K390 Toughness Data or Comparisons? (Any Charpy Info?)

Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
314
K390 is a pretty sweet steel on paper, and I am very excited to be getting the chance to test it in an incoming Mule Team knife. From what I've read on the forum, it's a modified version of A11 (k294/10V), designed to improve toughness while maintaining nearly the same wear resistance. What I am wondering is just how "improved" the impact resistance is vs. steels like 10V (it's parent alloy), CPM-M4 (famous for it's balance of toughness and great edge retention, and my favorite user steel), and s90v (the next step down as far as I can see in edge retention).

The Bucorp lit (here in .pdf) shows the impact resistance of 10V to be about 75% that of K390 at 61HRc, with ~44J or 34.45 ft/lb of force used for the K390. I can't really compare this directly, since I'm not sure that Charpy standards were used, but using other sources to place the toughness of 10V @60HRc at ~20 ft/lbs, this data seems a bit optimistic for Charpy numbers. These results would mean M4-class toughness with s110v/10v class wear resistance. My money is on a slightly lower Charpy result of around ~25ft/lbs. at this hardness, placing K390 close to M390 as far as impact resistance goes.

Of course, this is all conjecture with a dash of slipshod detective work. This data is also for a hardness (61HRc) that is quite a bit lower than the usual target hardness of 10V ad K390, which is around 63-64HRc. Does anyone have any concrete data on K390's impact resistance (toughness)? Charpy c-notch results would be grand.
 
Last edited:
Bump this decade old question because I'm curious too (I'm sure the OP has figured it out by now).

If calculating from 10V, Larrin plots 10V at 7-8 ft lbs (unknown test) across 61-65 Rc. If that's 75%, then K390 would calc to 9-11 ft lbs by that same test.

Anybody have better data?
 
Larrin Larrin wrote about it - in his article here https://knifesteelnerds.com/2021/10...ness-edge-retention-and-corrosion-resistance/

but here is the graph - m390 toughness is junk, as one should expect from steel with 2.5% carbon lol it's just too much imho, I won't touch it personally
stainless-toughness-10-19-21.jpg
 
sorry, the m390 got me confused --- thought I was looking at k390

funny how no 3rd party has done any direct testing... but bohler has this published: https://www.bohler-edelstahl.com/en/products/k390-microclean/

k390_diagramm2-768x380.jpg


Specimens taken from rolled steel bar in longitudinal direction, centre
Source material dimensions: 40.8 mm round
Specimen size: 7 x 10 x 55 mm per SEP 1314
 
Last edited:
Yes Bohler has claimed that K390 has superior toughness to 10V but I haven’t seen independent testing to confirm or deny that. The K390 I used for CATRA testing was too thin for my standard toughness test. If someone can get me some 1/8” stock I can test it.
 
Thanks for the info everyone. After reviewing the info, an educated guess would probably put K390 somewhere between Vanadis 8 and S110V, maybe somewhere around ~10 ft-lbs (dependent on heat treat)?
 
Thanks for the info everyone. After reviewing the info, an educated guess would probably put K390 somewhere between Vanadis 8 and S110V, maybe somewhere around ~10 ft-lbs (dependent on heat treat)?
Between Vanadis 8 and 10V, yes.
 
Between Vanadis 8 and 10V, yes.
Thanks Dr. Thomas. Really enjoy all the data, history, and general info on your site. So much so that I ordered your book.

Kind of a side note, is your data available for download, for personal use? Basically I'm thinking it'd be great to have a spreadsheet with the actual numbers for each specific steel.

Regards.
 
Thanks Dr. Thomas. Really enjoy all the data, history, and general info on your site. So much so that I ordered your book.

Kind of a side note, is your data available for download, for personal use? Basically I'm thinking it'd be great to have a spreadsheet with the actual numbers for each specific steel.

Regards.
I’ve toyed with the idea of an interactive spreadsheet but I’ve never gotten around to actually doing it.
 
Back
Top