This reminds me of a paragraph in Bob Terzuola's book on tactical knives where he tips his hat to knifemaker's who pin their knives together. He says something along the lines of, "I use screws because I can take it apart and adjust things IF I NEED TO. I'm just to scared to trust pinning a knife once and for all." That paragraph has a similar resonance for me to the debate over CNC programming and tools vs. "handmade". I suppose once upon a time a blacksmith who used hammers and files felt that grinders/belt sanders were anathema and not "REAL" knifemaking tools (some still do I bet..................). There's no right answer for everyone.
But...........
I can tell you that I won't be buying/collecting any expensive, CNC-produced, tactical knives when there are old classics that suit my idea of knives better. I consider them production knives, regardless of the design and programming skill required to produce the parts. That is not to say that the hand fitting and finishing doesn't take a great deal of skill, I KNOW IT DOES, I just don't view the end product as unique and worth hundreds, or thousands, of dollars more then I'd spend for a perfectly usable Spyderco, Kershaw, SOG, Lone Wolf or whatever. If I buy a knife to carry and use, as opposed to as a "collectable," I take the chance of losing it, or breaking it by accident (doesn't happen often but it can). I treat it as a tool that might get used up, and I'm not concerned with its future value. I'm concerned with its utility as a tool when I need it.
If a custom maker chooses to catch up on his backlog by acquiring high tech tooling, that is a personal decision, just as my choice, whether to buy a CNC product or not, is. If their customers are happy I say that's great.
Syn