Btw, welcome to the forums!
I'd pass on the SOG Bowie and AUS 8. At the price point of $190 (I almost swallowed my gum in surprise), I'd expect much better steel. I'd take the Pillar over the Bowie in a heartbeat. I also like a 4-6" blade in a camping/hiking knife. The 5" Pillar is just about ideal for me. The Bowie is a little big imho.
If you are willing spend $190 or so, I'll throw out some suggestions and even some less expensive options.
If you don't mind FRN and the color (I don't), a Buck and S35VN is hard to beat. You save $ with the lesser handle and sheath material. Buck warranty is

too.
https://www.bladehq.com/item--Buck-Pursuit-Pro-Large-Fixed-Blade--115698
Tad shorter than the Pillar with same steel. ESEE has one of the best warranties in the business. Handle *might* be a little on the short side if you have a very large hand like I do (I wear a 2xl glove).
https://www.bladehq.com/item--ESEE-Knives-ESEE-4-Fixed-Blade--118460
Btw, the one 1095 blade I own is an ESEE 5. Nice but the .25 stock is a little too thick imo.
Niolox steel. Almost 13% Cr so almost stainless. My buddy had one, very nice and almost the perfect size and shape imo.
https://www.bladehq.com/item--LionSteel-T5-Fixed-Blade-Knife--111852
I looked up some reviews on the Pillar. It looks like a solid knife too. The only thing that might be a question mark for me is the heat treatment. The steel is part of the equation but the heat treatment on that steel makes a difference too. I don't know enough about SOG and their heat treatment. I have more experience with Buck, ESEE, and Lionsteel.