- Joined
- Dec 1, 2019
- Messages
- 63
I want to buy a lionsteel very badly but Ive heard a lot of bad things about their m390 being so soft that I might as well get s30v instead. Thought I would ask here before buying.
-
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details: https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Is lionsteel’s m390 still considered soft?
- Thread starter knife_bro69
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2019
- Messages
- 63
Is 59 low for m390?
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2017
- Messages
- 108
To answer the question in the topic: It shouldn't. The whole "Lionsteel's M390 is too soft" debate started with a youtube video from Luvthemknives. LTK stated that a Collector's knives sheep foot made by Lionsteel only had a 51 HRC hardness despite being advertised as 58-60 HRC. In the end it turned out that it was indeed 59.1 HRC and LTK deleted his video. In his follow up video (also deleted) LTK admitted that not a single knife was out of specification.
I recommend reading the original thread here on blade forums and Collectorknives' comment under this Nick Shabazz video:
My personal opinion: The whole thing really went out of proportion and some people that do not like Lionsteel for winning too many blade awards saw it as an opportunity to post bs.
To sum things up: Lionsteel knives usually have the hardness that is advertised. Is 58-60 HRC too soft? That is open to debate. Several European knife companies regard it as the optimal range for an edc or outdoor knife. However, there are also people like their M390 hardened to 62 HRC - that's what Spyderco did with some Para 2 exclusives (AFAIK the Para 3 M390 exclusive was also tested at 59 HRC though).
I have owned at least 30 knives with M390 blades and I think Lionsteel usually does a pretty good job hardening the blade to the sweet spot where it keeps a good edge while not becoming brittle or even prone to clipping.
I recommend reading the original thread here on blade forums and Collectorknives' comment under this Nick Shabazz video:
My personal opinion: The whole thing really went out of proportion and some people that do not like Lionsteel for winning too many blade awards saw it as an opportunity to post bs.
To sum things up: Lionsteel knives usually have the hardness that is advertised. Is 58-60 HRC too soft? That is open to debate. Several European knife companies regard it as the optimal range for an edc or outdoor knife. However, there are also people like their M390 hardened to 62 HRC - that's what Spyderco did with some Para 2 exclusives (AFAIK the Para 3 M390 exclusive was also tested at 59 HRC though).
I have owned at least 30 knives with M390 blades and I think Lionsteel usually does a pretty good job hardening the blade to the sweet spot where it keeps a good edge while not becoming brittle or even prone to clipping.
It's happening to me now...just added a TRE Ti next to the orange SR11.
I’ve no idea of the specific hardness of Lionsteel m390 Blades, but all mine show typical attributes of this type of steel. I.e hardly ever need sharpening, just the occasional strop.
So I have no issues with the steel whatsoever.
P.s yes the are addictive knives
So I have no issues with the steel whatsoever.
P.s yes the are addictive knives
Not for my budget. So the two I have now are very precious to me...Only problem with Lionsteel is they're too affordable and hence you may end up with too many when you start buying them