- Joined
- Mar 8, 2008
- Messages
- 25,491
I'm actually very excited for an FRN version. SOLD!
It must not be so bad for hard use if the Chinook I and II used a hollow saber grind.
will the frn version be hollow or full flat ground?
4" or bigger blade and I'm all over it..
Eric said the larger one was 4" or better.
sal
Thanx Mike, We try to.
Eric is pretty busy right now so I'll chime in.
This model is the beginning of a long range plan. We also are not afraid to make improvements as we get feeedback for our customers as well as our own discriminating attitude in using our own designs.
Regarding the Jimping, Eric eliminated the jimping on the handle spine rear a while ago. He decided that it was abrasive to the hand going into the pocket past the knife. The rest of the jimping is quite useful, especially with gloves on.
On the steel, we're testing mid range materials to keep the price more competitive. 154Cm is no slouch steel. Eric also plans a full flat grind S90V version following this one. (he may have already begun the run). He likes S90V and he also likes full flat grind. But that's more of an "afi" model.
While we will continue to produce afi variations for you, me, Eric and crew, but we also need some lower cost variations if we are to serve all of our customers. You'll be seeing a number of good mid-range steels coming out in the next year as we balance cost and performance.
In defense of hollow grinds, every blade shape and grind have their advantages. A hollow ground blade is superior where one is not cutting very deep, such as in skinning. Cutting cardboard just using the thin portion of the blade rather than passing the spine through the cut. Line, cord, etc. a hollow grind excels.
The caged ball has worked very well. The "plastic" is really high tech stuff and will more than likely outperform most metals. What you might think "looks cheap" really isn't. High Tech materials have advantages.
The lock is strong, self adjusting and offers no play. the new Manix broke well into the "very heavy duty" range (MBC). It's stronger than the earlier Manix but at a lower weight and it's easier to clean. The beauty of the ball lock is that all of the strength is within a small area arojund the pivot and ball. Liners are not even necessary as in competitive locks. In addition, action on the ball locks is exceptional.
Think of it as a high-performance, light-weight tank.
He also plans an FRN version with texture like the E4/D4.
sal
Eric said the larger one was 4" or better.
sal
Eric said the larger one was 4" or better.
sal
I think enough has been said about the grind... but, yeah, I definitely will wait for the FFG version. I actually like the fact that the mini size version is being given first billing; it's perfect for EDC.
Will the 4 inch blade version of the Manix 2 be released simultaneously as the 3.something inch blade version?Eric said the larger one was 4" or better.
sal
I'm not waiting. FFG or no, I want another BBL Spyderco. That's the real selling point for me. :thumbup:
Will the 4 inch blade version of the Manix 2 be released simultaneously as the 3.something inch blade version?
Speaking of release dates, any ETA as well as pricing for both versions? I'm itching for the 4 inch one. I missed out on the first Manix, but then I saw the Manix 2 and am glad I waited.