M398 Steel Testing – Edge Retention, Toughness, and More

Larrin

Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
4,970
Very interesting. I had no idea that M390 was a 30 year old steel either which probably says something about the knife market given how long it took to start making its way into production blades. I have yet to get a blade in S90V and the more I look at these cut and toughness tests the more this looks to be a real butter zone in the current market in terms of performance.
 
thank you for this work, even though it's a niche subsection of the knife steel choices

I can't see this working out, in all honesty, unless they can make it for significantly less $ than other pm steels
 
thank you for this work, even though it's a niche subsection of the knife steel choices

I can't see this working out, in all honesty, unless they can make it for significantly less $ than other pm steels
And cheap isn’t something the company has offered in the past.
 
Great article. Doesn't look like m398 would make an exceptional blade steel. I'm happy to stick with M390/20cv when it comes to stainless. Pretty easy to sharpen, wicked edge, and I have no problem with edge retention.
 
And cheap isn’t something the company has offered in the past.
very good point...
I realize my comment could have sounded snarky... I really just meant to say:
steel which gives up this much toughness for the sake of edge retention is not something I care to use
I like the ones which are good on both counts, I am not cutting hundreds of yards of leather a day (and if I was I might just do aeb-l at 62-63 ; p)

or, put another way, if I want edge retention & toughness, I'd use cpm-m4 or similar, by giving up the crazy high chrome you end up with a much better balance of performance... (and you don't need all that carbon) I'm cool with patina
 
Back
Top