Kukris and stab ability

Joined
Mar 5, 2011
Messages
544
I've been doing some thinking about what makes a survival/heavy woods-brush/fighting knife lately. The Kukri really does have some of the best things going for it. One thing I have been tossing aboutthough is the point - The kukri point is softer in this area, and bieng out of line with the user's hand, gives it some difficulty in this area. That's not to say it cannot be done, just that it is slightly more difficult.

I'm curious on everyone's opinion - Is the Kukri really a stabbing blade, or is this a feature that is best avoided? please explain why or why not.

Like wise, what other features should a survival knife have? By that, I don't mean the ability to hold a compass and fishing line, but rahter, for example the kukri as it functions now is a knife AND an ax. Would incorporating another tool be beneficial, or would it actually encumber the design?
 
Do you really need to stab when you have a blade capable of taking someone's hand off? :cool:

Seriously though, I've experimented with them and a Sirupati can stab fairly well.
 
As far stabbing is concerned: possible, but really not what a kukri would be good at. Not just due to the point, but because of the balance. You couldn't stab with it like a dagger but more like a sabre or similar weapon.
That is not to say that you can't utilise the tip, just that it isn't really meant to be like that.

As for what a survival knife should do: be tough, handle wood and bone, be resilient to large variety of environments, be able to use against firesteel yet also be light enough to carry.
In essence, something along the lines of the Mora Bushcraft Survival. Of course, similar knives can do the same.

Is a kukri a good general survival knife? Mine is more along the lines of a small axe, but so far of what I seen and did from it I would go towards a positive response. After all, they are made by a people that use it for similar tasks than in a survival situation: cut wood, prepare food, etc.
However, which kukri? My 18" CAK or one of the 12" ones? Ang Kholas or Kobras?
It has to be kept in mind that a machete is good in some environments while disadvantageous in others (I'm thinking primarily a bamboo forest). Same goes for an axe. A kukri, imo, is a hybrid of the two: not ideal but good for both situations.

But in the end, I think a kukri will not and perhaps should not be in every emergency survival pack, like the Bushcraft above. A kukri would do good perhaps as a big knife/axe/machete substitute. But I would say that a smaller knife may more prudent (which is why the karda is good thing to include).
 
Some models would be better adapted to stabbing - or other uses of the point, like starting the hole in the fire board for the bow/drill method of fire making - than others.

I'd be willing to bet that those who practice with sirupatis and kobras (and other khuks) as martial arts tools have developed stabbing techniques that work with them.

As for features of a survival knife. . . A lot of that is personal preference. There has been and will continue to be endless discussion/debate/argument over what's best.

In my opinion, above all else a survival knife should be simple. It seems to me that the more functions you try to build in to it, the less well it will be able to perform any of those functions. I'll leave it at that.

If you do a bit of searching you'll be able to find all kinds of discussion in the great outdoors sub-forum (or on any other camping/backpacking/hunting/survival forums) about blade shapes and sizes and grinds and any other finer details of knife design that make the "perfect" survival knife.
 
Kukris stab quite well as a matter of fact. I've stabbed my CAK through some serious plywood. The tip is strong, and other than a few models with really rounded ends (like the WWII), they have good sharp tips. The method isn't much different than a straight knife.

I hate to link to another kukri site, but they diallow saving their pics, so go HERE and click on "stabbing" on the right hand menu and it walks you through it.


IMO kukri are the best thought out survival system there is. You have a main tool that can slash stalky vegetation as well or better than a machete, chop as well as the same length of axe, anmd fight, if you have to. They are also smart enough to include a small knife (karda) for small tasks, and a sharpening steel (chakma) all in the same sheath.

Want to know if it's good? Look at Wildmike's posts where he talks about being homeless and using the M43 he has to live day to day life, including building two trapper's cabins . Namely Post 4 here, and Post 4 here and Post 7 here. The kukri is a proven survival blade.

In fact, the main reason I bought my first CAK was for it to be my "Armageddon" blade.
 
The issue is something what I kind of picked up from Ray Mears philosophy: don't expect generalities, expect specifics.

What is the "best" survival knife can very well vary with what region, what flora or even what season of the world you are in. The above Bushcraft for example may be good for woods and whatnot: but what could you do with it in a desert or in the middle of an ocean (where the steel will rust like holy hell)? Or what about finding yourself in the middle of the artic, how well do you think your regular Kukri will do in the freezing cold?
Then there is the issue of the individual: how fit he (or she) is, how well does he know flora/fauna, how well does he know how to make shelter, what does he need, etc, etc.

Each "survival" situation is always a bit unique: you can't tell where you will be, what you will have to do, whether you are injured or disabled or even what you can expect.

This is why I am hesitant: what is needed for survival really depends on the circumstances and it is impossible to adjust to all circumstances.
 
The above Bushcraft for example may be good for woods and whatnot: but what could you do with it in a desert
Well, having lived in the desert, I preferred a long blade for the simple reason just about everything seemed to have some sort of needle or spike on it, and many of the smaller animals made it a good practice to stay a bit away from them when killing them. A lighter kukri, like a 3/8" spine Tamang or even Dui Chirra would be fine. I even think the M43 Wildmike used had a 3/8" or so spine. You wouldn't need a CAK. Also, all of the abov e are fine for stabbing.

or in the middle of an ocean (where the steel will rust like holy hell)?
Will you have a use for ANY knife in the middle of the ocean??

Or what about finding yourself in the middle of the artic, how well do you think your regular Kukri will do in the freezing cold?
It'll do as well as anything else will. Keep it stored INSIDE your parka (like you have to do with an axe up there) so the steel doesn't become overly brittle, and it'll be fine. Can use it to cut ice blacks or help make snow shelters, and a big blade (assuming no gun) is better when all you get to eat is some seal, walrus, etc. A polar bear will still probably kill you, but it'll at least bleed for its dinner. BTW the differential heat treat will do nothing but make the blade more survivable in the extreme cold.


Then there is the issue of the individual: how fit he (or she) is, how well does he know flora/fauna, how well does he know how to make shelter, what does he need, etc, etc.

If they are unfit, they probably won't survive. No man-powered tool is usable for long periods for an unfit person. The other objections make no difference in cutting tool choice. If you know your local fauna and flora, know how to build a shelter, etc, you'll be able to do it with whatever tools you have. The kukri is a superior choice in being able to do the job of a machete, axe, drawknife, etc.

Each "survival" situation is always a bit unique: you can't tell where you will be, what you will have to do, whether you are injured or disabled or even what you can expect.
Which is why you want the most versatile equipment.

This is why I am hesitant: what is needed for survival really depends on the circumstances and it is impossible to adjust to all circumstances.

Then list your exact requirements and although we probably won't tell you that something is better than a kukri, we can tell you how to use its advantages best.
 
That's a very, very good point. Considering that most of us don't live in teh desert or secluded in nowhere, perhaps I'll have to consider it as a more specified tool that should also function well across a whole spectrum of things.

Truth is, I'm [not exactly] secretly designing my own knife blade, that will be very, very kukri-esque. I'm thinking when I've got it refined the way I want and consider it "done" I might see if HI is interested in making it for me.

What other tools would one need besides blade and/or ax?
 
Last edited:
The khukuri can teach you.

I've written about stabbing before, somewhere on the forum.

In the normal position a stab with the khukuri leaves the wrist in a more nearly neutral position than does a stab with a straight blade.

There is another main forward grip position, which you can achieve by rotating the knife in your grasp 180 degrees, til the edge points up. There are 2 more main reverse grip positions.

All these positions offer opportunities. Every khukuri is different, so be quiet and listen to it.
 
I wanted a longer note, but sort of screwed up, so I'll do just a drive-by-reply:

Regarding kukri and ice: what you want when handling ice is a saw. On documentaries about eskimos, they used a saw to make an iglo. It looked weird but it made more sense than trying to hack it.

Regarding deserts and long knives: why not just improvise a spear? Or is there no suitable wood anywhere?

Knives and seas: I would figure gutting fish if that is a possibility. For that, you really want a small knife.

I agree with the wisdom of the khukuri + karda + chakma design.

I'm not saying that a khukri is a bad survival knife. If anything, I sort of believe in the opposite.
However, I am simply hesitant at saying "the khukuri is the ultimate knife for any survival situation". Would I say that it can replace a machete or axe? Yes. But would I say that it does a better job than either one on their own? I am not sure, as I do not have that much experience with either axe-heavy or machete-heavy jobs (I don't live near a bamboo forest).
 
Last edited:
I wanted a longer note, but sort of screwed up, so I'll do just a drive-by-reply:

Regarding kukri and ice: what you want when handling ice is a saw. On documentaries about eskimos, they used a saw to make an iglo. It looked weird but it made more sense than trying to hack it.
"Want" and "can do the job" are two different things. By the tone of your post, I was seeing this as an unplanned event leading to a survival situation, not a day of intentionally going out into a particular environment, in which case you'd take dedicated equipment.

Regarding deserts and long knives: why not just improvise a spear? Or is there no suitable wood anywhere?
Well, at least where I lived, it was mostly short brush like plants or very hard, dry, twisted trees. If you wanted a spear, you really had to take the whole thing with you. A long blade and BBQ tongs to pick things up were more portable.

Knives and seas: I would figure gutting fish if that is a possibility. For that, you really want a small knife.
Well, for small fish, you have the karda. Small game and fish can also be dressed with the kukri, you hold the kukri still and move the animal over the blade. However, if you were stranded at sea, you're not likely to find a lot of small fish, and you're also not likely to have the equipment to catch, or safely bring in a large fish in a lifeboat. If you're in a large boat that's lost power and has deep sea fishing equipment, it also probably has a galley with fillet knives. ;) In any case, you probably want to do the major dressing out of a big fish with the kukri anyway.

I agree with the wisdom of the khukuri + karda + chakma design.

I'm not saying that a khukri is a bad survival knife. If anything, I sort of believe in the opposite.
However, I am simply hesitant at saying "the khukuri is the ultimate knife for any survival situation". Would I say that it can replace a machete or axe? Yes. But would I say that it does a better job than either one on their own? I am not sure, as I do not have that much experience with either axe-heavy or machete-heavy jobs (I don't live near a bamboo forest).

The kukri isn't the ultimate survival knife because it is best at all these jobs, but because it does all of these jobs well. In my mind, I also include the karda and chakma, in the "kukri system" because very few HI kukri don't come with them. Some, like the full on Dui Chirra kits have 6 tools that come with them and have been described as the Nepali Swiss Army Knife.

In any case, if you read most of my posts on the subject in the W&SS "Skills" subforum (where most of my survival posts are), you'll see that I favor a two-tool (one large, one small) system as a minimum, adding fillet or butcher knives as specialty knives if your intended activities would benefit from them, but the two-tool system CAN handle the specialty tasks, though not be ideal for all of them.
 
IMPENDING LAME PUN

stab ability- how well a tool performs as a stabbing weapon
stab-a-bility- how much you would like to stab a tool with a weapon
 
Can one stab effectively with a kukhri? An uppercut done with the knife held edge-up using a hammer grip would be a good place to begin to explore that question. Stabbbing can be done effectively with a pencil or a fork. It is soooo much more a question about skills than tools. I wouldn't want to be stabbed by a kukhri. I bet the Himalayas are filled with tales with unfortunates who have been stabbed by kukhri.

"Do you really need to stab when you have a blade capable of taking someone's hand off?"--Wolf 1989

Any lack that Kukhri have in the stabbing dept. is more than made up for by its ease at "defanging the snake" or any other unversial technique of lopping limbs off your opponent. Have Gurkhas had any complaint with their kukhri as combat weapons, ever?

I can't speak to kukhri as survival knife, outside what I know of them as camp knives. I have a 12" inch Pen and 13" CAK that have proved themselves great at: sharpening pointed sticks of just about any size :eek:, Chopping wood and prepping tinder & kindling, Cleaning fish & prepping BBQ. Haven't skinned anything with them, but I have no doubt that they would do a fine job, particularly the Pen. They baton, wedge, shave & they pry. They cut rope, they pound pegs, they've even chopped hard boiled eggs...
Now give one to a Nepali who other Nepalis think is good with one & Lord knows what could be done, and has been done in those renowned gentle, forgiving Himalayas over the centuries. Again, skills vs. tools & the balance twixt the two.
My only complaint with kukhri is a personal preference for "smaller" blades. I'm 5' 9" 178lbs & getting older by the minute. Kukhri more than 15" don't seem to go camping or hiking with me, too much trade off size/weight wise. Others here have perfectly legitimate differences with that complaint ;):)
 
If you have to stab with a khukuri, Keep one hand under the pommel so it doesn't slide up and slice off your pinkies.
 
"Do you really need to stab when you have a blade capable of taking someone's hand off?"--Wolf 1989

This is the most to-point reply I've seen so far. A chainsaw can't stab but would make a terrifying self-defense weapon if you had it in your hands at the time. And therein lies the rub--for me the all-important question that has not been asked is, when would you ever have need of stabbing with a khukuri or indeed of "taking someone's hand off"? Or of stabbing with any blade for that matter? If we examine those potential situations, I think you'll find they are such that, a) they involve self-defense or your attack on another living creature, b) they're highly unlikely to occur at a time when you're carrying your khukuri around, and c) the advantage afforded by carrying a knife at the ready in such situations is not solely dependent on that knife's ability to stab or not stab, but on other factors.

So with some reluctance I'll enter the armchair warrior world of onanistic what-ifing: When would you need to stab, period, and could those situations occur when you're already carrying a khukuri? Are we talking about a situation in which you must fight off a wild animal? If so, one (esp. if he's from THIS crowd:D ) might actually be carrying a khuk. But having something--anything--of length (even better if it's sharp) that puts distance between you and Grendel is your point of advantage, not which way it cuts. I imagine--but do not know firsthand--that if a bear were to attack me while I was chopping wood or playing caveman, I'd be relieved I had _some_ weapon in my hand and wouldn't immediately wish it had been a khuk instead of an axe or machete or whatever.

Are we talking about being attacked by someone wielding a knife? I would posit that the Freddie Kruegers and Jason Voorhees' of the world do not hang out in the deep woods, and that effectively carrying your khukuri around (unless you're a Ghurka in the service) in areas where you are likely to be attacked will prove quite difficult. By "effectively" I mean a method of carry that will not garner questions from the police (ie open carry) and that will allow you to quickly put it into your hand from where it's carried. The khukuri does not excel at this combination. If anyone has ideas for a quick-draw khuk concealment holster, I'd love to see it.

Are we talking about being attacked by someone not wielding a knife? If you do for some reason have a khuk in your hand, I can't imagine they'd make you their target. Thieves are cowards and look for people whom they don't expect to fight back. And if you must, speed is of the utmost importance. I don't care what's in your fanny pack or backpack if you're beaten down while slipping it off your shoulder and unzipping it. The original poster wrote that he's been thinking "about what makes a survival/heavy woods-brush/fighting knife lately". In my opinion, nothing does all of those things well. "Fighting" with a knife does not occur as most people imagine it. Most times someone will be using a knife on you will not involve a "fight" at all, but an ambush. This is not Japanese cinema and predators don't tend to announce their presence, square off, and spend five minutes making dramatic speeches while holding their katana hilts and looking away. My point is, you probably won't have a knife ready and trying to draw it might get you killed. Stabbing belongs primarily in the "fighting" category of use, and there are many smaller, lighter, much more concealable (and still legal) options for arming yourself with a defensive weapon. A few months ago I was attacked by three men while riding my bicycle from one town to another at dusk on a rural road here in Mozambique. They appeared quite literally out of nowhere and ordered me to get off the bike and leave it on the ground. One had a machete and another had a piece of iron rebar, the last was unarmed. Even though I could have tried to draw my leatherman multitool from its place on my belt, I think that would have got me cut up bad. My instinctive, faster (and successful) response was to hop off the bike, pick it up by the frame, and use IT as a weapon to chase after them while shouting bloody murder. If I had gone for a visible weapon, they would at least have taken my bike.

This post is not to say the khukuri will not do wicked things to someone in combat given the opportunity. This retired ghurka recently took on 40 thieves with one and won. It is to say that for the rest of us, if you're going to need to stab with something, you probably won't have a khukuri available and can certainly ready something else much faster, therefore the ability or lack thereof of the khuk to stab is a moot point for me and shouldn't diminish its status as an effective survival tool, because stabbing is not on the short list of a big survival knife's "must" features (if you're carrying a karda for those small pokey tasks...), and the combination of times when you need to stab and can have a khuk in your hand ready is almost an empty set.

I'd like to leave you with a quote from the late great Carl Cestari and then thoughts from Major W.E. Fairbairn, both of whom knew better than most how knife defense works:
"As far as defense against a knife goes, many (most?) such encounters are going to be ambush-type scenarios. Therefore, I actually think you're probably better off, at least initially, just dealing with it empty handed. Arrest and immobilize the weapon-bearing limb, then neutralize (i.e. incapacitate, maim, or kill) the body attached to that arm.
Deploying any weapon under pressure is difficult, a folding knife (which is probably what most of us carry most often) is even worse due to the number of actions that have to happen to have it ready for use. All too many people "fixate" on trying to draw a weapon instead of just dealing with the threat. You have to establish dominance before trying to access a tool or you're going to be stuck behind the curve.
"

But "catching" a knife is really risky business, and Carl admitted this. In his later years, for times when you're being attacked with a knife, Major W.E. Fairbairn advocated creating distance with an object (chair, bike, whatever), or barring that a "lightning-fast kick to the groin," or simply running. The knife he helped design to give soldiers a better option than these, unsurprisingly, looks nothing like a khukuri. To be successful, its design is solely devoted to concealability, quick presentation and pure, fast stab capability.

Every tool does something well. No tool does everything well. Feel free to criticize my reasonings above; I'm here to learn, contribute, and wouldn't bother writing all this in just any forum community:foot:
 
Last edited:
kenniets;

believe it or not I'm more agreable that you would think. This is why I'm considering the stab to this knife and questioning it - because for 99.9% of the time it would NEVER be used. it will be tol first, and weapon around, oh, 12th ha ha! Although, I would say that during some things like hurricane katrina a heavy tool would have been useful for clearing teh junk out fo your place and yard, but people where robbing and murdering each other over some pretty dumb things - and in that respect if someone wanted to thrreaten you over the fresh water you were carrying while out clearin your yard, then such a knife -could- , and I say -could-, be pressed into service as such. but most likely, as you say, it will never ever see such use, and is much more likly to be used as a tree delimbing tool or even a camping blade than anything.

as I said previously, I'm working on a knife design myself, not sure how it will go, but I've been thinking about this design feature and contemplating how to best make it more useful as a tool. more on this soon, I hope.
 
Well, let's put it this way, when someone asks about a survival/heavy woods-brush/fighting knife, I automatically think of a worst-case scenario situation. As I've said before (maybe this thread, maybe another, I'm too lazy to go look), the kukri isn't my first choice because it's great at all those tasks, but because unlike just about any other tool, it can do all of those tasks well.

As far as the Fairbairn-Sykes knife, no, it doesn't look like a kukri, it's a straight up medieval style dagger -- a stabbing weapon. Keep in mind, that few, if any, martial experts today use anything like the F-S fighting knife. So, if "what the experts recommend" is to be our guide, the F-S ain't it. At least not anymore. Howeve3r, when the Gurkhas picked their fighting knife -- what a surprise! It looks just like a kukri. If you look on youtube for Gurkha videos of them demonstrating their kukri, they both slash and stab with it.

When would we have it to even use it? THAT is a good question. I have mine on me when I'm in my yard or when I'm hiking/camping. Where I live, we can carry any size knife we want, if we carry it openly. There's a law against "improper display" of daggers, dirks, bowies and swords. When I asked for clarification, I was told that meant being out of its sheath in public for any reason other than self defense.

So most likely, I'd be using it in the woods. When would I need to use it for self defense in the woods? Unfortunately, a lot of people throw their dogs out of their cars to leave them out here, since it's very rural. They get feral and can be quite dangerous. We also have large cats in the area and hogs. Now, some folks still hunt hogs with knives around here. Something short like a 15" kukri would work fine for that. So where does stabbing come in? Well, because they are good tools, kukri have some weight to them. Now granted, a slash with one will either kill or remove what it hits, but the fastest way to maneuver it and change directions is to use it in a stabbing mode -- useful if being attacked by something much faster than you are, like a feral dog.

Against people? You're right, most people get very polite when they see it at my side and usually say something nice to me, ending in "sir." Nothing says "don't fool with me" like a kukri. I don't even get that kind of respect when carrying a rifle. I've only drawn the kukri in relation to a human once, and he quickly backed down.

BUT, again, if we are talking about a survival/fighting situation, I think of things like Katrina or the 2004 hurricane season we had here (which no one remembers because we weren't acting like a bunch of wild monkeys looting and throwing poop at each other), where people DID walk around visibly armed (care to guess why we had very little looting?).

So likeliness aside, if someone asks if a kukri can do all of those things, I'm going to say "yes" because it can.
 
I've been doing some thinking about what makes a survival/heavy woods-brush/fighting knife lately. The Kukri really does have some of the best things going for it. One thing I have been tossing aboutthough is the point - The kukri point is softer in this area, and bieng out of line with the user's hand, gives it some difficulty in this area. That's not to say it cannot be done, just that it is slightly more difficult.

I'm curious on everyone's opinion - Is the Kukri really a stabbing blade, or is this a feature that is best avoided? please explain why or why not.

Like wise, what other features should a survival knife have? By that, I don't mean the ability to hold a compass and fishing line, but rahter, for example the kukri as it functions now is a knife AND an ax. Would incorporating another tool be beneficial, or would it actually encumber the design?

Snow,

I assume when you speak of stabbing this would be in a self defense situation against another human or animal. In that case, people are often killed in prison with sharpened spoons of questionable metal composition so even a tourist grade kukri should penetrate the human or animal body with sufficient force and depth to get the job done. Of course an HI would do it and look good! Aliens and Zombies may wear armour so that may be a different situation altogether and would have to be considered on a case by case basis.

On the survival part. Don't discount the compass and fishing line. If you look up survival situation deaths and near deaths you will see that aside from injury, the biggest causes of death are lack of an ability to navigate out. This is usually due to people walking in large right hand circles because they are unable or don't know how to que off of fixed landscape features. Another big reason people die is lack of food and water. The lack of food also greatly increases the likelhood of frostbite and heat related problems. Virtually anyone can turn over some rocks until they find a worm and catch a life sustaining fish with their fishing hook and line stored in their trusty Rambo knife!

I would rather have a good outdoor knife with a good compass, fishing line and some sort of fire starter, preferably a lighter, than some fancy overkill knife that will do little for me in a real life situation.

An ideal setup would be an HI BAS with a custom leather sheath. The sheath would have a Leatherman, a file and a pouch attached that could hold a small, watertight Nalgene bottle with the big mouth to hold matches, water purfication tablets, some tinder, signal mirror, whistle and an emergency blanket. Just some thoughts...
 
Keep in mind, that few, if any, martial experts today use anything like the F-S fighting knife. So, if "what the experts recommend" is to be our guide, the F-S ain't it.

That is strange, because Fairbairn himself was an expert and his student/pal Applegate made a similar knife. There is a lot of martial arts tradition regarding daggers.
Daggers are more rare nowadays because of the cost: it is a dedicated combat weapon meant to kill humans (for the most part). It is also more expensive than regular knives due to the fact that daggers have to be very symmetrically grinded.

Those that do wield it out of choice however are quite dangerous people to mess with.

I have a F-S (or to be precise, an Aitor copy) and there is very big difference between it and a kukri.

While comparing it based purely on the mostly-academic-martial-arts stuff I've read about and swinging it around (and cutting and stabbing cardboard boxes), I can however feel safe to tell you this: we are talking about apples and oranges.

The F-S and daggers in general are meant for in-fighting. They are much more delicate and precise instruments, meant not only to stab but to cut arteries and rupture organs with every (proper) strike. That is all that it is good for too. You can change grips on it quite easily to suit different martial arts stlyes.
Some say that the FS can even be made for throwing, although I am sceptical of the value of throwing knives.

Meanwhile, a kukri is a working tool. It is meant to do heavy-duty stuff and do a lot of those things. While I have only have my own for comparison ( a fairly heavy CAK) we are talking about something that has a very different balance.
It can stab yes, I can confirm that. However, when compared to the FS it is more clumsy and inaccurate in that regard.

A kukri is going to be more difficult to push between ribs, while the FS is thin and long enough to do that. This is simply because the kukri is not meant to do that: you need a thing blade to do that.
Or something that a special ops guy or something would need: silence a guard. A dagger can readily cut a throat. A kukri is more difficult to move like that.

However, a kukri can easily chop things, even limbs. That it is what it's good at. The long blade give it sort similar handling characteristics of a machete.

In sum, we are looking at two different stlyes of weapon: one is large and more like a sword, while the other is meant for in-fighting. You cannot fairly compare one with the other.

As for it being a choice of melee weapon for a Gurka: I don't think that they chose it out of a big selection but because it made more sense to stick what the soldiers know. Gurkhas, unless I am mistaken, come from Nepal where a kukri is an everyday item. They are already familiar with it. It is also a good working tool, something that has to be considered in the modern military.

If you don't know what I mean, look at bayonets: increasingly, they came away from false-edged daggers to be more and more multi-purpose knives that can be used for a variety of things such as cutting wires or sawing. That is why we see more half-serrated military blades too.
That is, military knives have become increasingly utilitarian. I chiefly see a kurki as a utilitarian knife rather than a combat one.
 
Cpl, one thing for sure we can agree on---now I'm not one of those "hunker in the bunker, doomsday is coming" type folks. But if I were:

you can be sure I'd take a good khukuri over a F&S dagger in a "crap hits the fan" situation any day, and for the reasons you listed. It doe so many things well. No argument there! :thumbup:
 
Back
Top