Photos Knife Photos with Easy/Cheap Set Up

This is so cheap, it's ridiculous, but it has a very good pedigree....
50018064597_14e9393b46_o.jpg

Kai Luna Santoku - their listing says it's 7 in - but my measurement 6.5 in.
Most listings just say high carbon stainless steel - but Kai's website says German DIN1.4116 with 56-57HRC - not sterling (ha-ha! it's steel, sorry could not resist the pun) but more than acceptable.

Kai of course is the parent company of Kershaw, Zero Tolerance, Shun Cutlery, and Kai has several lines of kitchen cutlery - the Luna and Inspire are the cheap ones...
How ridiculously cheap? At Amazon now it's under $8. I paid slightly more than that earlier for this one.

Blade -
50017275798_43849c1627_o.jpg

mirror polish, hammered (tsuchi) finish looks attractive. Knife is light as the handle is plastic/resin with light gray soft-grip inserts. 3.75oz and the balance point is perfect for pinch grip at the blade, and suitable for the finger tip grip.

The sheath is really useful - but is pretty tight and has put those very fine scratches on the blade.

Listing says it's sharpened to 16deg per side.... but I seriously doubt that - as I did my usual sharpening/re-profiling on the Work Sharp Bench Grinder attachment at 10 deg to knock off the hard shoulder at the bevel - then sharpen at 15 deg - only 1 deg difference easily within my margin of error in keeping horizontal - the original edge bevel was substantially/noticeably more obtuse - had to grind quite extensively with X65 (200 grit) coarse belt to get the new convex bevel to reach the actual edge...... The bevel was also asymmetrical - so much for Kai of Seki City famous for blade/sword makers - this knife is made in China!

USB microscope pictures of edge about 2.5" from tip:
Logo side (notice how extensive the bevel is) -
50018064622_ed7d47f085_o.jpg

other side:
50018064612_1f35af24ff_o.jpg

The knife was reasonably sharp out of the box - but now it's woo-hoo! DIN1.4116 is pretty fine grained and can be sharpened really well, lots of high quality (Western) kitchen knives used to be made with this, this steel makes the knife very durable and able to stand up to mishaps and dare I say it unintentional/uninformed abuse.

Size -
50017803021_f426889b41_o.jpg

Santoku is a handy size for general purpose kitchen usage. For the price - one couldn't even buy most 3" paring knives....

I highly recommend watching this video (nearly 14mins) all the way through - there is a wealth of information about knife handling, grip, handles and choice of steels/hardness.
In particular about steels used in knives - it is NOT just a case of the harder the better - it is not always about edge retention, but suitability of the food being prepared - it is a serious error to use a exotic/high tech powdered steel at 62+HRC to chop through bones....
watch the above video at 9:49 (link to that starting point)

EDIT to ADD -

This was so cheap I simply had to buy another.
and boy was I lucky!

This second one was even better....
50031985898_f22bc87aed_o.jpg

50032782732_7533fe1896_o.jpg

50031985883_c547958121_o.jpg

50032782677_8e3954f815_o.jpg

The blade face is even more obviously convex - it even looks prettier. Since I was aware the sheath can scratch the blade - haven't used it yet.
That's why the blade is still pristine.

It should be noted these are thin - 1.66mm at the spine (but the hammered finish might prevent a good measurement - so the thickness at the face right after the hammered part is 1.48mm, and right behind the edge is about 0.82mm. A good thickness, thick enough for heft and stiffness, yet thin enough to behave/cut like a Japanese knife. Light at 3.74oz.

USB microscope pic of edge about 2.5" from tip -
logo side:
50031985838_81d60e4c3b_o.jpg

back side -
50032523071_e84757bd9f_o.jpg

Do my usual sharpening with Work Sharp Bench Grinder - first at 10deg just to remove the hard shoulder at the bevel - and was shocked to find that simply blended with the existing bevel - WoW! that is acute! then finished off with 15deg.

USB microscope of 10 then 15 deg convex sharpening -
logo side -
50060714916_7871575e0d_o.jpg

back side -
50060960527_5dc5d40edc_o.jpg

They almost look the same as the original edge - but I know I worked on the edge.

The reason why these look the same as the original, is simply because I did the cardinal sin of not reaching the edge, and was only grinding the shoulder of the old/original bevel - I am really embarrassed :oops: to have made such a basic fundamental error (please see the corrected pics in EDIT to ADD 4 below).

So what to do with the first knife?
Put a MicroForge edge on it to compare back-to-back.

USB microscope -
first Luna Santoku MicroForged - logo side
50060960537_11f5970788_o.jpg

back side -
50060151798_97f272ffc9_o.jpg


My thoughts - these Kai Luna Santokus (other than being cheap) have DIN1.4116 stainless steel @ 56-57HRC - may seem laughable compared to the 60+HRC stuff I have.

BUT there is a HUGE advantage of this so called softer steel. It might not hold an edge as long as 60HRC - but it is less brittle (too many people complain about their premium knives chipping) durable and can stand up to inadvertent/unintended abuse.

DIN1.4116 was a "premium" steel for top German chef's knives - they have an entirely different intended purpose of being able to do almost everything in the kitchen.

Of course Gyutos and Japanese fusion knives have "superior" steels - for edge holding and ability to take and hold more acute angles - but they are much more brittle - hence the too many complaints of chipping - because most westerners use a Gyuto like a regular western chef's knife!!! and chopping through bones? a NO-NO for Gyutos but quite common for regular western chef's knives. People were outraged when some western chef's knives were dropped in hardness to 55-56HRC - just because of possible abuse in the kitchen - think about it.

So in this cheapo Kai Luna Santoku - I have a knife - that's as tough as an old school western chef's knife (meant to be able to do everything) - this Santoku has a convex grind and acute edge - so behaves more like a sharper Japanese knife.

By putting a real convex edge on it - gives it a slight advantage of more durable edge - and to crown it with Work Sharp's MicroForge - gives it an edge that lasts longer.....

My story, my take - for less than $8, I have a knife that is functionally superior (for my home use) to most of my more exotic knives with high HRC... I may have to come back and take it all back - but I don't think that'll happen....

EDIT to ADD 2 -
I thought under $8 was already ridiculous -
well... they are down to under $7 now - get more than one.....

EDIT to ADD 3
-
When used back-to-back for my type of kitchen cutting, the MicroForged version despite being not quite as nice/good as the newer 10 then 15 deg sharpened knife - out cuts it and feels really aggressive in slicing - I think after a few more days (just to be sure) - I am likely to put the MicroForge on this newer one too. I'll probably do it in a new post with photos of the process. NOTE: this is flawed/incorrect as my original 10-15deg sharpening didn't even reach the edge - I've discovered and corrected this, see EDIT to ADD 4 below.

EDIT to ADD 4 -

The USB microscope pics above of my 10 then 15 deg sharpening - embarrassingly are completely misleading - as it didn't even reach the edge - I had only ground the shoulder of the original edge bevel!

I noticed this when I went to do a refresh sharpen before putting on MicroForge, and wondered why I did not seem to be raising a burr. Ah! the penny finally dropped, and I had to really do some extensive grinding to reach anywhere near the edge - so again like the first, this nicer second one had an edge that was more obtuse than the advertised 16deg.

Below finally the correct USB microscope pics -
Logo side @ about 2.5" from tip (toward top left)-
50082378567_9fb80461ca_o.jpg


other side (tip toward top right)
50081552998_348ab3d95a_o.jpg

BUT now that I've put a proper edge on this second Santoku - all my back-to-back comparisons with the MicroForged first one, are now all invalid - so I'll have to do the comparisons again to see if I am going to put the MicroForge on this second (properly) sharpened one.

Sorry for my very embarrassing :oops: mistake.

EDIT to ADD 5 -

See Post #51 (link) to mitigate/minimize sheath scratching the blade.

--
Vincent
https://Flickr.com/UnknownVincent/albums
https://Youtube.com/user/vtVincent
https://Goo.gl/q91ZNw
http://UnknownVincent.Shutterfly.com
http://UnknownVT.Shutterfly.com






.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Shi Ba Zi Zuo is reputed to be the best brand of Chinese cleavers.
So while at my local Chinese supermarket among several other Chinese cleavers I saw this:
50042030637_a29d3c6407_o.jpg

Ah! but it does not say Shi Ba Zi Zuo...
50042030842_cf3be499af_o.jpg

BUT the SBZZ on the handle is a dead giveaway!
then there's the etched logo -
50041771776_f13c81f95b_o.jpg

the highlighted words - 十八子作 - is Shi Ba Zi Zuo in Chinese
十八 is ten and eight = eighteen
子 in this context probably means sons (no wonder they are so (re)productive! :p) or children/descendants...
作 means make or made

After I got home saw the end cap -
50041771821_338bcb2113_o.jpg


So this is a Shi Ba Zi Zuo cleaver - just sold under a different brand name - being from a Chinese supermarket the price was reasonable - or in other words, ridiculously cheap (see highlight in first pic). Most of the competitive prices on the web are closer to the mid-$20's and some as high as over $50.....

This is the #2 size with 8 inch blade...
50041217153_ccc364481f_o.jpg

I believe the standard #1 blade size is 9 inches -
it's important to watch this video -
This is a highly experienced chef/user with great knowledge and experience - he was not enthralled with his P01 9 in version.....

Since this is my first and only Chinese cleaver - I definitely defer to his experience and take -
BUT I have the P02 - 8 in version, and although it is unmistakably blade heavy balance - it is supposed to be, as it is a cleaver. The balance point between the 鋼 (steel) and the 刀 (knife) characters - which makes it for a pinch grip - albeit a bit of a stretch - or a two fingered pinch grip (more choked up). At 13.59 oz/385.27g it is not a light knife - this is exaggerated by the very blade heavy balance.

[BTW - 不銹鋼 = no rust steel = stainless steel]

But once I got used to the knife/overcome my initial impressions and the video's conclusions...
I decided (caveat: as a new/inexperienced Chinese cleaver owner) it is what I should expect from a Chinese cleaver (remember this is the #2, 8 in version) the balance point is for me "perfect" for a cleaver general purpose Chinese kitchen knife - even in a pinch grip it is still slightly blade heavy, but that is to be expected for the type of knife and usage.

Contrary to the video - I like the handle - for my hold(s) in actual use, it's fine - PLUS I like it's all stainless steel, with a grip-y satin finish - unlike the wood handles in the more recommended versions - wood will have maintenance, hygiene, and durability issues.

The blade profile is convex - this shows the knife is well thought out and designed:
50041217208_9dd9c5481c_o.jpg

Not only that, the profile at the front of the knife is narrower/more acute compared to above, at the heel -
50042116246_f908e0f02d_o.jpg


Another thing mentioned in the video is the possibility of having different sharpening angles between the front of the blade for cutting, and toward the heel for chopping.

I thought I saw it on this SBZZ cleaver:
50042030792_410920577a_o.jpg

BUT the position doesn't seem to make sense as it is only about 1/4 -1/3 from front of the blade. I would have expected more like 1/4-1/3 from the heel -

So USB microscope pic:
50041771691_e468b57789_o.jpg


yes, I can see that - but I think it is merely a different direction for the sharpening/honing - a different sharpening angle should give a different bevel shoulder. Here there is no difference.

Anyway that is my take (with the heavy caveat this is my first and only Chinese cleaver) - and I seriously defer to the video.

EDIT to ADD -

I was intrigued by the possibility of sharpening with different angles at the front and toward the heel of the blade. As the knife was only adequately sharp even for a cleaver - I thought I'd give differential angles a try.

For the front I put 20degs which is a respectable angle for a kitchen knife for durability and 25deg for the rear 1/3 heel part for chopping through bone....

Used the original Work Sharp sharpener
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/work-sharp-belt-grinder-knife-sharpener.876346/
To get 20deg was easy one merely holds the blade vertically.
25deg was as easy with the outdoor guide...
Logo side: front of knife to the left
50047847753_a10be53de4_o.jpg


back side: front of knife to the right
50048409196_2598a15223_o.jpg


Logo side - front of knife toward top
50048663467_90dbab8fc2_o.jpg


back side: front to knife toward top
50047847758_3fbe31e2bf_o.jpg


USB microscope
logo side: front toward top/right
50048663397_253e428e33_o.jpg


back side: front toward top/left
50048663427_4efa8c2148_o.jpg


from my (differential) sharpening - I think the original angle was close to 25deg for the whole length of the blade. Using the Work Sharp sharpener, made this experiment very easy and quick.

The new edge(s) are convex bevels which should help with edge retention/durability, even if the steel is not "hard" - remember hard is NOT always good - especially for a cleaver style knife.

--
Vincent
https://Flickr.com/UnknownVincent/albums
https://Youtube.com/user/vtVincent
https://Goo.gl/q91ZNw
http://UnknownVincent.Shutterfly.com
http://UnknownVT.Shutterfly.com






.
 
Last edited:
One of the most beautiful blades series I've ever seen. I have shown the 9.5" and 8" chefs (and the sad story of the 3.5" paring), this is the 5.5" Santoku in the same TUO Ring-H series -
50052016906_318fa4e687_o.jpg

50051443758_9129746709_o.jpg


close up of blade -
50052016761_9cccd42693_o.jpg

50052016731_da8510a228_o.jpg

To my eyes a very unique pattern as opposed to just boosting the number of layers, and the hammering (tsuchime) is not random but done to help emphasize the pattern.

This is carried out through the series -
Post #6 (link) 3.5" paring
Post #13 (link) 9.5" chef
Post #34 (link) 8" chef

Size -
50051443718_b846da1808_o.jpg

50052262397_4eefb631a1_o.jpg



--
Vincent
https://Flickr.com/UnknownVincent/albums
https://Youtube.com/user/vtVincent
https://Goo.gl/q91ZNw
http://UnknownVincent.Shutterfly.com
http://UnknownVT.Shutterfly.com






.
 
Last edited:
Wow - lots to see and learn from this thread. I'm marking it so that I will come back. ;)
Thank you Vincent, U UnknownVT
 
Wow - lots to see and learn from this thread. I'm marking it so that I will come back. ;)
Thank you Vincent, U UnknownVT

Thank you very much for your kind comments.

Everything for taking photos is kept as simple and economical as possible.

Below are the only accessories I normally use:
50055473317_1df9511e6f_o.jpg

Black flock/felt material and a white piece of card for the background(s).
SAK (Swiss Army Knife - Spartan), a penny, and ruler for size comparisons.

That's a +3 close-up lens (Hoya HMC), if I need to get closer.

The only other accessory -
50055227031_c6e575d826_o.jpg

[not my image - taken off the web and re-hosted]
double sided folding 18% grey and "pure" white card for setting white balance for my LED light bulbs. This needs only be done once for my set up, as my lights don't change.

For my backgrounds - just black or white - on the white piece of card things are very easy. In my photo editor I merely point the white point somewhere on the "white" background - and turns to "pure" white (255,255,255) there is some flexibility by pointing the white point on different part of the white background can vary the 'brightness" of the photo.

Black is almost as simple - although I have to select the knife, invert the selection, then turn everything else to minimum brightness and contrast - ie: black as it can get.
Cannot use fill tool, as the felt material has too much texture and the camera picks up all that detail, the fill will either not be complete, or filling between the fibers and exaggerating the texture - exactly opposite to intention.

The BIG variable - is the tilt of that $1 white foam art board (don't cheap out - after all it's only $1! :p).

This controls how the knife is lit, and most importantly what gets reflected for mirror polished blades.

To avoid the dreaded flesh tones in the reflection - I wear black gloves:
49811330191_98a57cf4fd_o.jpg

These are thin glove liners - Thermasilk - I don't think they're real silk - just the brand name, but any black gloves will do - personally the thinner the better.

Over the years I found resting the board (that's why the foam art board is great - as it is light and pretty rigid) on the lens barrel and watching through the lens viewfinder or back LCD to check for best lighting/modelling and reflections.

Sometimes a tiny change can make all the difference. eg: the TUO TC0302H 5.5" Santoku in post #44 (link) above - I took the blade close up -
50054858803_313ec0c35c_o.jpg

Have to balance getting the hammering indents to show and the "Damascus" pattern/contour lines toward the edge to show well.

A slight almost imperceptible tilt difference
50052016761_9cccd42693_o.jpg

avoided that black "bump" reflection at the middle of the edge of the first pic...

--
Vincent
https://Flickr.com/UnknownVincent/albums
https://Youtube.com/user/vtVincent
https://Goo.gl/q91ZNw
http://UnknownVincent.Shutterfly.com
http://UnknownVT.Shutterfly.com






.
 
Last edited:
Some exceptional customs in your thread but I must say this one is my favorite -

The Paul Chen/Hanwei Canton knife - oh my - what a beauty!
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Kai Luna Asian Utility 6.5" -
50085348507_244a0c62f2_o.jpg

50085348542_b9521e771a_o.jpg

In the same series as the bargain Santokus (see Post #41 (link))
Tsuchime (hammered) finish D1.4116 steel @ 56-57HRC - traditional Japanese Bunka bōchō (文化包丁) shape.
Just a little thicker and heavier than the Santokus at 2.0mm at spine and face just after the hammering and 0.77mm behind the edge, and 4.57oz.

From previous experience of the Santokus - the sheath seems likely to scratch the blade - so I made sure I didn't use the sheath before taking the photos.
50085348477_f9c0d0762c_o.jpg

50085348577_99cf40aab2_o.jpg

Size:
50085116296_85cb700286_o.jpg

The Santoku is listed as 7", but one can clearly see it's the same size as the 6.5" Asian Utility/Bunka.

Again from previous experience of 2 Santokus, I am dubious of the listed edge angle of 16degs - I haven't attempted to sharpen this yet, to say for sure - but I do like the thickness behind the edge being actually thinner than the Santokus, despite the blade being overall thicker.

A Bunka is supposed to be a general purpose home kitchen knife in Japan - as the Santoku. The Bunka is no longer commonplace - due to the popularity of the Santoku worldwide.

The more substantial blade does not mean it's for chopping bones - Japanese home cooking rarely have boned meat - those are prepared by the butchers. So both Santoku and Bunkas are for cutting vegetables, boneless meat and fish. The Bunka is better for preparing fish because of its pointed tip - but NOT for any professional fish prep, they have much more specialized, and much sharper knives for that.

--
Vincent
https://Flickr.com/UnknownVincent/albums
https://Youtube.com/user/vtVincent
https://Goo.gl/q91ZNw
http://UnknownVincent.Shutterfly.com
http://UnknownVT.Shutterfly.com






.
 
Last edited:
Didn't know anything about these knives, was told about them by a person that I hold in very high regard about knives, sharpness, and sharpening.

...and because these knives are so cheap, I had to try one

50095725977_5b42f3e8d1_o.jpg

Do a web search on Kiwi knives, they have almost a universal reputation of being really sharp but cheap (I thought that was mutually exclusive - the stainless steel cannot possibly be high tech, and probably "junk" steel)....
50094915598_4a9df9944a_o.jpg

I got the model 171P. "P" = plastic handle, over the wood handle version - easier to maintain and more hygienic. The wood handle looked like a partial tang, with possible gaps between it and the blade.

Size:
50095498061_888df4d8fd_o.jpg

6" blade "Bunka" shaped.

50094915488_932e406dff_o.jpg


50094915623_2eaa08ba2b_o.jpg

Blade is really thin - 1.1mm at the spine, but more important only 0.39mm just behind the edge.
Light at 2.51oz.

The factory edge was not that great - I could see shiny flats - not damage - but burr or edge rollover. The knife does cut through well, even though it was somewhat "impeded" when slicing paper* (more later)

The reason why it cut through so well is because of the hollow grind that maintains that behind the edge thinness.

Shiny flats or rollover edge, had to be fixed

USB microscope - original edge about 2.5" from tip
logo side - (tip toward top-right)
50094915493_6ce572fd79_o.jpg

other side (tip toward top-left)
50095725857_6ff1e3aabe_o.jpg

I was advised to use 17deg sharpening for almost all knives -
so 17deg sharpening on Work Sharp Bench Grinder
logo side:
50095497991_1b780b12a2_o.jpg

other side -
50095498001_5535008318_o.jpg

These are close to being micro bevels due to the thinness of the blade.

BUT I have to note: even when using X4 belt (fine = 3,000 grit) the edge was still producing burr, or perhaps rollover and even on the finishing 12,000grit belt I could still see burr or rollover(?)

This is where I remembered slicing paper* would remove these - and it certainly did.

The knife is now woo-hoo! sharp - I don't know how long the edge would last, since this is probably pretty "soft" steel - but the blade thinness and the convex bevel would allow the knife to stay/feel sharp.

I'll see, and I can do a MicroForge to get better edge retention.

--
Vincent
https://Flickr.com/UnknownVincent/albums
https://Youtube.com/user/vtVincent
https://Goo.gl/q91ZNw
http://UnknownVincent.Shutterfly.com
http://UnknownVT.Shutterfly.com






.
 
Last edited:
The sheath is really useful - but is pretty tight and has put those very fine scratches on the blade.
50018064597_14e9393b46_o.jpg

I may have found a way to mitigate/minimize the sheath scratching the blade -

Sheath opening -
50098294786_ac6e21c4af_o.jpg

sheath is very clever in having that narrowing/"restricture" to clasp the blade - but being pretty tight probably was the reason my blade was scratched.

Attempt to mitigate/minimize this - file the narrowest part of the opening, and the first cutout which seems to be the tightest part -
50097710963_c0df3f6af8_o.jpg

SAK file fits nicely and does the job - and can file both sides at the same time.

Brush and tap out the plastic shaving - drop food grade mineral oil to the narrowest/clamping part of the opening - my sheaths no longer seem to be scratching the blade face(s).. so far.

--
Vincent
https://Flickr.com/UnknownVincent/albums
https://Youtube.com/user/vtVincent
https://Goo.gl/q91ZNw
http://UnknownVincent.Shutterfly.com
http://UnknownVT.Shutterfly.com






.
 
Last edited:
Shun Sora 6" Chef -
50134890283_6e76f488a2_o.jpg

50135671112_e75e70e5f9_o.jpg

I was told about this as one of the knives to look at. At first I didn't pay much attention, until it was pointed out it was a composite blade - even then I didn't realize its significance. After all I've had a Kershaw composite blade Leek for several years -
Kershaw Leek 1660 CB - composite blade -
50138207658_88e0dd2513_o.jpg

marked Mar 08 - so over 12 years old.

So why did this Shun Sora get my interest?

Ah! it was what I was told next that got me - the edge section is clad or san mai vg10.

For many years Japanese have been producing kitchen knives that have been promoted as based on traditional Katana/sword making, as if that has real significance for dicing tomatoes.....

The most common/popular method was to clad the blade's harder core with softer more stain-resistant steel like 416, and the fancier - "damascus" clad. This seems to give a more resilient blade, able to stand up to the rigors of kitchen usage.

Many people do use Japanese kitchen knives like regular western chef's knives - as we were told the Japanese Gyuto is really a Japanese version of the western chef's knife...

The problem is Japanese knives use harder steels that can take and hold more acute edge angles, BUT those steels are not invulnerable - and are noticeably more brittle - hence the many, many complaints of expensive/sophisticated Japanese knives chipping. These steels are just not designed for the rigors of western chef's knives.

So when I was told one should not smash garlic with a Japanese knife - and I'd been doing this for years with my "prized" hand forged Shigeki Tanaka "damascus" clad santoku (post #29 - link) - I was initially skeptical - then actually shocked I was actively "abusing" my knife.

Cladding does help mitigate some of the durability issues - but the hard core extends all the way to the spine - ie: the full face of the blade. So the brittleness/fragility extends to the full face of the blade.....

Samurai sword construction starts to make some sense, but just cladding may not be enough.

One of the traditional sword construction was to have a hard edge (hagane) but the rest of the blade made with medium hard steel (kawagane) - called Waiha Tetsu. That's why this composite construction starts to make sense -

From a Shun Sora promo video frame grab -

50135283633_3a75065d91_o.jpg


then to further protect the hard core with a san mai/clad/sandwich structure is about as good as I currently can think of.

50135671157_d39bac9d17_o.jpg

50135435241_3decd8f03f_o.jpg

Picked the 6" Chef - because I wanted a "smaller" utility type knife - but the actual utility knife in the Sora series is more traditional Japanese Petty shaped - ie: very narrow:

Size compared with a Japanese 6" Petty/utility -
50135671217_117ae0c7fa_o.jpg


The Sora 6" Chef is more Chef shaped and wider - somewhat like one of my favorite utility knives -
50136024882_32078954dd_o.jpg


The Sora series is made with the main face of 420J - yes, laughable - but in this composite construction, it's about as good as it can get - as 420J is extremely stain-resistant, and one of the toughest stainless steels (dive knives are made with 420J)

The cutting edge part - vg10 core, one of the most popular quality Japanese kitchen knife steels - the outer san mai cladding is not given - but only makes sense if it is one of the lower 400 series stainless steels.

Construction:
50135788691_8536ac3678_o.jpg

Crop to show detail -
50139287336_0a504838e6_o.jpg

50136024922_78bc8414d5_o.jpg

Crop detail -
50139525252_b17d8fbdd5_o.jpg


Handle is PP/TPE - I actually like resin/plastic handles, they may not be as aesthetically pleasing - but are practical, hygienic and durable and the Sora handle feels really comfortable for my usage.

Shun Sora claim 16 deg sharpening - and the knife is very sharp in my usage - Shun has a very good reliable reputation for the quality of their knives.

USB microscope pics:
logo side (that's the side of the first two pics in this post) - tip to top left -
50136024827_386ee84a3d_o.jpg


other side (tip to top right) -
50136024812_d86afe5136_o.jpg

these microscope pics (like the main photos) were surprisingly difficult to take, due to the full mirror polish. For the microscope pics the mirror finish reflected the LED lighting directly back into the lens causing real exposure issues.

More USB microscope pics -
braze joint of the composite construction (edge at top) -
50135814561_5de7051e05_o.jpg


and... the edge of the san mai cladding to vg10 core - hard to even find using the microscope due to scattered reflection of the bead-blast finish of that section (edge at top) -
50135814531_51b1d7df62_o.jpg


Overall I am very pleased with this Shun Sora 6" Chef - suits me as a "utility" knife - where the utility of the series was just too narrow. I'd probably still avoid smashing garlic with this knife - but am truly impressed with its construction.

--
Vincent
https://Flickr.com/UnknownVincent/albums
https://Youtube.com/user/vtVincent
https://Goo.gl/q91ZNw
http://UnknownVincent.Shutterfly.com
http://UnknownVT.Shutterfly.com






.
 
Last edited:
50442807032_21ebcd70a8_o.jpg

Victorinox Classic SD silver Alox (aluminum) handle

Big life-long SAK (Swiss Army Knife) fan and user.

Useful tools in a tiny key-ring sized package, and the best-selling SAK.

Size:
50442628906_60459a496b_o.jpg

size comparison with "standard" 91mm SAK and the regular red plastic handled Classic SD - Alox version loses the toothpick and tweezers. Classics are 58mm = 2.28in.

The most/more desirable version of the Alox is/was the red anodized -
50441935653_c7c0e72b0b_o.jpg

at one time most common, but now it's fashionable and in demand -

so much so, it was a 2018 special limited edition - so they could sell it at a premium -
50442806927_93feec78bc_o.jpg

2018 Limited Edition Red "berry" version - obviously - made to sell at a premium. At one time red was the standard/common color for Alox.....

Some may think anodized is more durable - it is, but the silver Alox is anodized, so it gives nothing away to the red, other than the more desirable red color. Silver has a HUGE advantage - as it is the underlying aluminum alloy color - so will not show wear as obviously as the red or another color, but being significantly more expensive, the 2018 limited edition red berry is probably unlikely to be used.....

The SD in the name stands for Screw-Driver tip on the nail file.
50442629006_da02656308_o.jpg

SD = Screw-Driver tip on the nail file

Over the (many) years I have found the nail-file to be one of the best I have used -
50442628396_2346121d0c_o.jpg

extreme close-up of the nail-file texture.

This is a really nice inexpensive and useful non-threatening knife.

Often obtainable at low price (esp plastic handle) due to the large numbers "confiscated"/profiteered at airport security - when forgotten still attached to key-rings....

I've used the 91mm SAK for knife size comparisons - because a SAK is mandatory for any knife enthusiast - I don't need to say anything about the 58mm Victorinox Classic - most people have one - or many ....

--
Vincent
https://Flickr.com/UnknownVincent/albums
https://Youtube.com/user/vtVincent
https://Goo.gl/q91ZNw
http://UnknownVincent.Shutterfly.com
http://UnknownVT.Shutterfly.com





.
 
Last edited:
51001743551_36a1276a52_o.jpg

The common terminology in the UK was sheath knives. For these that's the "operative" term. Started with my re-discovery of one of my oldest sheath knives a KJ Eriksson Mora - that I thought was a plastic Puukko. (Please see previous POST (link))

But it was that hard poly tube-type compact sheath which sold me in the first place.

Obviously since then I discovered many Mora/MoraKniv came standard with that kind of sheath.
Please see this earlier POST (link) on the MoraKniv 125 Anniversary Companion.

Cold Steel had the Finn Bear a Puukko like knife (left in above pic) - but it initially came in a cordura, pouch sheath - then more recently supplied with the hard poly tube like sheath called Secure-Ex.

In the course of looking at the Finn Bear, I came across the Pendleton Lite Hunter - which seemed very highly regarded - that also is more recently supplied with the Secure-Ex sheath - that just made me interested.

51001043148_e7067d496e_o.jpg[


51001043258_e85e950032_o.jpg
51001043258_2ae2e4a6c5_o.jpg


51001861076_84078b277e_o.jpg


51001978217_9213dd805e_o.jpg


51001043323_8c0a3b85c4_o.jpg


51001861907_b46a0bc77b_o.jpg


Steel is the Krupp 4116 - same/similar steel in the top European chef's knives like Wusthof and Henckels. May not be as exotic as the Japanese kitchen knife steels - but stands up to typical Western kitchen use/abuse - which is what an outdoors knife has to be able to do....

--
Vincent
https://Flickr.com/UnknownVincent/albums
https://Youtube.com/user/vtVincent
https://Goo.gl/q91ZNw
http://UnknownVincent.Shutterfly.com
http://UnknownVT.Shutterfly.com






.
 
Last edited:
51045056341_ed55eb0604_o.jpg

These are what others aspire to....
51045186207_da0a7a7a19_o.jpg


The sheath I like so much is standard on MoraKniv...
51045148352_6fe2a7a971_o.jpg


other side:
51045056511_cf3ec12a28_o.jpg

The clip/belt loop has been imitated... but missed is that nub/protrusion at the opening of the sheath - it's an aid to safely rest the thumb when extracting the knife, since the sheaths are tight for a secure fit.

51044325073_9c3afb02d9_o.jpg


51044325103_a88f8ab68c_o.jpg


125 Anniversary Companion please see Post #42 (link) above.
51044324993_9f7ed73d4d_o.jpg

Both have the famous Scandi-grind - ie: the saber grind is taken all the way to the edge - without a separate bevel (zero bevel edge - without separate (micro)bevel )

This regular edition has a huge advantage - it is mirror polished, so the edge formed is polished - USB microscope:
51045157742_5b54b56a0f_o.jpg


51044334538_d35b75989d_o.jpg


Compare these to the USB microscope pics of the 125 Anniversary edition.


--
Vincent
https://Flickr.com/UnknownVincent/albums
https://Youtube.com/user/vtVincent
https://Goo.gl/q91ZNw
http://UnknownVincent.Shutterfly.com
http://UnknownVT.Shutterfly.com






.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top