I love 3V. I never had issues with it. Stood up well even after hitting a bone. My personal experience with it is top notch. No complains from me.
And then I heard a guy complain about 3V Benchmade Leuku chipping upon probably hitting a pebble while he was chopping something in forest and he hit the dirt with a knife.
I head to Facebook - bit of digging and there's video of dude throwing Cold Steel Master Hunter into wooden chair, prying sideways to pull it out and - the tip snapping. That is very idiotic thing to do, but 3V is super hyped, and well...
Second video is guy using a hammer (metal hammer) to baton Cold Steel 3V SRK (also idiotic thing to do) and it broke within few hits.
I watched JoeX videos with several 3V knives from Cold Steel, Bark River, Bradford Guardian - and none of them were super impressive. In matter of fact, every single one of them has left me disappointed. Multiple knives in 1095, AUS8 and other "cheap steels" outperformed the 3V in way that not only they took more abuse, but they even had better edge stability upon impacting metal and brick.
Overall grind thicknesses, geometry and hardness are varying from these knives, but we keep coming back to the fact that knives in 3V might not be so ultra tough we imagined them to be. Which brings question of all these charts posting 3V up to the very top of tough steels when real world abuse tests show different data?
I know everything will fail given enough abuse, just 3V seems to be regularly failing from way less abuse than 1095.
3V is a way better steel in a way that it'll rust less and keep it's edge for longer than 1095 for example, but is it really that "super" as internet makes it to be? Every time when someone asks for reccomendation for tough knife - 3V is brought up. But real world abuse tests show different story.
What are your takes on it?
And then I heard a guy complain about 3V Benchmade Leuku chipping upon probably hitting a pebble while he was chopping something in forest and he hit the dirt with a knife.
I head to Facebook - bit of digging and there's video of dude throwing Cold Steel Master Hunter into wooden chair, prying sideways to pull it out and - the tip snapping. That is very idiotic thing to do, but 3V is super hyped, and well...
Second video is guy using a hammer (metal hammer) to baton Cold Steel 3V SRK (also idiotic thing to do) and it broke within few hits.
I watched JoeX videos with several 3V knives from Cold Steel, Bark River, Bradford Guardian - and none of them were super impressive. In matter of fact, every single one of them has left me disappointed. Multiple knives in 1095, AUS8 and other "cheap steels" outperformed the 3V in way that not only they took more abuse, but they even had better edge stability upon impacting metal and brick.
Overall grind thicknesses, geometry and hardness are varying from these knives, but we keep coming back to the fact that knives in 3V might not be so ultra tough we imagined them to be. Which brings question of all these charts posting 3V up to the very top of tough steels when real world abuse tests show different data?
I know everything will fail given enough abuse, just 3V seems to be regularly failing from way less abuse than 1095.
3V is a way better steel in a way that it'll rust less and keep it's edge for longer than 1095 for example, but is it really that "super" as internet makes it to be? Every time when someone asks for reccomendation for tough knife - 3V is brought up. But real world abuse tests show different story.
What are your takes on it?