As some here probably know, I am a huge fan of the Spitfire. For me, it is the perfect size. It feels great in my hand. It's thin and very light. I have forgotten it's in my pocket on more than one occasion. I like the blade shape. I love how easy it is for me to open one handed. I can easily flick it open and closed. However, lately I've been feeling a bit jaded about the Spitfire. I have two Spitfires - a standard orange one and a black one with S35VN steel. I'll get to why I'm feeling jaded in a bit, but first here's the differences between the two Spitfires.
Orange Spitfire:
Black Spitfire:
Not too long ago a family member got a Vantage Pro. I got to check it out. It felt pretty good to hold, although I think I still prefer the Spitfire. The action was smooth, and it locked up solid. There was no blade play whatsoever. I like the thumb hole on the Spitfire a lot more than with the Vantage Pro. It was also extremely sharp out of the box. After checking out that Vantage Pro, it left me feeling a bit jaded about the Spitfire. I prefer the ergonomics of the Spitfire, but it just makes me wonder how two knives of the same type can be as different as they are. I like the better steels of S30V and S35VN over the standard 420HC. That's why I still find myself using the black Spitfire more. Being black with a stonewashed finish just looks cool, too.
I don't want it to sound like I'm being nitpicky. I really didn't intend to. After owning the two Spitfires for awhile, these are just the things that I have noticed between the two. I think the Spitfire is so close to being perfect. Buck just needs to get some of the gremlins worked out.
Orange Spitfire:
- The date on the box says 3-7-16
- Smooth action
- Tight lockup
- Virtually no blade play
- Smooth edges on the handle and jimping
Black Spitfire:
- The date on the box says 10-31-16
- Gritty-ish action
- Tight lockup
- Some vertical blade play. It's nothing major, but it's enough for me to notice it. It's become a minor annoyance. I find myself fidgeting with the blade moving it up and down while it is locked open.
It was especially noticeable when I was cutting some zip ties. The orange one did not produce this feeling when I cut zip ties with it.
- The edges and jimping on the handle feel a bit more aggressive than on the orange Spitfire. It's not uncomfortable by any means, but it's noticeable.
- When locked open, the lockbar sticks farther above the handle than with the orange Spitfire. On the orange one, the lockbar is pretty much flush with the handle when the blade is locked open. The lockbar is easier to push down on the black one, too.
- The main pivot screw moves up and down ever so slightly when the blade is locked open, and I move the blade up and down. The orange one does not do that.
- The same pivot screw, and the insert it's screwed into, can be rotated slightly by just pushing it. The orange one does not do that.
Not too long ago a family member got a Vantage Pro. I got to check it out. It felt pretty good to hold, although I think I still prefer the Spitfire. The action was smooth, and it locked up solid. There was no blade play whatsoever. I like the thumb hole on the Spitfire a lot more than with the Vantage Pro. It was also extremely sharp out of the box. After checking out that Vantage Pro, it left me feeling a bit jaded about the Spitfire. I prefer the ergonomics of the Spitfire, but it just makes me wonder how two knives of the same type can be as different as they are. I like the better steels of S30V and S35VN over the standard 420HC. That's why I still find myself using the black Spitfire more. Being black with a stonewashed finish just looks cool, too.

I don't want it to sound like I'm being nitpicky. I really didn't intend to. After owning the two Spitfires for awhile, these are just the things that I have noticed between the two. I think the Spitfire is so close to being perfect. Buck just needs to get some of the gremlins worked out.