- Joined
- Jan 21, 2020
- Messages
- 31
Thank you!Nobody is suing someone in another state over a few hundred dollars. Anyone who takes your money promising to initiate some kind of legal action over this is actually using that money to purchase crack and smoke it under the bridge with their fellow crack heads. Nobody is going to federal prison over this type of dispute, ever, never ever gonna ever happen. That is a fantasy scenario. Law enforcement is gonna say this is a civil dispute. They will say we don’t get involved in civil disputes. They are gonna say we don’t have jurisdiction. The only solution to this problem is if the guy returns the knife. Whether that happens depends on how much he values his reputation. That’s all there is to this. I really hope you get it back, and thanks for posting this.
I mostly agree with you, but believe it's incorrect that the Post Office does not care about and never pursues mail fraud on "small" matters such as soliciting and receiving money for purchase of Priority Mail postage and choosing to keep the money instead of mailing as promised or refunding. I am also aware that they also make themselves concerned about use of the mail to obtain property or money by fraud, but the postal money that was defrauded is, if I had to pick one, perhaps the bigger to them.
Where there does become a question is "willful" or intent. The failure to return the knife could arguably be procrastination rather than willful fraud, but the continued keeping of the Postal money is, at this present moment, a willful choice demonstrating intent to keep and therefore I think is sound fraud evidence. We will see if the Post Office agrees.
Last edited: