Well, i was one of the vocal dissenters in the Luminox debate. Because my experience was based not on one watch, nor even 2 or 3, but about 10 different watches, and ALL of them had the same, fairly serious flaws, i have no choice but to conclude that Luminox has some QC issues. It is of course POSSIBLE that it was a coincidence, but i find that hard to believe.
I know that the tritium has the "cool factor" locked up tight, but, some of the better watches, which use the current generation of SuperLuminova, are extremely bright, and though they do need to absorb light to work, they are nonetheless extremely bright, even after many hours of being in the dark, and my Seiko divers watch has such a bright dial, i have never once not been able to clearly read it under any lighting conditions.
Believe me, i too want a tritium watch, i know the allure of it, but im not going to buy a poorly made watch just to get the tritium, if i really NEED tritium, ill take out my Sig 226 with its Trijicon night sights and get my tritium fix, until i find a well made watch with tritium. I may end up buying an older Sinn EZM1 H3, if i can find one at a good price. Thats a GOOD watch, WITH tritium. Expensive though, probably about $1500. Im actually considering trying one of the Marathons based in part on what i have heard in these types of threads, and my subsequent checking them out on the web. If i get one, ill let you all know what i think, if you care...
