Folks, let me start by saying that I'm a big fan of Made in the USA.
I bought a Kershaw Compound 1940ST (made in China) recently for under $20 and have been thrilled with the knife and amazed at the quality. I liked it so much, I decided up upgrade the following week by buying the similar but US made Kershaw Turbulence 1790 which I received tonight.
There are many positive qualities about both knives, but since this is a complaint, I'll ignore the positive bits.
I was a little disappointed to find that the finish on the US Made Turbulence was not as good as the similar Chinese model.
Most visibly, the edge of the liner has tool marks it looks like there was an attempt made to buff these marks out, but it still doesn't compare to the quality in the 1940ST.
The thumb studs are non-functional for opening the knife and appear to act as rotation stops in the open and closed position.
The liner lock is almost even height with the edge of the handle and has rounded corners. This prevents me from unlocking the knife using the flesh of my thumb - I have to use my thumb nail.
The opening action is also not as smooth as the Compound 1940. If I slowly depress the flipper, it will not open into the fully locked position.
Kershaw - if you're listening, here are a few observations / feedback after playing with both knives:
- Take the 1940 design and upgrade it with better steel and real G10 handles - made in the US
- Create a plain edge 1940 style blade but with the flipper design of the 1790 (looks and feels better)
- Either make the thumb studs functional for opening or revert to the 1940 locking design
- Fix the height of the liner lock and use a titanium liner
- Upgrade your US quality
- Minimize / eliminate the "dip" between the front guard and the beginning of the cutting surface. This can catch rope or other material you are trying to cut.
I bought a Kershaw Compound 1940ST (made in China) recently for under $20 and have been thrilled with the knife and amazed at the quality. I liked it so much, I decided up upgrade the following week by buying the similar but US made Kershaw Turbulence 1790 which I received tonight.
There are many positive qualities about both knives, but since this is a complaint, I'll ignore the positive bits.
I was a little disappointed to find that the finish on the US Made Turbulence was not as good as the similar Chinese model.
Most visibly, the edge of the liner has tool marks it looks like there was an attempt made to buff these marks out, but it still doesn't compare to the quality in the 1940ST.
The thumb studs are non-functional for opening the knife and appear to act as rotation stops in the open and closed position.
The liner lock is almost even height with the edge of the handle and has rounded corners. This prevents me from unlocking the knife using the flesh of my thumb - I have to use my thumb nail.
The opening action is also not as smooth as the Compound 1940. If I slowly depress the flipper, it will not open into the fully locked position.
Kershaw - if you're listening, here are a few observations / feedback after playing with both knives:
- Take the 1940 design and upgrade it with better steel and real G10 handles - made in the US
- Create a plain edge 1940 style blade but with the flipper design of the 1790 (looks and feels better)
- Either make the thumb studs functional for opening or revert to the 1940 locking design
- Fix the height of the liner lock and use a titanium liner

- Upgrade your US quality
- Minimize / eliminate the "dip" between the front guard and the beginning of the cutting surface. This can catch rope or other material you are trying to cut.