poorly designed knife, at least relative to what I consider good. I didn't want to get hugely into it because I don't want to sound like I'm bashing BM, I've used a mini-grip that was just fine and one from their bone collector series. They didn't really suit me but they were fine as far as purchase price and functionality.

As far as the nitrous blitz, their nitrous assisted opening mechanism, basically a leaf spring type set up, was slow, inefficient, and really ineffective. Once the detent was overcome any kind of pressure at all against the blade would halt movement. Using the thumbstuds it was hard to flick it open without my thumb coming off of the stud and brushing the blade as it opened. I could wrist flick it open just fine but that negates the purpose of the assisted opening mechanism.

Like is said, the steel was less than good, far less. I don't need to go into a steel being shoddy. It was probably a dud blade because the 154cm I used on the mini-grip was good and I can't see BM heat treating the blades much differently between the different series.

I really don't know what they use to coat the blade and pocket clip, but it might as well be black paint. It came off ridiculously easy making the knife looked far more used than it actually was. Within a month it looked like I'd been carrying and using the knife for quite a bit longer than that.

The handles had G10 scales and Ti liners, of course. The G10 was slick, a little bit of sweat or other moisture caused it to be slippery. The Ti, which is really the second reason I bought the knife, the first being I thought it looked cool as hell, were so thin that I could squeeze the two sides of the handle together, almost where they were touching. If the blade was closed, I could squeeze the handles and pinch the blade hard enough to where the blade could not be deployed.

The lock stuck pretty bad. I could release it with my thumb alone but it wasn't smooth by any means. I've seen and heard of worse now but I knew enough then to know I didn't like it.

There were easily felt hot spots on the top of the handle, both where you'd place your thumb and farther back near the ring finger. It wasn't because the edges weren't knocked off, they were smooth enough, but it was just a bad design for my hand. I wear large gloves, not small midget hands or large Andre the giant bone crushers. If they'd have put a back spacer in there it would've solved a couple of the problems, like the hot spots and the side of the handles being so flimsy.

It was hard to find a sweet spot that allowed the weak opening spring to work while keeping the blade from rubbing the sides and introducing blade play. I blame that on the weak spring but really I could just as easily blame it on the blade being off center.

On the plus side, like I said it was super light, carried well in the pocket, and the blade grind on both primary and secondary bevels were well done. The swedge terminated evenly on both sides leaving the spine looking good. It was easy to disassemble and re-assemble. It was easy to remove the knife from the pocket and replace it because of the slick G10. It had a standard BM arrow shape clip which is alright. Didn't get caught on anything and I'm sure BM would've sent a replacement if it had broken.

Anyway, I didn't mean to lay it all out there but for $100 bucks it could've and should have met my expectations a little more. I didn't expect perfection, I rarely do, but I want a company to sell me a product that's worth their asking price. There were too many flaws in this knife model that can't be explained by something that could be a one time thing, like a botched heat treat.

Good luck, if you get a coated blade you'll destroy it's value pretty quickly and it'll be hard to recoup even close to what you paid for it if you decide to sell it. I couldn't really bring myself to gift it to anyone else so I put it in one of my junk drawers. Went back looking for it later and it wasn't there. It's just as well. I didn't care about it one way or another. Maybe some of the other knives in their HK lineup are good. I don't know and will probably never know. Good luck with your decision. It is a pretty cool looking knife.
 
Some of the HK series are standouts and well worth having.

My HK Snody design 425 Gravitator and 426 Hybrid / Tactical are exceptional knives. Great quality and f&f on all levels. Consider myself lucky to have them.

The new HK 14715 is another great knife for the price. At it's price point one of the best values in this years line up. AXIS lock with good materials, a solid work horse of a knife. Considering getting a second one but the Tanto version.

On the budget side the HK Ascender (now discontinued) but can still be found is hands down the best "budget" knife I've ever owned period!. Good blade size, sound solid lock up, smooth opening and great ergo's, For me anyway. The 9CR14MOV steel really surprised me. They must have really nailed the HT on this one as it noticeably outperforms other alphabet steels I own / owned from other brands. Takes and holds a great edge. The one below I've had for several years now and you'd never believe how much use it's seen from the looks of it. It's my dedicated around the house box opener / cardboard shredder. I'm also amazed at how well the blade coating has held up too.

The Monochrome is another great little knife for the price. Very solid, good steel and takes what you throw at it. I've had several, both original Red Class and the HK version in 440C. For the price a good value.

Overall I see a lot of good knives in the HK line up. Not all but there are some gems in there for sure. Many that were BM Red Class knives that were converted over to the HK line. Obviously haven't tried them all and not all of them appeal to me but of the ones I have, so far have been good to great and I haven't been disappointed yet.

All the best!
suMD1Jc.jpg

8z3xEsm.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top