- Joined
- Apr 10, 2000
- Messages
- 3,794
Few weeks ago I've tested HRC on 2 knives, Benchmade 710 and Tadatsuna Kamagata usuba. M2 from BM tested 58.8 HRC and Tadatsuna white steel was 62.3HRC.
Needless to say, I was disappointed with M2 being under advertised hardness 60-62HRC.
So, 2 M2 blades from BM 710 went to to Phil Wilson for rehardening, and so did the Kershaw Shallot CPM 110V blade.
Repeated testing showed 59HRC for that M2 blade, which is very close to 58.8HRC, thus I exclude calibration errors. For the record, Kershaw tested 59HRC, which is within 58-61HRC.
Here's what's interesting though. I've had 2 710 folders for EDC use, 710 BT2 coated and 710 BC coated.
BC was the one that tested 58.8HRC.
Now, the interesting part is that the second M2 blade(BT) tested 60 HRC. I've used that blade for around 3 years as my EDC, and the softer 59HRC blade for another 5-6 years.
The way those edges are today: without knowing hardness and assuming they were equal I ended up with ~30 deg. edge on 60HRC and ~40 deg edge on 59HRC knife.
Both M2 blades started out at 30deg angle, using edge-pro. The softer M2 BC, did keep edge worse so I had to make the edge thicker to keep the acceptable edge holding I got used to from the first one. That didn't happen in one day, I figure it took year or so, while I was gradually thickening the edge.
I never did head to head cutting comparison between those two blades. Just EDC carry and whatever cutting that involved. Haven't changed neither my job nor habits either. So, it was pretty uniform stuff.
So, in the end of this long post I just want to say that even 1-1.5 HRC can make a difference for use. Especially long term. I don't know if I'd ever tell the difference if both knives were left at the factory 40-45 deg. edge. Probably not.
However, at 30deg. angle edge, that 1 or so point difference in hardness did manifest in time.
I guess this is my explanation and proof to those who ask why hardness is so important. Yes, I do realize testers have the error margin, hardness isn't the only indicator, etc. But for a given steel, higher hardness did allow me to have a thinner edge, thus better cutting ability.
It was pretty much blind testing from my perspective.
Anyway, I hope rehardened, hopefully 64HRC, M2 will work much better.
Needless to say, I was disappointed with M2 being under advertised hardness 60-62HRC.
So, 2 M2 blades from BM 710 went to to Phil Wilson for rehardening, and so did the Kershaw Shallot CPM 110V blade.
Repeated testing showed 59HRC for that M2 blade, which is very close to 58.8HRC, thus I exclude calibration errors. For the record, Kershaw tested 59HRC, which is within 58-61HRC.
Here's what's interesting though. I've had 2 710 folders for EDC use, 710 BT2 coated and 710 BC coated.
BC was the one that tested 58.8HRC.
Now, the interesting part is that the second M2 blade(BT) tested 60 HRC. I've used that blade for around 3 years as my EDC, and the softer 59HRC blade for another 5-6 years.
The way those edges are today: without knowing hardness and assuming they were equal I ended up with ~30 deg. edge on 60HRC and ~40 deg edge on 59HRC knife.
Both M2 blades started out at 30deg angle, using edge-pro. The softer M2 BC, did keep edge worse so I had to make the edge thicker to keep the acceptable edge holding I got used to from the first one. That didn't happen in one day, I figure it took year or so, while I was gradually thickening the edge.
I never did head to head cutting comparison between those two blades. Just EDC carry and whatever cutting that involved. Haven't changed neither my job nor habits either. So, it was pretty uniform stuff.
So, in the end of this long post I just want to say that even 1-1.5 HRC can make a difference for use. Especially long term. I don't know if I'd ever tell the difference if both knives were left at the factory 40-45 deg. edge. Probably not.
However, at 30deg. angle edge, that 1 or so point difference in hardness did manifest in time.
I guess this is my explanation and proof to those who ask why hardness is so important. Yes, I do realize testers have the error margin, hardness isn't the only indicator, etc. But for a given steel, higher hardness did allow me to have a thinner edge, thus better cutting ability.
It was pretty much blind testing from my perspective.
Anyway, I hope rehardened, hopefully 64HRC, M2 will work much better.