t1mpani
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2002
- Messages
- 5,494
...are actually very surprising to me. You have to understand, though I'm not nearly as much of a "guess what I did with my knife today" forumite as I used to be, I've been around a long time and have watched Becker from the pre-Camillus days, and enjoy several Beckers in my collection from all of the makers. I seemed to have a very specific idea of what a BK5 was, but I'd never gotten around to procuring one. Still, so very often raved about, it was one of those that was just absolutely going to be added to the collection eventually. Well, I was already placing an order for another item from a dealer that carries Becker, and just decided that the time was NOW.
It's the Spyderco Military all over again---another classic pattern, one of the favorites of the "in crowd" of a great knife maker, and after two minutes of inspection I'd already arrived at the decision to sell it. In the Military's case it was an issue of ergonomics, while the Becker just feels...flimsly. Now, before you start, I know it's NOT flimsy and I know that knives don't have to be thick to be useful or even tough. I've often gotten along with nothing but a Russell Green River knife, which is even lighter, thinner, and certainly does not compare in terms of the blade steel. It's just that...somehow, a Becker isn't supposed to feel like this. Kind of like if Lamborghini produced a minivan; they could likely do it very well, but it'd just be wrong.
Tell me if I'm senile, but it seems like I actually did pick one up quite a while back (as in picking it up off a table, not buying it) and my memory was of a more substantial knife. Were the Camillus versions a little beefier? Of course, for the premium I'd likely pay for a Camillus in the collector's market, I'd probably do just as well getting Bill Siegle or somebody to produce sort of a "brute" version of it for me, incorporating the handle design changes that I'd planned on for this one.
I know the responses are going to be "try it" (along with a few who feel that I'm unfairly besmirching their favorite knife) and I understand that the knife is a fully capable tool, but I'll just be sending it on its way to somebody who'll appreciate it in some upcoming sale thread. I love the blade shape, but more rigidity and momentum in a swing is far and away my preference in a fixed blade for the outdoors, and the same holds true for general cutting---weight-forward moves and carves very naturally/accurately for me, whereas a more neutral balance makes the knife feel clumsy. As for the kitchen---well, it's not going to keep up with the other knives in my kitchen.
You're very likely asking yourself, "what's the point of this thread?" and in truth, there isn't much of one beyond the desire to commiserate with other knife knuts--even those who don't share my opinions on this particular knife--on the keen disappointment that comes from looking forward to something for a LONG time, finally succumbing, and then being underwhelmed just from the standpoint of your own preferences. No complaints about Becker--not for one minute do I feel like this is a lesser-quality knife than the other Beckers, nor again that it couldn't do a fine job in just about any task, it's just that it really is more of a black butcher knife than I'd thought. True, most of the pioneers who actually explored and settled the vast wilderness of North America did it with butcher knives in sheaths, but I've been at this long enough (and my knife collection is stupidly-huge enough) to know I prefer the cleavers to the dicers.
Anyway, I really wish I'd liked it---I was looking forward to the modifications I'd had planned for it. Oh well, there are far worse problems to have!
It's the Spyderco Military all over again---another classic pattern, one of the favorites of the "in crowd" of a great knife maker, and after two minutes of inspection I'd already arrived at the decision to sell it. In the Military's case it was an issue of ergonomics, while the Becker just feels...flimsly. Now, before you start, I know it's NOT flimsy and I know that knives don't have to be thick to be useful or even tough. I've often gotten along with nothing but a Russell Green River knife, which is even lighter, thinner, and certainly does not compare in terms of the blade steel. It's just that...somehow, a Becker isn't supposed to feel like this. Kind of like if Lamborghini produced a minivan; they could likely do it very well, but it'd just be wrong.

Tell me if I'm senile, but it seems like I actually did pick one up quite a while back (as in picking it up off a table, not buying it) and my memory was of a more substantial knife. Were the Camillus versions a little beefier? Of course, for the premium I'd likely pay for a Camillus in the collector's market, I'd probably do just as well getting Bill Siegle or somebody to produce sort of a "brute" version of it for me, incorporating the handle design changes that I'd planned on for this one.
I know the responses are going to be "try it" (along with a few who feel that I'm unfairly besmirching their favorite knife) and I understand that the knife is a fully capable tool, but I'll just be sending it on its way to somebody who'll appreciate it in some upcoming sale thread. I love the blade shape, but more rigidity and momentum in a swing is far and away my preference in a fixed blade for the outdoors, and the same holds true for general cutting---weight-forward moves and carves very naturally/accurately for me, whereas a more neutral balance makes the knife feel clumsy. As for the kitchen---well, it's not going to keep up with the other knives in my kitchen.
You're very likely asking yourself, "what's the point of this thread?" and in truth, there isn't much of one beyond the desire to commiserate with other knife knuts--even those who don't share my opinions on this particular knife--on the keen disappointment that comes from looking forward to something for a LONG time, finally succumbing, and then being underwhelmed just from the standpoint of your own preferences. No complaints about Becker--not for one minute do I feel like this is a lesser-quality knife than the other Beckers, nor again that it couldn't do a fine job in just about any task, it's just that it really is more of a black butcher knife than I'd thought. True, most of the pioneers who actually explored and settled the vast wilderness of North America did it with butcher knives in sheaths, but I've been at this long enough (and my knife collection is stupidly-huge enough) to know I prefer the cleavers to the dicers.
Anyway, I really wish I'd liked it---I was looking forward to the modifications I'd had planned for it. Oh well, there are far worse problems to have!