I got a good opportunity to take the blades down to the tree patch.
At the gathering I had a chance to whack on some downed oak, so I had a good idea of what to expect with regards to the blades' performance.
I decided to use my Becker Machax as a comparison to the Beast and Kukri.
I took down about 6 trees a piece for each of the blades, ranging from 1 inch diameter up to maybe 4 inch diameter.
Just for my sanity, I only took photos of one tree per blade.
I tried to pick out three evenly sized trees to document the experience.
Kukri
Machax
Beast
Next I wanted to show the penetration of each knife in similar test media (soft maple).
The Kukri did pretty well considering the thickness of the grind.
I have cut down dozens of these soft maples with my Machax, so I knew what to expect. A couple years ago, I filed it down to thin it out and make it faster. It definitely improved the choppiness. So if you have a stock Machax, my results are not necessarily comparable to what to expect with an unmodified one.
I had to take a couple chops to get the Beast to stay put for a photo.
The Kukri took the longest to chop through the soft maple. This was the first tree of the three I took down, so perhaps that had something do with it. My arm was a little sore afterwards. Let's face it, the Kukri is a huge piece of K-Treet.
I should note that I did not time this or do an exact count of chops needed.
Next was my Machax. After using the Kukri, this felt like I was swinging a filet knife. Huge difference in weight, and I must say the Machax felt somewhat flimsy.
It bit a little deeper than the Kukri and was quicker to handle, however as it is ground somewhat thin, it did bind up in the wood, which definitely slowed it down.
Next was The Beast, and I must say that this one is aptly named. Bit deep and didn't bind in the wood like the machax. It chopped down the tree the quickest and was a pure pleasure to use.
One thing that is apparent as soon as one takes hold of these knives is the difference in grip. Both in size and shape. Each has their benefits.
The Kukri handle is much thinner than the Beast.
I found it very comfortable, but in course of chopping, I did notice my hand had a tendency to slip back to the butt of the handle. This was fine as swinging it like that allowed for more forward weight, and therefore slightly better chopping.
The Beast had thicker, shorter handle that was also very comfortable. Having the finger notch at the front of the handle really helps to lock the hand in place.
After having the chance to put these blades through their paces, I was definitely more impressed with the Beast, as far as chopping ability goes. For my uses, the Kukri would truly benefit from a full height grind to increase chopping ability. As John mentioned at the gathering, traditional Kukris are made to be strictly weapons, and in the reverse grip, Danny's Kukri has an obvious advantage over the Beast, with the added quality of being a fully capable chopper.
One of the holes in my JK collection will certainly be filled with one or both of these knives sooner or later.
Thanks again to Danny and Russ for offering up their knives for us to check out. It is always great to get the chance to check out a knife (or two)that one would not usually get the chance to see.