- Joined
- Sep 14, 2019
- Messages
- 45
What’s a knife that you think didn’t live up to the hype surrounding it when you got it?
I don't see much difference relative to the nail nick. I like Peanuts, but at this point in time they are still a little small for me when the Vic Small Tinker being just a little larger is much more useable and has the extra tools to boot.For me it was probably the Case peanut, I've always heard how great they are and I thought I'd love it so much.
Then I got one and it's a great little knife but I don't love it as much as I thought I would .
They're a great little knife but I've come to realize I find the aesthetics a bit off.
It's not a real deal breaker, there's just one thing that really bothers me.
Here's the case peanut
And here's the half whittler
The peanut is a great little knife, but the half whittler gives you the same blades in a slightly better package.
It's a little bigger but it's also a little slimmer .
My biggest issue with the peanut is the placement of the nail nick which just makes the blade look like it has an ugly sharp peak on the top of the blade, and makes it feel a bit weird when opening the blade.
Comparing it to the half whittler the main blades really are identical with the exception of the nail nick placement.
If the peanut has the same nail nick placement it would look so much better and everything else about it that I like a little less than the half whittler would not bother me at all.
It's crazy to think that this one detail can make as much of a difference as it does , but I really does make a difference.
I'm sure I'll catch a lot of flack...but Shirogorov, certainly nice but not at the hyped up import prices.